Skip to main content
Log in

On Psycholinguistic Grammars

  • Published:
Grammars

Abstract

It has long been known that language acquisition is only possible if information is available above and beyond the mere presence of a set of strings in the language. One commonly postulated source of such information is a (possibly innate) constraint on the syntactic forms that a grammar can take. This paper develops and presents a set of formalisms based on the Marker Hypothesis that natural languages are “marked” for complex syntactic structure at surface form. It further compares the expressivity and restrictedness of these formalisms and shows that, first, not all constraints are actually restrictive, and second, that the Marker Hypothesis, and its implicit function/content word distinction, provide strong restrictions on the form of allowable grammars. These restrictions may in turn provide evidence about its actual psychological reality and salience. In particular, the class of strongly marked languages can be demonstrated not to admit all finite languages and thus not be subject to the hangman's noose of Gold's learnability proofs, and it is conjectured that these languages may provide a computable method of inferring human-like languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angluin, D. Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data. Information and Control, 45: 117-135, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. and P. Kay. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press. Berkeley, California, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R. C. and S. Pilato. Learning syntax by automata induction. Machine Learning, 2: 9-38, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. F., J. Cocke, S. A. Della Pietra, V. J. Della Pietra, F. Jelinek, J. D. Lafferty, R. L. Mercer and P. S. Roossin. A statistical approach to machine translation. Computational Linguistics, 16: 79-85, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. and E. Charniak. Learning probabilistic dependency grammars from corpora. In Working Notes, Fall Symposium Series, 25-32, 1992a, AAAI. Cited in (Charniak, 1993).

  • Carroll, G. and E. Charniak. Two experiments on learning probabilistic dependency grammars from labeled text. In Workshop Notes, Statistically-Based NLP Techniques, 1-13, 1992b, AAAI. Cited in Charniak (1993).

  • Charniak, E. Statistical Language Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. On certain formal properties of grammar. Information and Control, 2: 137-67, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. Remarks on nominalization. In Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar, 11-61, Mouton, The Hague, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W. Typology and Universals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr, B. J. Machine Translation: A View from the Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, E. M. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10: 447-74, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. R. G. The necessity of syntax markers: Two experiments with artificial languages. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18: 481-96, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. H. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg, editor, Universals of Grammar,MIT Press, Cambridge, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft, J. E. and J. D. Ullman. Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata.Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Mass., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft, J. E. and J. D. Ullman. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Mass., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendorff, R. S. Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juola, P. Learning to Translate: A Psycholinguistic Approach to the Induction of Grammars and Transfer Functions. Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juola, P. Phonetic ambiguity: Approaches, touchstones, pitfalls, and new directions. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Cognitive Science of Natural Language Processing (CSNLP-96), Dublin, Ireland, 1996.

  • Juola, P. Corpus-based acquisition of transfer functions using psycholinguistic principles. In Daniel Jones & Harry Somers, editors, New Methods in Language Processing, UCL Press, London, in press.

  • Keenan, E. and B. Comrie. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8: 63-99, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koncar, N. and G. Guthrie. A natural language translation neural network. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing (NeMLaP), 71-77, Manchester, 1994.

  • Kornai, A. and G. K. Pullum. The X-bar theory of phrase structure. Technical Report CSLI, 89-137. Centre for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, S. M. and R. I. Damper. Syuntactic neural networks. Connection Science, 2: 195-221, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, H. A., A. Salomaa and D. Wood. A supernormal form theorm for context-free grammars. Journal of the ACM, 30: 95-102, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, D. Development psycholinguistics. In F. Smith and G. A. Miller, editors, The Genesis of Language: A Psycholinguistic Approach, 15-84. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. L., R. P. Meier and E. L. Newport. Facilitating the acquisition of syntax with cross-sentential cues to phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 28: 360-74, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, K. and S. D. Moeser. The role of syntax markers and semantic referents in learning an artificial language. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22: 701-18, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagao, M. A framework of a mechanical translation between Japanese and English by analogy principle. In A. Elithorn and R. Barnerji, editors, Artificial and Human Intelligence, 173-80, North-Holland, 1984.

  • O'Grady, W., M. Dobrovolsky and M. Aronoff. Contemporary Linguistics: An Introduction. St. Martin's Press, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, G. K. The Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax. University of Chicago Press, 1991.

  • Slobin D. I. Psycholinguistics, second edition, Scott, Foresman, and Company, Glenview, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Juola, P. On Psycholinguistic Grammars. Grammars 1, 15–31 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009922701408

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009922701408

Navigation