Skip to main content
Log in

Structural Learning: Attraction and Conformity in Task-Oriented Groups

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study extends previous research that showed how informal social sanctions can backfire when members prefer friendship over enforcement of group norms. We use a type of neural network to model the coordination of informal social control in a small group of adaptive agents confronted with a social dilemma. This model incorporates two mechanisms of social influence, informal sanctions and imitation. Both mechanisms vary with the strength of the social tie between source and target. Previous research focused on the effects of social sanctions. Here, we demonstrate a curvilinear effect of imitation on compliance with prosocial norms. Moderate doses of imitation reduce the coordination complexity of self-organized collective action and help the network achieve satisfactory levels of cooperation. High doses, however, undermine the agent-based learning required to find cooperative solutions. Increasing group size also diminishes compliance due to increased complexity, with larger groups requiring more imitation to overcome the coordination problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1997), "The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization," Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 203–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. (1977), Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. and J. Schwartz (1984), Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D.E. (1971), The Attraction Paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D.E. and W. Griffit (1966), "ADevelopmental Investigation of the Lawof Attraction," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 699–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. (1991), "A Theory of Group Stability," American Sociological Review, 56, 331–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D. and F. Harary (1966), "Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider's Theory," Psychological Review, 63, 277–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.S. and T.J. Sejnowski (1994), The Computational Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.M. (1977), "Sources of Peer Group Homogeneity," Sociology of Education, 50, 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.M. (1980), "Social Dilemmas," Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., S. Schachter and K. Back (1950), Social Pressures in Informal Groups. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flache, A. (1996), The Double Edge of Networks. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flache, A. and M.W. Macy (1996), "The Weakness of Strong Ties: Collective Action Failure in a Highly Cohesive Group," Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21.

  • Hebb, D.O. (1949), The Organisation of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Approach. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D.D. (1988), "Collective Sanctions and the Creation of Prisoner's Dilemma Norms," American Journal of Sociology, 94, 535–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G.C. (1951), The Human Group. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.

  • Homans, G.C. (1974), Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield, J.J. (1982), "Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Collective Computational Abilities," Proceedings of the American Academy of Sciences, Vol. 79, pp. 2554–2558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield, J.J. (1984), "Neurons with Graded Response have Collective Computational Properties like those of Two-State Neurons," Proceedings of the American Academy of Sciences, Vol. 81, pp. 3088–3092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield, J.J. and D.W. Tank (1985), "'Neural' Computation of Decisions in Optimization Problems," Biological Cybernetics, 52, 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D.B. (1978), "Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships," American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, A.J. and B.E. Lott (1965), "Group Cohesiveness as Interpersonal Attraction: A Review of Relationships with Antecedent and Consequent Variables," Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, J. (1995), Ain't No Makin It: Aspirations and Attainment in a Low Income Neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M.W. (1990), "Learning Theory and the Logic of Critical Mass," American Sociological Review, 55, 809–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M.W. (1991), "Chains of Cooperation: Threshold Effects in Collective Action," American Sociological Review, 56, 730–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M.W., J.A. Kitts and A. Flache (1997), "The Weakness of Strong Ties II: Collective Action Failure in a Self-Organizing Social Network," Presented at the 1997 Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association.

  • McPherson, J.M. and L. Smith-Lovin (1987), "Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups," American Sociological Review, 52, 370–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, T.M. (1961), The Acquaintance Process. New York, NY: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A. and R. Vallacher (1997), "Computational Social Psychology: Cellular Automata and Neural Network Models of Interpersonal Dynamics," in S. Read and L. Miller (Eds.), Connectionist Models of Social Reasoning and Social Behavior, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P. (1980), "Rewards and Punishments as Selective Incentives for Collective Action: Theoretical Investigations," American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1356–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, P.T. (1991), Connectionism and Psychology: A Psychological Perspective on New Connectionist Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummelhart, D. and J. McClelland (1988), Explorations in Parallel Distributed Processing: A Handbook of Models, Programs, and Exercises. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H. and R.E. Ames (1977), "Positive and Negative Referent Others as Sources of Influence: A Case of Helping," Sociometry, 40, 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seashore, S.E. (1954), "Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group," Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. (1932), The Fundamentals of Learning. Columbia University, New York, NY: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R.H. and L.M. Killian (1957), Collective Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, L.M. (1977), "The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices," Social Forces, 56, 576–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P.E. (1978), Profane Cultures. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, M. (1982), Countercultures. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeggelink, E. (1994), "Dynamics of Structure: An Individual Oriented Approach," Social Networks, 16, 295–333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kitts, J.A., Macy, M.W. & Flache, A. Structural Learning: Attraction and Conformity in Task-Oriented Groups. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 5, 129–145 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009670804792

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009670804792

Navigation