Skip to main content
Log in

Mixed-Signal Circuit Classification in a Pseudo-Random Testing Scheme

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pseudo-random testing techniques for mixed-signal circuits offer several advantages compared to explicit time-domain and frequency-domain test methods, especially in a BIST structure. To fully exploit these advantages a suitable choice of the pseudo-random input parameters should be done and an investigation on the accuracy of the circuit response samples needed to reduce the risk of misclassification should be carried out. Here these issues have been addressed for a testing scheme based on the estimation of the impulse response of the device under test (DUT) by means of input-output cross-correlation. Moreover, new acceptance criteria for the DUT are suggested which solve some ambiguity problems arising if the classification of the DUT as good or bad is based on a few samples of the cross-correlation function. Examples of application of the proposed techniques to real cases are also shown in order to assess the impact of the measurement system inaccuracies on the reliability of the test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Al-Dabbagh, M. Darnell, A. Noble, and S. Farquhar, “Accurate System Identification using Inputs with Imperfect Autocorrelation Properties,” IEE Electronics Letters, vol. 33, no. 17, 1997.

  2. M. Ciampi, G. Del Corso, and L. Verrazzani, Teoria dei segnali: Segnali aleatori, ETS publisher, 1994.

  3. A. Di Giandomenico, P. Greco, O. Wiedenbauer, F. Corsi, and C. Marzocca, “Testing a High Speed Embedded Analogue Filter by a Low Cost Digital Tester,” in 6th International Mixed-Signal Testing Workshop, Montpellier, June 2000.

  4. M. Mahoney, DSP-Based Testing of Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuits, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1987.

  5. L. Milor and A.L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, “Minimizing Production Test Time to Detect Faults in Analog Circuits,” IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 13, no. 6, 1995.

  6. C.Y. Pan and K.T. Cheng, “Pseudo-Random Testing And Signature Analysis for Mixed-Signal Circuits,” in IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design ICCAD95, 1995.

  7. C.Y. Pan and K.T. Cheng, “Pseudo-Random Testing for Mixed-Signal Circuits,” in IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, vol. 16, no. 10, 1997.

  8. J.A. Tofte, C.K. Ong, J.L. Huang, and K.T. Cheng, “Characterization of a Pseudo-Random Testing Technique for Analog and Mixed-Signal Built-In-Self-Test,” in 18th VLSI Test Symposium, 2000.

  9. Z. Wang and G. Gielen, “Probabilistic Fault Detection and the Selection of Measurements for Analog Integrated Circuits,” IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 17, no. 9, 1998.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marzocca, C., Corsi, F. Mixed-Signal Circuit Classification in a Pseudo-Random Testing Scheme. Journal of Electronic Testing 18, 333–342 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015091324076

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015091324076

Navigation