Skip to main content
Log in

On a Mathematical Comparison between Hierarchy and Network with a Classification of Coordination Structures

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a mathematical model to compare a network organization with a hierarchical organization. In order to formulate the model, we define a three-dimensional framework of the coordination structure of a network and of other typical coordination structures. In the framework, we can define a network structure by contrasting it with a hierarchy, in terms of the distribution of decision making, which is one of the main features of information processing. Based on this definition, we have developed a mathematical model for evaluating coordination structures. Using this model, we can derive two boundary conditions among the coordination structures with respect to the optimal coordination structure. The boundary conditions help us to understand why an organization changes its coordination structure from a hierarchy to a network and what factors cause this change. They enable us, for example, to find points of structural change where the optimal coordination structure shifts from a hierarchy to a hierarchy with delegation or from a hierarchy with delegation to a network, when the nature of the task changes from routine to non-routine. In conclusion, our framework and model may provide a basis for discussing the processes that occur when coordination structures change between a hierarchy and a network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T.J. and O. Hauptman (1987), “The Influence of Communication Technologies on Organizational Structure—A Conceptual Model for Future Research—, ” Communication Research, 14(5), 575–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alstyne, M. (1997), “The State of Network Organization: A Survey in Three Frameworks, ” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 7(2/3), 83–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. (1970), “A Formal Theory of Differentiation in Organizations, ” American Sociological Review, 35, 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. (1999), “Organizational Change and the Digital Economy: A Computational Organization Science Perspective, ” in Brynjolfsson, Erik and B. Kahin (Eds.) Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, Research. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. and M.J. Preietula (Eds.) (1994), Computational Organization Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. and D.M. Svoboda (1996), “Modeling Organizational Adaptation as a Simulated Annealing Process, ” Sociological Methods and Research, 25(1), 138–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1037), “The Nature of the Firm, ” Economica, 4, 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emarson, R.M. (1962), “Power Dependence Relations, ” American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.R. (1977), Organization Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1993), “Explaining the Swollen Middle: Why Most Transactions are a Mix of Market and Hierarchy, ” Organization Science, 4(4), 529–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishida, K. (1998), “A Study of Cooperative Aspect of Collective Phenomena Based on an Operational Organization Model, ” Doctoral thesis, Graduate Department of Information Network Science, Graduate School of Information Systems, University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishida, K., T. Yamamoto and T. Ohta (1996), “A Mathematical Study of Organizational Structure and Information Technology, ” Journal of the Japan Society for Management Information, 5(1), 19–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J.H. and C.P. Morgan (1978), Organization Theory.

  • Koontz, H., C. O'Donnell and H. Weihrich (1984), Management, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. and J. Lorsch (1967), Organization and Environment. Harvard Business School, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W. (1987), “Modeling Coordination in Organizations and Markets, ” Management Science, 33(10), 1317–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W. and S.A. Smith (1988), “Modeling the Performance of Organizational Structures, ” Operations Research, 36(3), 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W., J. Yetes and R.I. Benjamin (1987), “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies, ” Communications of ACM, 30(6), 484–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G and H.A. Simon (1958), Organizations. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G and J.P. Olsen (1976), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Universitetsforlaget.

  • Marchak, J and R. Radner (1972), Economic Theory of Teams. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, T., T. Yamamoto and K. Ishida (1994), “On a Coordination Model among Heterogeneous Agents in Cooperative Environment, ” APORS'94 Abstracts. p. 120.

  • Powell, W.W. (1990), “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization, ” in B. Staw and T. Cummings (Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, 295–336.

  • Raymond, E.S. (1998), The Cathedral and the Bazaar, http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedralbazaar/ cathedral-bazaar.html.

  • Scott, W.R. (1975), “Organizational Structure, ” Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. (1967), Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffin, J. and E.J. McCormick (1965), Industrial Psychology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1986), Economic Organization. Wheatsheaf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishida, K., Ohta, T. On a Mathematical Comparison between Hierarchy and Network with a Classification of Coordination Structures. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 7, 311–330 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013454200524

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013454200524

Navigation