Skip to main content
Log in

Kinematic Reasoning with Spatial Decompositions

  • Published:
Constraints Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the application of hierarchical discrete spatial representations to the kinematic analysis and synthesis of the higher pairs. Two instances of hierarchical representation are investigated, a global decomposition in the form of quadtrees, and an object-centered, multi-level molecular decomposition. Kinematic reasoning with both representations relies upon the rapid evaluation of the single occupancy constraint. For both representations we present algorithms that allow the rapid detection of intersection between two objects, the analysis of higher pair mechanisms, and a restricted class of kinematic synthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Chakrabarti & T. Bligh. (1994). An approach to functional synthesis of solution in mechanical conceptual design: part I: introduction and knowledge representation,” Research in Engineering Design 6: 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Faltings. (1992). A symbolic approach to qualitative kinematics. Artificial Intelligence 56: 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B.V. Funt. (1980). Problem-solving with diagrammatic representations. Artificial Intelligence 13: 201–230.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Gardin & B. Meltzer. (1989). Analogical representations of naive physics. Artificial Intelligence 38: 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Gupta & M. Jakiela. (1994). Simulation and shape synthesis of kinematic pairs via small-scale interference detection. Research in Engineering Design 6: 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Hahn. (1988). Realistic animation of rigid bodies. (1988). Computer Graphics 22: 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Joskowicz & E. Sacks. (1991). Computational kinematics. Artificial Intelligence 51: 381–416.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Joskowicz & E. Sacks. (1994). Configuration space computation for mechanism design. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation.

  9. T. Lozano-Perez. (1983). Spatial planning: a configuration space approach. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-32: 89–120.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Hari Narayanan. (1992). Imagery, diagrams and reasoning. Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University.

  11. P. Olivier, A. Ormsby & K. Nakata. (1995). Occupancy array-based kinematic reasoning. Ninth International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, pages 148–155.

  12. F. Reuleaux. (1876). The Kinematics of Machinery. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Samet. (1990). The Design and Analysis of Spatial Data Structures. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Schwartz & M. Hegarty. (1996). Coordinating multiple mental representations for reasoning about mechanical devices. AAAI Spring Symposium on Cognitive and Computational Models of Spatial Representation, pages 101–109.

  15. S. Tessler, Y. Iwasaki & K. Law. (1995). Qualitative structural analysis using diagrammatic reasoning. In J. Glasgow, B. Chandresekaran & N. H. Narayanan, eds., Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, pages 711–730, AAAI Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olivier, P. Kinematic Reasoning with Spatial Decompositions. Constraints 3, 227–237 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009781812127

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009781812127

Navigation