Abstract
This paper offers a new approach to the philosophical foundations of information systems (IS) through feminist philosophy and, in particular, feminist epistemology. This can be used to expose the universalizing tendency of many information systems and to show the importance of using real-life complex examples rather than the simplified examples often favored by philosophers. Within traditional epistemology and its relation to IS, subjectivity, the propositional/skills distinction and epistemic hierarchies are subject to arguments from feminist epistemology. With respect to the emerging critical school of IS, feminist epistemology, and within that, feminist standpoint theory, are used to examine the complexities of the positivist/anti-positivist position and the related concept of emancipation. In addition, it is argued that the liberal version of emancipation encapsulated in such systems may have an effect opposite to that of emancipation These issues are illustrated in an existing expert systems project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam A. Artificial Knowing: Gender and the Thinking Machine. London, New York: Routledge, 1998.
Adam A, Emms J, Green E, Owen J. (Eds). IFIP Transactions A-57, Women, Work and Computerization: Breaking Old Boundaries, Building New Forms. Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland, 1994.
Addelson KP. Moral Passages: Toward a Collectivist Moral Theory. New York, London: Routledge, 1994.
Alcoff L, Potter E. (Eds). Feminist Epistemologies. New York, London: Routledge, 1993.
Assiter A. Enlightened Women: Modernist Feminism in a Postmodern Age. London, New York: Routledge, 1996.
Bjerknes G, Bratteteig T. FLORENCE in wonderland: System development with nurses. In: Bjerknes G, Ehn P. and Kyng M, eds. Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge. Aldershot, UK: Avebury, 1987:279–295.
Bloor D. Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1991.
Camp T. The Incredible Shrinking Pipeline. Comm. ACM 1997; 40:103–110.
Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A. The Psychology of Human Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.
Checkland P, Holwell S. Information, Systems and Information Systems—Making Sense of the Field. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1998.
Churchman CW. The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization. New York: Basic Books, 1971.
Churchman CW. The Systems Approach and its Enemies. New York: Basic Books, 1979.
Code L. Taking subjectivity into account. In: Alcoff L and Potter E, eds. Feminist Epistemologies. New York, London: Routledge, 1993:15–48.
Cohen C. 101 Problems in Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge, 1999.
Dalmiya V, Alcoff L. Are ‘old wives' tales’ justified? In: Alcoff L and Potter E, eds. Feminist Epistemologies. New York, London: Routledge, 1993:217–244.
Ehrenreich B, English D. For Her Own Good: 150 Years of the Experts' Advice to Women. London: Pluto Press, 1979.
Green E, Adam A (Eds). Information, Communication and Society, 1999;2(4). London, NewYork: Routledge. Special issue on gender and information and communications technology.
Haraway D. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: Haraway D, ed. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books, 1991:183–201.
Harding S. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991.
Hekman S. Gender and Knowledge: Elements of a Postmodern Feminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1990.
Hirschheim R. Information systems epistemology: An historical perspective. In: Research Methods in Information Systems, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 Colloquium Manchester Business School, 1–3 Sept., 1984, Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitzgerald G, and Wood-Harper T, eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985:13–36.
Hirschheim R, Klein H, Lyytinen K. Information Systems Development: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge, UK, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
Lenat D, Guha R. Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990.
Lyotard JF. The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1979.
Meehan J (ed). Feminists read Habermas; Gendering the Subject of Discourse. New York, London: Routledge, 1995.
Newell A. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Newell A, Simon H. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
Rose H. Love, Power and Language: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1994.
Ryle G. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson, 1963. (original edition 1949).
Schank R, Jona M. Issues for psychology, AI, and education: A review of Newell's Unified Theories of Cognition. Artificial Intelligence, 1993;59:375–388.
Soar (1996). Frequently asked questions list online. Available: http://www.psyc.nott.ac.uk/users/ritter/soar-faq.html, March 29, 1996. Alternatively contact: Frank Ritter Dept. of Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK.
Tannen D. You Just don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago, 1992.
Wagner I. Women's voice: The case of nursing information systems. AI & Society 1993;7:295–310.
Wilson F. The truth is out there: The search for emancipatory principles in information design. Information Technology and People, 1997;3:187–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adam, A., Richardson, H. Feminist Philosophy and Information Systems. Information Systems Frontiers 3, 143–154 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011487221497
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011487221497