Skip to main content

Sex, Breakfast, And Descriptus Interruptus

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Bezuidenhout, A.: 1997,‘Pragmatics, Semantic Underdetermination and the Referential/ Attributive Distinction’ Mind 106, 375-409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S.: 1990, Descriptions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, J.: 1993,‘Indexicals and Deixis’ Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 1-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, M.: 1996,‘The Ambiguity Thesis versus Kripke's Defence of Russell’ Mind and Language 11, 371-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Récanati, F.: 1993,.Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, F.: 1995,‘Descriptions, Indexicals, and Belief Reports: Some Dilemmas (But Not the Ones You Expect)’ Mind 104, 107-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K.: 2000,‘Emptiness without Compromise’ in Hofweber and Everett (eds), Empty Names, Fiction, and the Puzzles of Non-Existence, CSLI, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, K.A. Sex, Breakfast, And Descriptus Interruptus. Synthese 128, 45–61 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010349621943

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010349621943