Skip to main content
Log in

An Exploratory Study: Supporting Collaborative Multimedia Systems Design

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multimedia systems design generally requires a collaborative effort from a group of designers with a variety of backgrounds and tasks, such as content experts, instructional designers, media specialists, users, and so forth. However, currently available design tools on the market are mainly designed for a single user. Tools intended to support a collaborative design process should coordinate independent activities of individual designers.

This research investigated support for work groups engaged in designing multimedia systems. Specifically, it discussed a new collaborative design environment, called the KMS (Knowledge Management System)-based design environment, in which multimedia designers could share their design knowledge freely. Through two experimental groups, the research investigated impacts of the KMS-based design environment on their collaborative design activities (knowledge creating, knowledge securing, knowledge distributing, and knowledge retrieving activities). The research findings showed that the KMS-based design environment was a promising environment for collaborative multimedia systems design. More specifically, the research findings indicated that the KMS-based design environment supported creating, securing, and retrieving knowledge, but it did not support distributing knowledge. In addition, the research found that the social interactions between group members played important roles in the success of the collaborative multimedia systems design and that the KMS-based design environment did not support the socialization of group members. Furthermore, the research found that the inability of the KMS-based design environment to support the socialization was linked to its low performance level in supporting the knowledge distributing activity. The research explored the desired features of a collaborative support tool for multimedia systems design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.F. Alber, Multimedia: A Management Perspective, Wadsworth Publishing: Belmont, CA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B.L. Chapman, “Accelerating the design process: A tool for instructional design,” White Paper of Designer' Edge, Allen Communication, 1995.

  3. R.F. Dyer and E.H. Forman, “Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process,” Decision Support Systems, pp. 99–124, 1992.

  4. E. England and A. Finney, Managing Multimedia, Addison-Wesley: NY, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Expert Choice. User Manual, Decision Support Software, Inc., McLean, VA, 1986.

  6. K. Harada, E. Tanaka, R. Ogawa, and Y. Hara, “Anecdote: A multimedia storyboarding system with seamless authoring support,” in Proceeding of ACM Multimedia, 1996.

  7. T. Isakowitz, E.A. Stohr, and P. Balasubramanian, “RMM: A methodology for structured hypermedia design,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 38, No. 8, pp. 34–44, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.T. Keim, A. Kagan, and G. Post, “MASET: Multi-attribute software evaluation tool,” in Proceedings of the AIS Conference, 1997.

  9. K. Kiddoo, “Discovering the rules: Initiative and teamwork in multimedia project design,” Multimedia Review, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 46–51, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Korpela and M. Tuominen, “Benchmarking logistics performance with an application of the analytic hierarchy process,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 323–333, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Liebowitz, “Determining functional requirements for NASA goddard' command management system software design using expert systems,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Engineering Management Department, George Washington University, 1985.

  12. J. Liebowitz and L. Wilcox (Eds.), Knowledge Management and Its Integrative Elements, CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.A. Lnaday and B. Myers, “Sketching storyboards to illustrate interface behaviors,” in Proceedings of CHI 96, 1996.

  14. N.A.M. Maiden, C. Ncube, and A. Moore, “Lessons learned during requirements acquisition for COTS system,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40, No. 12, pp. 21–25, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.T. Maybury, Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Park and M.J. Hannafin, “Empirically-based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia,” Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 63–85, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Ramanathan and L.S. Ganesh, “Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages,” European Journal of Operation Research, Vol. 79, pp. 249–265, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 2nd ed., RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.P. Sinha and J.H. May, “Providing design assistance: A case-based approach,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 363–387, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Spek and A.L. Spijkervet, “A methodology for knowledge management,” in Tutorial Notes of The 3rd World Congress on Expert Systems, Seoul, Korea, 1996.

  21. D. Straub, “The effect of culture on IT diffusion: E-mail and Fax in Japan and the US,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 23–47, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. N.A. Streitz, “Designing collaboration environments based on the common ground of hypermedia and CSCW,” in Tutorial Notes of The Seventh ACM Conference on Hypertext, 1996.

  23. L. Tway, Welcome to Multimedia, Management Information Source Press, New York, NY, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R.C. Van Den Honert and F.A. Lootsma, “Group preference aggregation in the multiplicative AHP: The model of the group decision process and preto optimality,” European Journal of Operation Research, Vol. 96, pp. 363–370, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D.B. Walz, J.J. Elam, and B. Curtis, “Inside a software design team: Knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 63–77, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D.B. Walz, J.J. Elam, H. Krasner, and B. Curtis, “A methodology for studying software design teams: An investigation of conflict behaviors in the requirements definition phases,” in Empirical Studies of Programmers, Vol. 2, G. Olson, E. Soloway, and S. Sheppard (Eds.), Albex: Norwood, NJ, 1987, pp. 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baek, S., Liebowitz, J. & Lewis, M. An Exploratory Study: Supporting Collaborative Multimedia Systems Design. Multimedia Tools and Applications 12, 189–207 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009619724484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009619724484

Navigation