Skip to main content
Log in

An Economic Model to Study Dependencies between Independent Software Vendors and Application Service Providers

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Application outsourcing refers to the emerging trend of deploying applications over the Internet, rather than installing them in the local environment. This shifts the burden of installing, maintaining, and upgrading an application from the application user to the remote Application Service Provider (ASP). The ASP takes over all server administration and application management tasks. This deployment model allows applications to be distributed on a highly differentiable basis. This is in contrast to the traditional license-based software distribution model, where a customer receives “all-or-nothing” of the product and must manage the application on its own. To better understand dependencies between these two distribution models we propose an economic model to study the effects of actions of an independent software vendor on the profitability of an application service provider.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhargava, H.K., V. Choudhary, R. Krishnan, and K.B. Lee. (1999). “Analysis of an Intermediary's Strategies in Electronic Markets for Decision Technology.” In International Conference on Information Systems, December.

  • Bulow, J., J. Geanakoplos, and P. Klemperer. (1985). “Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements.” Journal of Political Economy 93(3), 487–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burney, K., and C. Hecht. (1999). “ASPs Must Focus on Their “Natural Markets” if They Are to Succeed.” URL: http://www.instat.com/pr/1999/oc9902mp_pr.htm (Internet publication), August 24th.

  • Buckman, R. (2000). “Microsoft Unveils New Platform for Computing.” The Wallstreet Journal Europe, Friday-Saturday, June 23rd-24th.

  • Choudhary, V., K. Tomak, and A. Chaturvedi. (1998). “Economic Benefits of Software Renting.” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 8(4), 277–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., and A.M. Odlyzko. (1998). “Dynamic Behavior of Differential Pricing and Quality of Service Options for the Internet.” In Proceedings of the first International Conference on Information and Computation Economies, pp. 128–139.

  • Foley, M.J. (1999). “Oracle to Sell to ASPs? Over Ellison's Dead Body.” URL: http://www.zdnet.com/filters/printerfriendly/0,6061,1017536–54,00.html (Internet publication), October 6, 8:46 AM PT.

  • Foley, M.J. (2000). “PeopleSoft Joins the Hosting Parade.” URL: http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/ news/0,4538,57009,00.html (Internet publication), March 7.

  • Gardner, D. (1999). “Sun to Acquire StarOffice for Hosted Applications.” Posted at 1:29 PM PT, August 27. URL: <http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?990827.ecsunstar.htm> (Internet publication).

  • Gilbert, A., and J. Sweat. (1999). “Reinventing ERP.” URL: http://www.informationweek.com/752/ erp.htm (Internet publication), September 13.

  • Gill, P.J. (1999). “ERP: Keep It Simple.” URL: http://www.informationweek.com/747/47aderp. htm (Internet publication), August 9.

  • Girard, K. (2000). “The Battle over Renting Software.” URL: http://news.cnet.com/news/ 0–1008–200–1538592.html (Internet publication), February 1, 8:15 A.M. PT.

  • Jacobsen, H.-A., and O. Günther. (1999). “Middleware for Software Leasing over the Internet.” In First ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'99), Denver, Colerado, November, pp. 87–95.

  • Jacobsen, H.-A., O. Günther, and G. Riessen. (2000). “Component Leasing on the World Wide Web.” NETNOMICS Journal (accepted for publication).

  • Katz, M., and C. Shapiro. (1999). “Antitrust in Software Markets.” In J.A. Eisenach and T.M. Lenard (Eds.), Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louderback, J. (2000). “Why the Monthly Fee Model Won't Survive.” URL: http://www.zdnet.com/ filters/printerfriendly/0,6061,2449343–54,00.html (Internet publication), February 25, 6:30 AM PT.

  • Luening, E. (1998). “Will Hosting Boost or Bruise Software Makers?” URL: http://news.cnet.com/ news/0–1008–200–346773.html (Internet publication), September 3, 9:05 a.m. PT.

  • Noll, A.M. (1997). “Internet Pricing vs. Reality.” Communication of the ACM 40(8), 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C., and H. Varian. (1998). Information Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprott, D. (2000). “Componentizing the Enterprise Application Packages.” Communication of the ACM 43(4).

  • Sun Microsystems. (2000). “On the Horizon: StarPortal[tm] Software.” URL: http://www.sun.com/ products/staroffice/starportal/ (Internet publication).

  • Wilson, T. (1999). “ERP's New Web Visage: SAP, PeopleSoft Embrace the Net.” URL: http://www. internetwk.com/story/INW19990902S0003 (Internet publication), September 2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchand, N., Jacobsen, HA. An Economic Model to Study Dependencies between Independent Software Vendors and Application Service Providers. Electronic Commerce Research 1, 315–334 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011502306766

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011502306766

Navigation