Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Explanation, Representation and the Dynamical Hypothesis

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper challenges arguments that systematic patterns of intelligent behavior license the claim that representations must play a role in the cognitive system analogous to that played by syntactical structures in a computer program. In place of traditional computational models, I argue that research inspired by Dynamical Systems theory can support an alternative view of representations. My suggestion is that we treat linguistic and representational structures as providing complex multi-dimensional targets for the development of individual brains. This approach acknowledges the indispensability of the intentional or representational idiom in psychological explanation without locating representations in the brains of intelligent agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Bechtel, W. (1998), 'Representations and cognitive explanations', Cognitive Science 22, pp. 295–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, R.D. (1995a), 'Computational and Dynamical Languages for Autonomous Agents', in R. Port and T. Van Gelder, eds., Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, R.D. (1995b), 'A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction', Artificial Intelligence 72, pp. 173–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, G. (1992), 'A Connectionist Parser with Recursive Sentence Structure and Lexical Disambiguation', Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-92), 32–37.

  • Brooks, R. (1991), 'Intelligence without reason' in Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemero, A. (2000), 'Anti-representationalism and the Dynamical Stance', Philosophy of Science.

  • Chomsky, N. (1959), A review of B.F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior, Language 35, pp. 26–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1997), Being There, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N.J. and Eichenbaum, H. (1995), Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal System, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1999), 'The Emergence of Thought', Erkenntnis.

  • Deacon, T. (1998), The Symbolic Species, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1977), A cure for the common code. Mind. Reprinted in Brainstorms (MIT Press, 1978).

  • Dennett, D. (1988), 'Précis of The Intentional Stance', Brain and Behavioral Sciences 11, pp. 495–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G.M. (1987), Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection, New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasmith, C. (1997), 'The third contender: a critical examination of the dynamicist theory of cognition', Journal of Philosophical Psychology 9(4): 441–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J. (1987), Psychosemantics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. and Z. Pylyshyn (1988), 'Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis', Cognition 28: 3–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. and B. McLaughlin (1990), 'Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution doesn't work', Cognition 35: 183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. (1988), Why neural networks don't yet fly: Inquiry into the neurodynamics of biological intelligence, Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks 2, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. (1990), 'Searching for signal and noise in the chaos of brain waves', in S. Krasner, ed., The ubiquity of chaos (pp. 47–55). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. (1991), 'The Physiology of Perception', Scientific American, February, 35–41.

  • Freeman, W.J. and Baird, B. (1987), Relation of Olfactory EEG to Behavior: Spatial Analysis, Behavioral Neuroscience 101, 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J. (1988), Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, J. (1997), 'Syntax in a Dynamic Brain', Synthese, 110, 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T.E. and Tienson, J. (1993), 'Levels of Description in Nonclassical Cognitive Science', Philosophy 34, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 159–188.

  • Horgan, T.E. and Tienson, J. (1996), Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J. A. S. (1995), Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J.A.S., DelColle, J. and Sch+ner, G. (1990), 'Action-perception as a pattern formation process', in M. Jeannerod, ed., Attention and Performance XIII, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 139–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1980), 'Physical Symbol Systems', Cognitive Science 4, 135–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, J.B. (1991), 'The Induction of Dynamical Recognizers', Machine Learning 7: 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Port, R. and van Gelder, T.J. (1995), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1988), Representation and Reality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1960), Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarda, C. and Freeman W.J., (1987), 'How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10, 161–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (1998), 'Approximate Truth and Dynamical Theories', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49, 253–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S. (1996), Deconstructing the Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, J. (forthcoming), Co-evolutionary Models of the Emergence of Language.

  • Thagard, P. (1997) Mind: An Introduction to Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E. and Smith, L.B. (1994), A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder, T.J. (1995), 'What might cognition be, if not computation?' Journal of Philosophy 91, 345–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder, T.J. and Port, R. (1995), 'It's About Time: An Overview of the Dynamical Approach to Cognition', in R. Port and T. van Gelder, eds., Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder, T. (1998), 'The Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, 79968, USA

    John Symons

Authors
  1. John Symons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Symons, J. Explanation, Representation and the Dynamical Hypothesis. Minds and Machines 11, 521–541 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011859328855

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011859328855