Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling Connectionist Network Structures: Some Geometric and Categorical Aspects

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This contribution deals with an approach for mathematical modeling of the network structures of a certain connectionist network paradigm. Analysis of the structure of an artificial neural network (ANN) in that class of networks shows a possibility to introduce geometric and categorical modeling methods. This can be described briefly as follows. A (noncommutative) geometric space can be interpreted as a so-called geometric net. To a given ANN a corresponding geometric net can be associated. Geometric spaces form a category. Consequently, one obtains a category of geometric nets with a suitable notion of morphism. Then it is natural to interpret a learning step of an ANN as a morphism, thus learning corresponds to a finite sequence of morphisms (the associated networks are the objects). An associated (“local”) geometric net is less complex than the original ANN, but it contains all necessary information about the network structure. The association process together with learning (expressed by morphisms) leads to a commutative diagram corresponding to a suitable natural transformation, in terms of category theory. Commutativity of the diagram can be exploited to make learning “cheaper”. The simplified mathematical network model was used in ANN simulation applied in an industrial project on quality control. The “economy” of the model could be observed in a considerable increase of performance and decrease of production costs. Some prospects on the role of group operations that are induced by the regular structure of the underlying networks conclude the article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Adámek, H. Herrlich and G.E. Strecker, Abstract and Concrete Categories (Wiley, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. André, Endliche nichtkommutative Geometrie, Annales Univ. Saraviensis, Ser. Math. 2(1) (1988) 1-136.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. André, Configurational conditions and digraphs, Journal of Geometry 43 (1992) 22-29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. André, On non-commutative geometry, Annales Univ. Saraviensis, Ser. Math. 4(2) (1993) 93-129.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Eckmiller, Concerning the emerging role of geometry in neuroinformatics, in: Parallel Processing in Neural Systems and Computers, eds. R. Eckmiller, G. Hartmann and G. Hauske (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Geiger, Optical quality control with self-learning systems using a combination of algorithmic and neural network approaches, in: Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing, EUFIT'94, Aachen, September 20-23 (1994).

  7. H. Geiger and J. Pfalzgraf, Modeling a connectionist network paradigm: Geometric and categorical perspectives, in preparation.

  8. H. Geiger and J. Pfalzgraf, Quality control connectionist networks supported by a mathematical model, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Applications of Artificial Neural Networks (EANN'95), 21-23 August 1995, Helsinki, eds. A.B. Bulsari and S. Kallio (Finnish AI Society, 1995).

  9. S. Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 5, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  10. F.W. Lawvere and S.H. Schanuel, Conceptual Mathematics: A First Introduction to Categories (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Nauck, F. Klawonn and R. Kruse, Neuronale Netze und Fuzzy-Systeme (Vieweg Verlag, 1994).

  12. J. Pfalzgraf, On a model for non-commutative geometric spaces, Journal of Geometry 25 (1985) 147-163.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Pfalzgraf, On geometries associated with group operations, Geometriae Dedicata 21 (1986) 193-203.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Pfalzgraf, A note on simplices as geometric configurations, Archiv der Mathematik 49 (1987) 134-140.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Pfalzgraf, On a general notion of a hull, in: Automated Practical Reasoning, eds. J. Pfalzgraf and D. Wang, Texts and Monographs in Symbolic Computation (Springer, Wien, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Pfalzgraf, Graph products of groups and group spaces, Journal of Geometry 53 (1995) 131-147.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Pfalzgraf, On a category of geometric spaces and geometries induced by group actions, Ukrainian Journal of Physics 43(7) (1998) 847-856.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B.C. Pierce, Basic Category Theory for Computer Scientists (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Rojas, Theorie der neuronalen Netze, Springer-Lehrbuch (Springer, Berlin, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Sixt, Design of an artificial neural network simulator and its integration with a robot simulation environment, Diploma Thesis, RISC-Linz, University of Linz (1994).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfalzgraf, J. Modeling Connectionist Network Structures: Some Geometric and Categorical Aspects. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 36, 279–301 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016094912264

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016094912264

Keywords

Navigation