Skip to main content
Log in

Productivity ratings of institutions based on publication in Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics, 1981–2000

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author surveyed a set of ten scholarly journals that publish the mainstream of papers in the field of Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics (SIB). The survey is limited only to the research articles published in the field for the two decades period 1981–2000. Each journal was examined issue by issue for the institutional affiliations of contributing authors. Institutional rankings for the total period and the two decade periods; 1981–1990 and 1991–2000 were determined by awarding credit to the authors" institutions based on authorship. In the composite of ten journals, the University Sheffield (England), the University of North Carolina (USA), the University of Leiden (Netherlands), the City University of London (England), the National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (India), the University of Sussex (England), the University of Illinois (USA), the University of Michigan (USA), the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Library (Hungary), and Indiana University (USA) emerged as the ten most productive institutions for the period 1981–2000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. M. Gupta, S. Kumar, B. S. Aggarwal, A comparison of productivity of male and female scientists of CSIR, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 269-289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Prpic, The publication productivity of young scientists: An empirical study, Scientometrics, 49 (2000) 453-490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. R. Babu, Y. P. Singh, Determinants of research productivity, Scientometrics, 43 (1998) 309-329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Uzun, M. E. Ozel, Publication patterns of Turkish astronomers, Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 159-169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Uzun, A bibliometric analysis of physics publications from Middle Eastern countries, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 259-269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. C. Garg, P. Padhi, Scientometrics of institutional productivity of laser science and technology, Scientometrics, 46 (1999) 19-38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. A. Abt, Institutional Productivities, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 105 (1993) 794-798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Basu, P. S. Nagpaul, National Mapping of Science, NISTADS Report: No. Rep-248/98, New Delhi, (1998) 157-169.

  9. J. P. Perdew, F. J. Tipler, Ranking the physics departments, Physics Today, October (1996) 96-97.

  10. J. L. Johns, A Study of Institutional Productivity in “Reading World”: 1978-1983, ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED 248 490, Northern Illinois University (1983).

  11. R. W. Thoresen, C. J. Kraauskopf, J. G. Cox, Reputation, halo, and ratings of counseling programs, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22 (1975) 446-450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Noyons, Mapping Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics, CWTS Projects, (1998), http://shara.fsw.leidenuniv.nl/ed/sib/home.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uzun, A. Productivity ratings of institutions based on publication in Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics, 1981–2000. Scientometrics 53, 297–307 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014864827441

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014864827441

Keywords

Navigation