Abstract
Connectionist networks have been used to model a wide range of cognitivephenomena, including developmental, neuropsychological and normal adultbehaviours. They have offered radical alternatives to traditional accounts ofwell-established facts about cognition. The primary source of the success ofthese models is their sensitivity to statistical regularities in their trainingenvironment. This paper provides a brief description of the connectionisttoolbox and how this has developed over the past 2 decades, with particularreference to the problem of reading aloud.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.REFERENCES
Plaut, D., J. McClelland, M. Seidenberg, and K. Patterson: 1996, ‘Understanding Normal and Impaired Reading: Computational Principles in Quasi-Regular Domains’, Psychological Review 103, 56-115.
Plaut, D. C. and T. Shallice: 1993, ‘Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of Connectionist Neuropsychology’, Cognitive Neuropsychology 10(5), 377-500.
Rumelhart, D. and J. McClelland: 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Seidenberg, M. S. and J. L. McClelland: 1989, ‘A Distributed, Developmental Model of Word Recognition and Naming’, Psychological Review 96(4), 523-568.
Sejnowski, T. and C. Rosenberg: 1986, ‘NETtalk: A Parallel Network that Learns to Read Aloud’, The Johns Hopkins University Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Technical Report, JHU/EECS-86/01.
Zorzi, M., G. Houghton, and B. Butterworth.: 1998, ‘The Development of Spelling-Sound Relationships in a Model of Phonological Reading’, Language and Cognitive Processes 12(5/6).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plunkett, K. Connectionism Today. Synthese 129, 185–194 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013099222414
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013099222414