Skip to main content
Log in

Using patent statistics as knowledge base indicators in the biotechnology sectors: An application to France, Germany and the U.K.

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to formulate firm, national or regional technology policy, it is necessary to have indicators that can measure technological competence. This paper develops a set of indicators using patent statistics to compare the “knowledge base” of individuals, laboratories, firms or nations. These indicators are then applied to the patent applications in France, Germany and the U.K. in the biotechnology sectors. The paper shows that France is lagging behind Germany and the U.K. in technology stocks (or its patent applications) in all biotechnology fields. However it is the leader in the technology network supporting the foods industry. It has a comparative advantage in terms of either technology stock counts or networks in Genetic Engineering, Pharmaceuticals, Foods, Chemicals, Cell Culture and Biocatalysis. Germany is leading in many sectors, but in all sectors in which it is a leader, it is a specialized leader, i.e. its technology networks need to be more extensive. It has a comparative advantage in terms of either technology stock counts or networks in all sectors except Genetic Engineering, Pharmaceuticals, Agriculture and Cell Culture. The U.K. is the leader in the important field of Genetic Engineering and in terms of the entire technology networks in the biotechnology sectors. It has a comparative advantage in terms of either technology stock counts or networks in Genetic Engineering, Pharmaceuticals, Agriculture and Purification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Mcallister P., Narin, F. (1991), Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents, Research Policy, 20: 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee P., Gupta, B. M., Garg, K. C. (2000), Patent statistics as indicators of competition an analysis of patenting in biotechnology, Scientometrics, 47: 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Law, J., Rip, A. (1986), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F., Woolf, P. (1981), Citation rates to technologically important patents, World Patent Information, 3,4: 160–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z. (1990), Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 27: 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly P.-B., de Looze M.-A. (1999), Copropriété de brevets et coopération en R&D: une analyse des biotechnologies, Economie Appliquée, 52: 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • LemariÉ S., de Looze M.-A., Mangematin, V. (2000), Strategies of European SMEs in biotechnology: the role of size, technology and market, Scientometrics, 47: 541–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed H. (Ed.) (1999), Selected Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Hinxton (Cambridge, U.K.), Scientometrics, 44 (3).

  • Mustar P. (1999), Les Chiffres Clés de la science et de la technologie, Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Olivastro P. (1988), Technology indicator based on patents and patent citations, In: A. F. J. Van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 465–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Noma E., Perry, R. (1987), Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength, Research Policy, 16: 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyons, E. C. M. (1999), Bibliometric Mapping as a Science Policy and Research Management Tool, Ph.D. Thesis. University of Leiden, The Netherlands. DSWO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques (2000), Science & Technologie Indicateurs, Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1988), Uses and abuses of patent statistics, In: A. F. J. Van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 509–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K., Patel, P. (1988), The international distribution of determinants of technological activities, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4: 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramani S. V., de Looze, M. A. (2000), A note on using patent statistics to obtain competition indicators, Scientometrics, 49: 547–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schankerman, M. (1991), Les statistiques sur les renouvellements de brevets: un moyen pour mesurer la valeur de la protection par brevet ainsi que la production de l'activité inventive, Science/Technologie/Industrie, Revue de l'OCDE, (April): 108–132.

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (Ed.) (1988), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P. (1999), The Citation Culture, Doctoral Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramani, S.V., de Looze, MA. Using patent statistics as knowledge base indicators in the biotechnology sectors: An application to France, Germany and the U.K.. Scientometrics 54, 319–346 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016026314914

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016026314914

Keywords

Navigation