Skip to main content
Log in

Coordination and Cooperation in Dyadic Relationships

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Markov model with a coordination parameter isdeveloped to depict coordination and cooperation decisionprocesses in 2 × 2 game relationships. The parameters ofthe model can be used to define and measure various forms ofinfluence. The model is applied to data collected using aprisoner's dilemma payoff structure to represent thesuperior-subordinate relationship. The results demonstrate theusefulness of the model and the measures of influence. Superiorsand subordinates are more likely to coordinate following mutualcooperation, achieving matching behaviors more frequently thanan independent-decisions model would predict. Subordinates showslightly more influence over leaders' behaviors than vice versa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budescu, D.V. (1984), "Tests of Lagged Dominance in Sequential Dyadic Interaction," Psychological Bulletin, 96, 402–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D.M. and S. Shane (1997), "A Prisoner's Dilemma Approach to Entrepreneur-Venture Capitalist Relationships," Academy of Management Review, 23, 142–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. and M. Knez (1997), "Coordination in Organizations," in Z. Shapira (Ed.) Organizational Decision Making, Cambridge.

  • Dansereau, F.G., G. Graen and W.J. Haga (1975), "A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.M. (1980), "Social Dilemmas," Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.M. and J.M. Orbell (1994), "The Benefit of Optional Play in Anonymous One-Shot Prisoner's Dilemma Games," in K. Arrow, L.R. Mnookin, A. Tversky and R.Wilson (Eds.) Barriers to Conflict Resolution,Norton, 62–85.

  • Dienesch, R.M. and R.C. Liden (1986), "Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Development," Academy of Management Review, 11, 618–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. and D.W. Fiske (1979) "Dynamic Patterning in Conversation," American Scientist, 67, 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, F. (1967), A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness.New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glance, N.S. and B.A. Huberman (1993), "The Outbreak of Cooperation," Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 17, 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glance, N.S. and B.A. Huberman (1994), "Social Dilemmas and Fluid Organizations," in K.M. Carley and M.J. Prietula (Eds.) Computational Organization Theory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glance, N.S., T. Hogg and B.A. Huberman (1997), "Training and Turnover in the Evolution of Organizations," Organization Science, 8, 84–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, C.N. (1975), "The Reciprocal Nature of Influence between Leader and Subordinate," Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, C.N. (1979), "Questions of Causation in the Path-Goal Theory of Leadership," Academy of Management Journal, 22, 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J.M. (1980), Marital Interactions: Experimental Investigations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, H. (1969), "Separable Games," Behavioral Science, 14, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P. and C. Saunders (1997), "Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange," Organization Science, 8, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold, D. (1977), "Two-Way Influence in Leader-Follower Dyads," Academy of Management Journal, 20, 224–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C.W.L. (1990), "Cooperation, Opportunism, and the Invisible Hand: Implications for Transaction Cost Theory," Academy of Management Review, 15, 500–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E.P. (1980), "Leadership and Social Exchange Processes," in K.J. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg and R.H. Willis (Eds.) Social Exchange Processes, New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. and T. Mitchell (1974), "Path-Goal Theory of Leadership," Journal of Contemporary Business, 81–97.

  • Jacobs, T.O. (1970), Leadership and Exchange in Formal Organizations. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, J. and S. Feldstein (1970), Rhythms of Dialogue. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, H. and J. Thibaut (1978), Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and U. Zander (1996), "What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning," Organization Science, 7, 502–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1986), No Contest: The Case Against Competition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorita, S.S. and C.D. Parks (1995), "Interpersonal Relations: Mixed-Motive Interaction," Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R.C. and G. Graen (1980), "Generalizability of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership," Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowin, A. and J.R. Craig (1968), "The Influence of Level of Performance on Managerial Style: An Experimental Object Lesson in the Ambiguity of Correlational Data," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 440–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M. (1991), "Learning to Cooperate: Stochastic and Tacit Collusion in Social Exchange," American Journal of Sociology, 97, 808–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M. (1993), "Backward-Looking Social Control," American Sociological Review, 58, 819–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M. (1995), "PAVLOV and the Evolution of Cooperation: An Experimental Test," Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W. (1987), "Modeling Coordination in Organizations and Markets," Management Science, 33, 1317–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, P.M. and J.S. House (1973), "Exchange between Superiors and Subordinates in Large Organizations," Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M.W., D. Sim, L.H. Damien and V. Grotto (1995), "Time of Decision, Ethical Obligation, and Causal Illusion: Temporal Cues and Social Heuristics in the Prisoner's Dilemma," in R.M. Kramer and D.M. Messick (Eds.) Negotiation as a Social Process: New Trends in Theory and Research, Sage.

  • Pruitt, D.G. (1967), "Reward Structure and Cooperation: The Decomposed Prisoner's Dilemma Game," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. and A.M. Chammah (1965), Prisoner's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, T.A. and G.B. Graen (1984), "Moderating Effects of Initial Leader-Member Exchange Status on the Effects on a Leadership Intervention," Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 428–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1970), Organizational Psychology, Second edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafir, E. and A. Tversky (1992), "Thinking Through Uncertainty: Nonconsequential Reasoning and Choice," Cognitive Psychology, 24, 449–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrowe, R.T. and R.C. Liden (1997), "Process and Structure in Leader-Member Exchange," Academy of Management Review, 22, 522–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. and P. Yetton (1973), Leadership and Decision-Making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahn, G.L. and G.Wolf (1980), "Leadership and the Art of Cycle Maintenance: A Simulation Model of Superior-Subordinate Interaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 26–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zahn, G.L., Wolf, G. Coordination and Cooperation in Dyadic Relationships. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 3, 249–265 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009605527435

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009605527435

Navigation