Skip to main content
Log in

Partially Well-Ordered Closed Sets of Permutations

  • Published:
Order Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is known that the “pattern containment” order on permutations is not a partial well-order. Nevertheless, many naturally defined subsets of permutations are partially well-ordered, in which case they have a strong finite basis property. Several classes are proved to be partially well-ordered under pattern containment. Conversely, a number of new antichains are exhibited that give some insight as to where the boundary between partially well-ordered and not partially well-ordered classes lies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson, M. D. (1999) Restricted permutations, Discrete Math. 195, 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson, M. D. and Stitt, T. Restricted permutations and the wreath product, In preparation.

  3. Atkinson, M. D. (1998) Permutations which are the union of an increasing and a decreasing sequence, Electron. J. Combin. 5, Paper R6.

  4. Atkinson, M. D. (1998) Generalised stack permutations, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 7, 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson, M. D. and Beals, R. Finiteness conditions on closed classes of permutations, unpublished.

  6. Bose, P., Buss, J. F. and Lubiw, A. (1998) Pattern matching for permutations, Inform. Process. Lett. 65, 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, D. I. A. (1978) Basic Techniques of Combinatorial Theory, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Higman, G. (1952) Ordering by divisibility in abstract algebras, Proc. London Math. Soc. 2, 326–336.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knuth, D. E. (1967) Fundamental Algorithms, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 1, 1st edn, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lakshmibai, V. and Sandhya, B. (1990) Criterion for smoothness of Schubert varieties, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 100, 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Murphy, M. M., Ph.D. Thesis, University of St Andrews, in preparation.

  12. Shapiro, L. and Stephens, A. B. (1991) Bootstrap percolation, the Schöder number, and the N-kings problem, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 2, 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pratt, V. R. (1973) Computing permutations with double-ended queues, parallel stacks and parallel queues, Proc. ACM Symp. Theory of Computing 5, 268–277.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Simion, R. and Schmidt, F. W. (1985) Restricted permutations, European J. Combin. 6, 383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spielman, D. A. and Bóna, M. (2000) An infinite antichain of permutations, Note N2, Electron. J. Combin. 7(1).

  16. Stankova, Z. E. (1994) Forbidden subsequences, Discrete Math. 132, 291–316.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stankova, Z. E. (1996) Classification of forbidden subsequences of length 4, European J. Combin. 17(5), 501–517.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tarjan, R. E. (1972) Sorting using networks of queues and stacks, J. ACM 19, 341–346.

    Google Scholar 

  19. West, J. (1996) Generating trees and forbidden sequences, Discrete Math. 157, 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atkinson, M.D., Murphy, M.M. & Ruškuc, N. Partially Well-Ordered Closed Sets of Permutations. Order 19, 101–113 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016500300436

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016500300436

Navigation