Abstract
In line drawings derived from real images, lines may be missing due to contrast failure and objects with curved surfaces may cast shadows from multiple light sources.
This paper shows that it is the presence of shadows, rather than contrast failure, that renders the line drawing labelling problem NP-complete. However, shadows are a valuable visual cue, since their presence is formally shown to reduce the average ambiguity of drawings. This is especially true when constraints concerning shadow formation are employed to differentiate shadow and non-shadow lines.
The extended junction constraint, concerning straight lines colinear with junctions, compensates the loss of information caused by contrast failure. In fact, we observe the contrast failure paradox: a drawing is sometimes less ambiguous when lines are partly missing due to contrast failure.
It is known that the coplanarity of sets of object vertices can be deduced from the presence of straight lines in the drawing. This paper shows that these coplanarity constraints are robust to the presence of contrast failure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clowes, M.B. 1971. On seeing things. Artificial Intelligence, 2:79-116.
Cooper, M.C. 1993. Interpretation of line drawings of complex objects. Image and Vision Computing, 11(2):82-90.
Cooper, M.C. 1997a. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects with tangential edges and surfaces. Image and Vision Computing, 15:263-276.
Cooper, M.C. 1997b. Fundamental properties of neighbourhood substitution in constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence 90:1-24.
Cooper, M.C. 1999. Linear-time algorithms for testing the realisability of line drawings of curved objects. Artificial Intelligence, 108:31-67.
Cooper, M.C. 2000. Linear constraints for the interpretation of line drawings of curved objects. Artificial Intelligence, 119:235-258.
Cooper M.C. Not yet published. Reduction operations in fuzzy and valued constraint satisfaction, Fuzzy Sets and Systems.
Faugeras, O. 1993. Three-Dimensional Computer Vision. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
Freuder, E.C. 1991. Eliminating interchangeable values in constraint satisfaction problems. In Proceedings AAAI-91, Anaheim, CA, pp. 227-233.
Huffman, D.A. 1971. Impossible objects as nonsense sentences. In Machine Intelligence, Vol. 6, B. Meltzer and D. Mitchie (Eds.). Edinburgh University Press: UK, pp. 295-323.
Kirousis, L.M. and Papadimitriou, C.H. 1988. The complexity of recognizing polyhedral scenes. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 37(1):14-38.
Lichtenstein, D. 1982. Planar formulae and their uses. SIAM J. Computing, 11:329-343.
Malik, J. 1987. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1:73-103.
Malik, J. and Maydan, D. 1989. Recovering three-dimensional shape from a single image of curved objects. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(6):555-566.
Melhorn, K. 1974. Graph Algorithms and NP-Completeness, EACTS. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
Nalwa, V.S. 1988. Line drawing interpretation: A mathematical framework. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2(2):103-124.
Parodi, P. and Torre, V. 1994. On the complexity of labeling perspective projections of polyhedral scenes. Artificial Intelligence, 70:239-276.
Rubin, J.M. and Richards, W.A. 1982. Color vision and image intensities: When are changes material. Biological Cybernetics, 45:215-226.
Shimshoni, I. and Ponce, J. 1997. Recovering the shape of polyhedra using line-drawing analysis and complex reflectance models. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 65(2):296-310.
Straforini, M., Coelha, C., and Campani, M. 1993. Extraction of vanishing points from images of indoor and outdoor scenes. Image and Vision Computing, 11(2):91-99.
Sugihara, K. 1982. Mathematical structures of line drawings of polyhedrons–Towards man-machine communication by means of line drawings. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 4(5):458-469.
Sugihara, K. 1984. A necessary and sufficient condition for a picture to represent a polyhedral scene. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6(5):578-586.
Sugihara, K. 1986. Machine Interpretation of Line Drawings. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Tai, A., Kittler, J., Petrou, M., and Windeatt, T. 1993.Vanishing point detection. Image and Vision Computing, 11(4):240-245.
Tsang, E. 1993. Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction. Academic Press: San Diego.
Waltz, D. 1975. Understanding line drawings of scenes with shadows. In Psychology of Computer Vision, P.H. Winston (Ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 19-91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooper, M.C. The Interpretation of Line Drawings with Contrast Failure and Shadows. International Journal of Computer Vision 43, 75–97 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011166601983
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011166601983