Skip to main content
Log in

An Interior-Point Method for Approximate Positive Semidefinite Completions

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given a nonnegative, symmetric matrix of weights, H, we study the problem of finding an Hermitian, positive semidefinite matrix which is closest to a given Hermitian matrix, A, with respect to the weighting H. This extends the notion of exact matrix completion problems in that, H ij =0 corresponds to the element A ij being unspecified (free), while H ij large in absolute value corresponds to the element A ij being approximately specified (fixed).

We present optimality conditions, duality theory, and two primal-dual interior-point algorithms. Because of sparsity considerations, the dual-step-first algorithm is more efficient for a large number of free elements, while the primal-step-first algorithm is more efficient for a large number of fixed elements.

Included are numerical tests that illustrate the efficiency and robustness of the algorithms

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Alizadeh, J.-P.A. Haeberly, and M.L. Overton, “Primal-dual interior-point methods for semidefinite programming: convergence rates, stability and numerical results,” Technical Report, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 1996, NYU Computer Science Dept. Technical Report 721.

  2. W.W. Barrett, C.R. Johnson, and R. Loewy, “The real positive definite completion problem: cycle completability,” Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, p. 71, 1996.

  3. J.M. Borwein and H. Wolkowicz, “A simple constraint qualification in infinite dimensional programming,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 35, pp. 83-96, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.M. Borwein and A. Lewis, “Partially finite convex programming, Part I, duality theory,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 57, pp. 15-48, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, “Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory,” Studies in Applied Mathematics, SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, vol. 15, June 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Dym and I. Gohberg, “Extensions of band matrices with band inverses,” Linear Algebra and Its Applications, vol. 36, pp. 1-24, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Glunt, T. Hayden, C.R. Johnson, and P. Tarazaga, “Maximum determinant completions,” Technical Report, Dept. of Mathematics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Grone, C. Johnson, E. Marques De Sa, and H. Wolkowicz, “Positive definite completions of partial Hermitian matrices,” Linear Algebra and Its Applications, vol. 58, pp. 109-124, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Helmberg, F. Rendl, R.J. Vanderbei, and H. Wolkowicz, “An interior point method for semidefinite programming,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, pp. 342-361, 1996. URL: ftp://orion.uwaterloo.ca/pub/henry/reports/sdp.ps.gz.

  10. R.A. Horn and C.R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press: New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.R. Johnson and B. Kroschel, “Principal submatrices, geometric multiplicities, and structured eigenvectors,” SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol. 16, pp. 1004-1012, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.R. Johnson and P. Tarazaga, “Approximate semidefinite matrices in a subspace,” Technical Report, Dept. of Mathematics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, 1995, to appear in SIMAX.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Kojima, M. Shida, and S. Shindoh, “Reduction of monotone linear complementarity problems over cones to linear programs over cones,” Technical Report, Dept. of Information Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Kojima, S. Shindoh, and S. Hara, “Interior-point methods for the monotone semidefinite linear complementarity problem in symmetric matrices,” SIAM J. Optim., vol. 7, no.1, pp. 86-125, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Kruk, M. Muramatsu, F. Rendl, R.J. Vanderbei, and H. Wolkowicz, “The Gauss-Newton direction in linear and semidefinite programming,” Technical Report in progress, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.G. Luenberger, Optimization by Vector Space Methods, John Wiley, 1969.

  17. J.R. Magnus and H. Neudecker, Matrix Differential Calculus, Wiley: New York, NY, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C.A. Micchelli, P.W. Smith, J. Swetits, and J.D.Ward, “Constrained l p approximation,” Journal of Constructive Approximation, vol. 1, pp. 93-102, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Mizuno, M.J. Todd, and Y. Ye, “On adaptive-step primal-dual interior-point algorithms for linear programming,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 18, no.4, pp. 964-981, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.J. Moreau, “Décomposition orthogonale d'un espace hilbertien selon deux co{ie190-01}es mutuellement polaires,” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 255, pp. 238-240, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Y.E. Nesterov and A.S. Nemirovsky, Interior Point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming: Theory and Algorithms, SIAM Publications: SIAM, Philadelphia, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.L. Overton, “Large-scale optimization of eigenvalues,” SIAM J. Optimization, vol. 2, pp. 88-120, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P.W. Smith and H. Wolkowicz, “A nonlinear equation for linear programming,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 34, pp. 235-238, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, C.R., Kroschel, B. & Wolkowicz, H. An Interior-Point Method for Approximate Positive Semidefinite Completions. Computational Optimization and Applications 9, 175–190 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018363021404

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018363021404

Navigation