Skip to main content
Log in

A study of collaboration in laser science and technology

  • Other Index
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of 3174 papers published in journals in the field of laserscience and technology indicate that only 401 papers were single authoredand the rest 2773 were co-authored papers. Of the 2773 papers, only 687 werewritten in local (inter-departmental), domestic (inter-institutional) andinternational collaboration. As reflected by the values of collaborative coefficientand co-authorship index, it is observed that the proportion of mega-authoredpapers for Japan, France, Italy, and the Netherlands was more, while for Canada,China, and Australia the proportion of single authored papers was more. Mostof the collaborative papers had bilateral domestic and international collaboration.Domestic collaborations were higher for USA, Japan, France and Australia,while international collaboration was higher for China, Israel, the Netherlands,and Switzerland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 1998 (National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 1998), pp. 5-43, 5-44, A-310 and appendix Table 5-52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. De. B. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration I. The professional origin of scientific co-authorship, Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65-84. II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 133-149, III Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship, Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 231-245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Subramanyam, Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review, J. Inf. Sci., 6 (1983) 33-38.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Qin, An investigation of research collaboration in the sciences through the Philosophical Transactions, Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 219-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. D. Frame, M. P. Carpenter, International research collaboration, Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 481-497.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. J. W. Tijssen, H. F. Moed, Literature-based statistical analysis of international scientific cooperation, In: Science and Technology Indicators, Leiden, and DSWO Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Luukkonen, R. J. W. Tijssen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen, The Measurement of international scientific collaboration, Scientometrics, 28 (1993) 15-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Schubert, T. Braun, International collaboration in the sciences, 1981-1998, Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 3-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Melin, O. Persson, Studying research collaboration using co-authorship, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 363-377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. De Lange, W. GlÄnzel, Modeling and measuring multilateral co-authorship in international scientific collaboration Part I: Development of a new model using a series expansion approach, Scientometrics, 49 (1997) 593-604. Part II: A Comparative study on the extent and change of international scientific collaboration links, Scientometrics, 40 (1997) 605-626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. M. Gupta, C. R. Karisiddappa, Collaboration in theoretical population genetics specialty, Scientometrics, 42 (1998) 349-376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B. M. Gupta, S. Kumar, C. R. Karisiddappa: Collaboration profile of theoretical population genetics specialty, Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 293-314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Kundra, Investigation of collaborative research trends in Indian medical sciences 1900-1945, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 69-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Bordons, I. GÓmez, M. T. FernÁndez, M. A. Zulueta, A. MÉndez, Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research, Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 279-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Arunachalam, R. Srinivasan, V. Raman, International collaboration in science: participation by the Asian Giants, Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 7-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. S. Katz, B. R. Martin, What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26 (1997) 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K. C. Garg, P. Padhi, Scientometrics of laser research literature as viewed through the Journal of Current Laser Abstracts, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 251-268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. K. C. Garg, P. Padhi, Scientometrics of institutional productivity in laser science and technology, Scientometrics, 46 (1999) 19-38.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K.C. Garg, P. Padhi, Scientometrics of prolific and non-prolific authors in laser science and technology, Scientometrics, 49 (2000) 359-371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Granberg, A bibliometric study of laser research in Sweden, West Germany and Japan, Research Policy Institute (Sweden) 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Jain, K. C. Garg, Laser research in India: Scientometric study and model projections, Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 395-415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. U. N. Singh, S. Arunachalam, Profile of laser research in middle level countries: a scientometric analysis of publication productivity and citation impact, In: I. K. R. Rao (Ed.) Informetrics 91: Selected papers from the Third International Conference on Informetrics, Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, Bangalore,1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. van Vianen, A. van Raan, Knowledge expansion in applied science: A bibliometric study of laser medicine and polyimide chemistry, In: H. Grupp (Ed.) Dynamics of Science Based Innovations, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. C. M. Noyons, A. F. J. van Raan, H. Grupp, U. Schmoch, Exploring the science and technology interface: Inventor-author relations in laser medicine research, Research Policy, 23 (1994) 443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Vlachy, World trends, publication output, research fronts and highly cited papers in optics, lasers and quantum electronics, Czech. J. Phys., B37 (1987) 257-272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. K. C. Garg, P. Padhi, Scientometric study of laser patent literature, Scientometrics, 43 (1998) 443-454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. I. Ajiferuke, Q. Burrel, J. Tague, Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research, Scientometrics. 14 (1988) 421-433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. D. De Solla Price, D. De B. Beaver, Collaboration in an invisible college, American Psychologist, 21 (1966) 1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D. De Solla Price, The analysis of scientomeric metrics for policy implications, Scientometrics, 3 (1981) 47-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. J. D. Frame, Mainstream research in Latin America and Caribbean, Interciencia, 2 (1977) 143-148.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Schubert, T. Braun, Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 281-291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. P.S. Nagpaul, Transnational linkages of Indian Science: A structural analysis, Scientometrics, 46 (1999) 109-140.

    Google Scholar 

  33. OECD, Science and Technology Policy: Review and Outlook, Paris 1992, pp. 69-79.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garg, K., Padhi, P. A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics 51, 415–427 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012709919544

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012709919544

Navigation