Abstract
This paper analyses the collaborative design ofa high-technology product, a neuromagnetometerused in the analysis of the activity of thehuman cortex. The producer, Neuromag Company istrying to transform the device from a basicresearch instrument into a means of clinicalpractice. This transition is analyzed as asimultaneous evolution of the product,producer-user network and user activities. Thenetwork is analyzed as a network of activitysystems. Each activity has a historicallyformed object and a motive of its own, as wellas a system of cultural means and expertise. Weuse these to explain and understand theinterests and points of view of the actors inrelation to the product and the contradictionsof the producer-user network. It is suggestedthat the emerging user needs of collectiveactors must be analyzed at three levels. At thefirst level, the use value of the product, itscapacity of solving the vital problems andchallenges of developing user activities, ischaracterized. The second-level analysisconcerns the creation and development of thenecessary complementary tools and services thatmake the implementation and use of the productpossible. This task presupposes collaborationbetween several communities of the innovationnetwork. The third level is the situatedpractical use of the product. In ourexperience, it is advantageous that researcherscontribute with their data to a dialogue inwhich the user needs are articulated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, P. and T.A. Winograd (1990): Usability. Turning Technologies into Tools. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beyer, H. and K. Holzblatt (1998): Contextual Design. Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Blume, S. (1992): Insight and Industry. On the Dynamics of Technological Change in Medicine. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Brun-Cotton, F. and P. Wall (1995): Using Video to Re-Present the User. Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 61–71.
Cole, M. and Y. Engeström (1993): A Cultural-Historical Approach to Distributed Cognition. In G. Salomon (ed.): Distributed Cognition. Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–46.
Constant, E.W. (1984): Communities and Hierarchies: Structure in the Practice of Science and Technology. In R. Laudan (ed.): The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 27–46.
Corbett, J., L. Rasmussen and F. Rauner (1991): Crossing the Border. The Social and Engineering Design of Integrated Manufacturing Systems. London: Springer Verlag.
Den Hertog. P., J.A. Stein, J. Schot and D. Gritzalis (1996): User Involvement in RTD: Concepts, Practices and Policy Lessons. TNO-Report STB/96/011. TNO Centre for Technology and Policy Studies.
Engeström, Y. (1987): Learning by Expanding. An Activity Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. and V. Escalante (1996): Mundane Tool or Object of Affection? The Rise and Fall of Postal Buddy. In B. Nardi (ed.): Activity theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 325–373.
Engeström, Y. and M. Cole (1997): Situated Cognition in the Search of Agenda. In D. Kirsher and J.A. Whitson (eds.): Situated Cognition. Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum, pp. 301–309.
Engeström, Y., R. Miettinen and R-L. Punamäki (eds.) (1999): Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, C. (1991): Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues. Research Policy, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 499–514.
Green, K. (1992): Creating Demand for Biotechnology: Shaping Technologies and Markets. In R. Coombs, P. Saviotti and V. Walsh (eds.): Technological Change and Company Strategies. London: Academic Press, pp. 164–184.
Hari, R. and O.V. Lounasmaa (1989): Recording and Interpretation of Cerebral Magnetic Fields. Science, vol. 244, pp. 432–436.
Hasu, M. (2000): Blind Men and the Elephant: Implementation of a New Artifact as an Expansive Possibility. Outlines, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–41.
Hasu, M. and Y. Engeström (2000): Measurement in Action. An Activity-Theoretical Perspective on Producer-User Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 61–89.
Heiskanen, E. and M. Niva (1996): A Bird's-Eye View on Users and Usefulness. Take a Look at the Users. Seminar Papers September 3. Helsinki: Finnish National Consumer Research Centre, pp. 5–21.
Herstatt, C. and E. von Hippel (1992): From Experience: Developing New Product Concepts via Lead User Method: A Case from a “Low-Tech” Field. Journal of Production and Innovation Management, vol. 9, pp. 213–221.
Howell, J. (1997): Rethinking the Market-Technology Relationship for Innovation. Research Policy, vol. 25, pp. 1209–1219.
Hughes, T. (1987): The Evolving of Large Technological Systems. In W.E. Bijker, T. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds.): The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 51–82.
Hämäläinen, M., R. Hari, R. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila and O.V. Lounasmaa (1993): Magnetoencephalography – Theory, Instrumentation, and Applications to Noninvasive Studies of the Working Human Brain. Review of Modern Physics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 414–497.
Kotler, P. (1991): Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kuutti, K. (1996): Activity Theory as Potential Framework for Human-Computer Interaction Research. In B. Nardi, (ed.): Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge.MA: The MIT Press, pp. 17–44.
Latour, B. (1987): Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Leont'ev, A.N. (1978): Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lewine, J.D. and W.W. Orrison (1995): Spike and Slow Wave Localization by Magnetoencephalography. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 575–595.
Lindell, M. (1991): Developing New Products – an Action, Interaction and Contextual Approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 3, pp. 173–189.
Lounasmaa, O.V., M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari and R. Salmelin (1996): Information Processing in the Human Brain: Magnetoencephalographic Approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 93, pp. 8809–8815.
Lundvall, B-Å. (1988): Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 349–370.
Miettinen, R. (1993): Methodological Issues of Studying Innovation-Related Networks. Group for Technology Studies. Working Papers no 4. Espoo: Technical Research Centre of Finland.
Miettinen, R. (1998): Object Formation and Networks in Research Work. The Case of Research on Cellulose Degrading Enzymes. Social Studies of Science, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 423–463.
Miettinen, R. (1999): Riddle of Things. Activity Theory and actor Network Theory as Approaches of Studying Innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, vol. 6, no 3, pp. 170–195.
Mowery, D. and N. Rosenberg (1979): The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies. Research Policy, vol. 8, pp. 102–153.
Nardi, B.A. (1996): Studying Context. A Comparison of Activity Theory, Situated Action Models, and Distributed Cognition. In B.A. Nardi, (ed.): Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 69–102.
Normann, R. and R. Ramírez (1993): FromValue Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy. Harvard Business Review (July–August), pp. 65–77.
Normann, R. and R. Ramírez (1994): Designing Interactive Strategy. Chichester: John Viley & Sons.
Pinch, T.J. and W.E. Bijker (1987): The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. In W.E. Bijker, T. Hudges and T. Pinch (eds.): The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 17–50.
Powell, W.W. (1990): Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Networks Forms of Organization. In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.): Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 12, pp. 295–336.
Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput and K. Smith (1996): Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus on Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 41, pp. 116–145.
Rothwell, R. (1992): Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, vol. 22, no 3, pp. 221–239.
Toikka, K. and R. Kuivanen (1993): Häiriöt kehitysmahdollisuutena. Tekniikan, organisaation ja työtavan kehitys joustavassa valmistusjärjestelmässä (In Finnish) (English title: Developmental Potential of Disturbances. The Development of Technology, Organization and Work in the Implementation of Flexible Manufacturing System). Helsinki: Metalliteollisuuden Keskusliitto.
Vicario, S. and G. Troilo (1998): Errors and Learning in Organizations. In von G. Krogh, J. Roos and D. Kleine (eds.): Knowing in Firms. London: SAGE, pp. 204–222.
von Hippel, E. (1976): The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process. Research Policy, vol. 5, pp. 212–239.
von Hippel, E. (1986): Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 791–805.
von Hippel, E. (1988): The Sources of Innovation. New York and Oxford: University Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1979): Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weingart, P. (1984): The structure of Technological Change: Reflections on a Sociological Analysis of Technology. In R. Laudan (ed.): The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 115–142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miettinen, R., Hasu, M. Articulating User Needs in Collaborative Design: Towards an Activity-Theoretical Approach. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 11, 129–151 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015256909032
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015256909032