Skip to main content
Log in

Improved Modeling of Elevation Error with Geostatistics

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The elevations recorded within digital models are known to be fraught with errors of sampling, measurement and interpolation. Reporting of these errors according to spatial data standards makes several implicit and unacceptable assumptions about the error: it has no spatial distribution, and it is statistically stationary across a region, or even a nation. The approach explored in this paper employs actual elevations measured in ground and aerial survey at higher precision than the elevations in the DEM and recorded on standard paper maps. These high precision elevations are digitized and used to establish the real statistical and spatial distribution of the error. Direct measurements could also have been taken in the field by GPS or any other means of high precision data collection. These high precision elevations are subtracted from values stored in the DEM for approximately the same locations. The distribution of errors specific to the DEM can then be explored, and can be used in the geostatistical method of conditional stochastic simulation to derive alternative realizations of the error modeled and so of the DEM. Multiple versions of the derived products can also be determined. This paper compares the results of using different methods of error modeling. The best method, which gives widely implementable and defensible results, is that based on conditional stochastic simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T.J. Davis and C.P. Keller. “Modeling uncertainty in natural resource analysis using fuzzy sets and Monte Carlo simulation: slope stability prediction,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 11:409–434, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C.V. Deutsch and A.G. Journel. GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and Users Guide, University Press: Oxford, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DCDSTF (Digital Cartographic Data Standards Task Force), “The proposed standard for digital cartographic data,” American Cartographer, Vol. 15:9–140, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.A. Elassal and V.M. Caruso. “USGS Digital Cartographic Data Standards: Digital Elevation Models,” USGS Circular 895-B, Reston, Virginia, 1983.

  5. E. Englund. “Spatial simulation: Environmental applications,” in M.F. Goodchild, B.Q. Parks and L.T. Steyaert (Eds.), Environmental Modeling and GIS, Oxford University Press: New York, 432–437, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P.F. Fisher. “First experiments in viewshed uncertainty: the accuracy of the viewable area,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 57:1321–1327, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.F. Fisher. “Modeling soil map-unit inclusions by Monte Carlo simulation,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 5:193–208, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.F. Fisher. “First experiments in viewshed uncertainty: simulating the fuzzy viewshed,”Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 58:345–352, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P.F. Fisher. “Algorithm and implementation uncertainty in viewshed analysis,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 7-4:331–374, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.F. Fisher. “Probable and fuzzy models of the viewshed operation,” in M. Worboys (Ed.), Innovations in GIS 1, Taylor & Francis: London, 161–175, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.F. Fisher. “Reconsideration of the viewshed function in terrain modeling,” Geographical Systems, Vol. 3-1:33–58, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.F. Goodchild. “Algorithm 9: Simulation of autocorrelation for aggregate data,” Environment and Planning A, Vol. 12:1073–1081, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.F. Goodchild. Spatial Autocorrelation, CATMOG 47, GeoBooks: Norwich, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.F. Goodchild. “Attribute Accuracy,” in S.C. Guptill and J. Morrison (Eds.), Elements of Spatial Data Quality, Oxford: Pergamon, 59–79, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.F. Goodchild, S. Guoqing, and Y. Shiren. “Development and test of an error model for categorical data,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 6:87–103, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.F. Goodchild and G.J. Hunter. “A simple positional accuracy measure for linear features,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 11:299–306, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Goovaerts. Geostatistics for Natural Resource Evaluation. University Press: Oxford, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G.J. Hunter and M.F. Goodchild. “Modeling the uncertainty of slope and aspect estimates derived from spatial databases” Geographical Analysis, Vol. 29-1:35–49, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.E. Huss and M.A. Pumar. “Effect of database errors on intervisibility estimation,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 63:415–424, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Journel. “Modeling uncertainty and spatial dependence: Stochastic imaging,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 10:517–522, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D.P. Lanter and H. Veregin. “A research paradigm for propagating error in layer-based GIS, ” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 58:825–833, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Lee, P.K. Snyder, and P.F. Fisher. “Modeling the effect of data errors on feature extraction from digital elevation models,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 58-10:1461–1467, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Z. Li. “On the measure of digital terrain model accuracy,” Photogrammetric Record, Vol. 12-72:873–877, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C.G. Monckton. “An investigation into the spatial structure of error in digital elevation data,” in M. Worboys (Ed.), Innovations in GIS 1, Taylor & Francis: London, 201–211, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Openshaw, M. Charlton, and S. Carver. “Error propagation: A Monte Carlo simulation,” in I. Masser, and M. Blakemore (Eds.), Handling Geographical Information: Methodology and Potential Applications, Longman: London 102–114, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  26. OS, 1:50,000 Scale Height Data User Manual. Ordnance Survey, Southampton, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Y. Pannatier. Variowin: Software for Spatial Data Analysis in 2D, Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M.M. Thompson. Maps for America, 3rd Edition, USGS: Reston, VA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  29. USGS, Digital Elevation Models. Data Users Guide 5, Reston, VA, 1987.

  30. R. Weibel and M. Heller. “Digital terrain modeling,” in D.J. Maguire, M.F. Goodchild, and D. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications., Vol 1, Longman: London, 269–297, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisher, P. Improved Modeling of Elevation Error with Geostatistics. GeoInformatica 2, 215–233 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009717704255

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009717704255

Navigation