Skip to main content
Log in

On the Evaluation of Uncertain Courses of Action

  • Published:
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of decision making under uncertainty. The fuzzy measure is introduced as a general way of representing available information about the uncertainty. It is noted that generally in uncertain environments the problem of comparing alternative courses of action is difficult because of the multiplicity of possible outcomes for any action. One approach is to convert this multiplicity of possible of outcomes associated with an alternative into a single value using a valuation function. We describe various ways of providing a valuation function when the uncertainty is represented using a fuzzy measure. We then specialize these valuation functions to the cases of probabilistic and possibilistic uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernstein, P. L. (1998). Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykin, S. (1994). Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. New York: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. and D. P. Filev. (1994) Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling and Control. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1996). “Fuzzy logic = computing with words,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 4, 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. (1988). “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18, 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, M. (1990). “Using maximum entropy-ordered weighted averaging to construct a fuzzy neuron,” Proceedings 24th Annual IEEE Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Pacific Grove, Ca: Systems and Computers, pp. 618–623.

  • Dyckhoff, H. and W. Pedrycz. (1984). “Generalized means as model of compensative connectives,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 14, 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1978). “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugeno, M. (1974). “Theory of fuzzy integrals and its application,” Doctoral Thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology.

  • Sugeno, M. (1977). “Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals: a survey.” In M. M. Gupta, G. N. Saridis, and B. R. Gaines (eds.), Fuzzy Automata and Decision Process. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub., pp. 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. and H. Prade. (1988). Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1979). “A theory of approximate reasoning,” In J. Hayes, D. Michie, and L. I. Mikulich (eds.), Machine Intelligence, Vol. 9. New York: Halstead Press, pp. 149–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. (2000). “On the entropy of fuzzy measures,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Sets and Systems 8, 453–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murofushi, T. (1992) “A technique for reading fuzzy measures (i): the Shapely value with respect to a fuzzy measure,” Proceedings Second Fuzzy Workshop, Nagaoka, Japan (in Japanese), 39–48.

  • Grabisch, M. (1977). “Alternative representations of OWA operators,” In R. R. Yager and K. Kacprzyk (eds.), The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, G. (1953). “Theory of Capacities,” Annales de l'Institut Fourier 5, 131–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denneberg, D. (1994). Non-Additive Measure and Integral. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch, M. (1977). “Fuzzy measures and integrals: A survey of applications and recent issues,” In D. Dubois, H. Prade, and R. R. Yager (eds.), Fuzzy Information Engineering: A Guided Tour of Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 507–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. and H. Prade. (1995). “Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory,” Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Montreal, pp. 1924–1930.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yager, R.R. On the Evaluation of Uncertain Courses of Action. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 1, 13–41 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013715523644

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013715523644

Navigation