Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of a Web-Based Tutorial on Problem Formulation Ability

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Business programs are under greater pressure than ever to provide their students with the analytical skills they will need for effective problem solving. The increasing complexity of today's business environment and the expanding volume of data to support decision making require students to have better modeling skills. Tutorials can shape and enhance skill development in domains which are process intensive and contain problems where mastery and proficiency require practice. In this paper, we present a web-based tutorial, MS-Tutor, to coach students on all aspects of algebraic formulation of linear and integer programs. Such tutorials have the potential to become an integral component of web-based course offerings. However, it is important to design the content in such a way that it enhances the learning process. MS-Tutor was designed by considering the following dimensions: Structure, which refers to the organization of the content; Feedback, so students can learn from mistakes; and Dialog, which affects the interaction between the user and the tutor. The results indicate there is potential for performance improvement if the tutor is used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Aimeur and C. Frasson, Analyzing a new learning strategy according to different knowledge levels, Computers and Education 27(2) (1996) 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.R. Anderson, C.F. Boyle, A.T. Corbett and M.W. Lewis, Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring, Artificial Intelligence 42 (1990) 7–49.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.R. Anderson, Cognitive Psychology and its Implications, 3rd edn. (Freeman, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Anderson, D. Sweeney and T. Williams, Quantitative Methods for Business, 7th edn. (West Publishing Company, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Armstrong, Online schools for computer skills, Training 36(1) (1999) 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.V. Belmonte, J. Berbel and R. Conejo, TEA: An agrarian economics instructor program, European Journal of Engineering Education 22(4) (1997) 389–399.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.F. Biehler and J. Snowman, Psychology Applied to Teaching, 6th edn. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L.H. Bilsky, S. Blachman, C. Chi, A.C. Mui and P.Winter, Comprehension strategies in math problem and story contexts, Cognition and Instruction 3(2) (1986) 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B.S. Bloom, The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as oneto-one tutoring, Educational Researcher 13 (1984) 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Cummins, W. Kintsch, K. Reusser and R. Weimer, The role of understanding in solving word problems, Cognitive Psychology 20(4) (1988) 405–438.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Clement, J. Lochhead and G. Monk, Translation difficulties in learning mathematics, American Mathematical Monthly 88 (1981) 286–290.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.A. Cohen, J.A. Kulik and C.C.Kulik, Educational outcomes of tutoring: Ameta-analysis of findings, American Educational Research Journal 19 (1982) 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Davis, Keynote address at AACSB new learning technologies in management education workshop, Boston (29–31 May 1997).

  14. G.D. Eppen, F.J. Gould, C.P. Schmidt, J.H. Moore and L.R. Weatherford, Introductory Management Science: Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.R. Evans, Creative Thinking in the Decision and Management Sciences (Southwestern Publishing Company, Cincinnati, OH, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Fuentes, Reading comprehension in mathematics, The Clearing House 72(2) (1998) 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Flystra, L. Lasdon, J. Watson and A. Waren, Design and use of the microsoft Excel solver, Interfaces 28(5) (1998) 29–55.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Goforth, Learner control = decision making + information: A model and meta-analysis, Journal of Educational Computing Research 11(1) (1994) 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S.C. Gold, The design of an ITS based business simulation: A new epistemiology for learning, Simulation and Gaming 29(4) (1998) 462–474.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Greengard, Drive change with long distance learning, Workforce 76(3) (1997) 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.G. Greeno, Some examples of cognitive task analysis with instructional implications, Technical Report no. 2, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Developmental Center (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.E. Hailey and C. Hailey, Hypermedia, multimedia, and reader cognition: An empirical study, Technical Communication 45(3) (1998) 330–342.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Hall, D. Kibler, E. Wenger and C. Truxaw, Exploring the episodic structure of algebra story problem solving, Cognition and Instruction 6(3) (1989) 223–283.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Hembree, The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 21(1) (1990) 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Jonassen, Hypertext as instructional design, Educational Technology Research and Development 39(1) (1991) 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Lawrence and B. Pasternack, Applied Management Science: A Computer-Integrated Approach for Decision Making (Wiley, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.S. Liebman, Teaching operations research: Lessons from cognitive psychology, Interfaces 28(2) (1998) 104–110.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Liu and L. Beamer, Multimedia as a teaching tool in business communication course delivery, Business Communication Quarterly 60(2) (1997) 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Lung and R.L. Dominowski, Effects of strategy instruction and practice on nine dot problem solving, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11 (1985) 804–811.

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. Mangan, Top business schools seek to ride a bull market in on-line MBA's, The Chronicle of Higher Education 45(19) (1999) A27–A28.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. Mayer, Memory for algebra story problems, Journal of Educational Psychology 74 (1982) 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. McArthur, C. Stasz and M. Zmuidzinas, Tutoring techniques in algebra, Cognition and Instruction 7(3) (1990) 197–244.

    Google Scholar 

  33. C.D. Mercer and A.R. Mercer, Teaching Students with Learning Problems, 3rd edn. (Merrill Publishing Company, OH, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. Milech, K. Kirsner, G. Roy and B.Waters, Applications of psychology to computer-based tutoring systems, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 5(1) (1993) 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  35. G. Morrison, S. Ross and J. Odell, Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics, Educational Technology Research and Development 40(2) (1992) 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. Nathan, W. Kintsch and E. Young, The theory of algebra-word-problem comprehension and its implications for the design of learning environments, Cognition and Instruction 9(4) (1992) 329–389.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Newell and H. Simon, Human Problem Solving (Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  38. O. O'sullivan, “Websizing” learning, US Banker 108(9) (1998) 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  39. P. Pirolli, Effects of examples and their explanations in a lesson on recursion: A production systems analysis, Cognition and Instruction 8(3) (1991) 207–259.

    Google Scholar 

  40. G. Polya, How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method, 2nd edn. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  41. S. Powell, The teacher's forum: Six key modeling heuristics, Interfaces 25(4) (1995) 114–125.

    Google Scholar 

  42. S. Powell, Leading the spreadsheet revolution: Making management science the best course in the business school, ORMS Today 24(4) (1997) 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  43. S. Reed and M. Ettinger, Usefulness of tables for solving word problems, Cognition and Instruction 4(1) (1987) 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  44. B. Schneiderman, Reflections on authoring, editing, and managing hypertext, in: The Society of Text: Hypertext, Hypermedia, and the Social Construction of Information, ed. E. Barrett (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  45. E.E. Schroeder and B.L. Grabowski, Patterns of exploration and learning with hypermedia, Journal of Educational Computing Research 13(4) (1995) 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  46. M. Sebrechts, M. Enright, R. Bennett and K. Martin, Using algebra to assess quantitiative ability: Attributes, strategies and errors, Cognition and Instruction 14(3) (1996) 285–343.

    Google Scholar 

  47. M. Thuring, J. Hannemann and J.M. Haake, Hypermedia and Cognition: Designing for Comprehension Communications of the ACM 38(8) (1995).

  48. M.Ward and J. Sweller, Structuring effective worked examples, Cognition and Instruction 7(1) (1990) 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  49. X. Zhu and H. Simon, Learning mathematics from examples and by doing, Cognition and Instruction 4(3) (1987) 137–166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, College of Business Administration, The University of Akron, 259 South Broadway, Akron, OH, 44325-4801, USA

    Ravindra Krovi

  2. Department of Business Administration, North Carolina A&T State University, 1601 East Market Street, Greensboro, NC, 27411, USA

    Joanne Sulek

Authors
  1. Ravindra Krovi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joanne Sulek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravindra Krovi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krovi, R., Sulek, J. The Effect of a Web-Based Tutorial on Problem Formulation Ability. Information Technology and Management 2, 419–442 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011402701868

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011402701868

Search

Navigation