Skip to main content
Log in

A boundary-sensitive approach to qualitative location

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reasoning about the location of regions in 2-dimensional space is necessarily based on finite approximations to such regions. These finite approximations are often derived by describing how a region (the figure) relates to a frame of reference (the ground). The frame of reference generally consists of regions, or cells, forming a partition of the space under consideration. This paper presents a new approach to describing figure-ground relationships which is able to take account of how the figure relates to boundaries between cells as well as to their interiors. We also provide a general theory of how approximations to regions lead to approximations to operations on regions. This theory is applied to the case of our boundary-sensitive model of location. The paper concludes by indicating how interpreting boundaries in a more general sense should lead to a theory dealing with generalized partitions in which the cells may overlap. The applications of the theory developed here will include qualitative spatial reasoning, and should have practical relevance to geographical information systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Bittner, A qualitative coordinate language of location of figures within the ground, in: Proceedings of International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT' 97, eds. S.C. Hirtle and A.U. Frank, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1329 (Springer, New York, 1997) pp. 223–240.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Borceux, Handbook of Categorical Algebra, Vol. 1: Basic Category Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.A. Burrough and A.U. Frank, eds., Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, GISDATA Series, Vol. 2 (Taylor and Francis, 1996).

  4. B.L. Clarke, A calculus of individuals based on 'connection', Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 22 (1981) 204–218.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. B.L. Clarke, Individuals and points, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 26 (1985) 61–75.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Clementini and P. Di Felice, An algebraic model for spatial objects with indeterminate boundaries, in: Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, GISDATA Series, Vol. 2 (Taylor and Francis, 1996) pp. 155–169.

  7. E. Clementini and P. Di Felice, Approximate topological relations, Internat. J. Approximate Reasoning 16 (1997) 173–204.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. A.G. Cohn, Calculi for qualitative spatial reasoning, in: Artificial Intelligence and Symbolic Mathematical Computation, eds. J. Calmet, J.A. Campbell and J. Pfalzgraf, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1138 (Springer, New York, 1996) pp. 124–143.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.G. Cohn and N.M. Gotts, The 'egg-yolk' representation of regions with indeterminate boundaries, in: Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, GISDATA Series, Vol. 2 (Taylor and Francis, 1996) pp. 171–187.

  10. M.J. Egenhofer and R. Franzosa, Point-set topological spatial relations, Internat. J. Geographical Information Systems 5 (1991) 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M.J. Egenhofer and R. Franzosa, On the equivalence of topological relations, Internat. J. Geographical Information Systems 9 (1995) 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Erwig and M. Schneider, Partition and conquer, in: Proceedings of International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT' 97, eds. S.C. Hirtle and A.U. Frank, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1329 (Springer, New York, 1997) pp. 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Galton, Modes of overlap, J. Visual Languages Comput. 9 (1998) 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N.M. Gotts, J.M. Gooday and A.G. Cohn, A connection based approach to common-sense topological description and reasoning, The Monist 79 (1996) 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.C. Hirtle and A.U. Frank, eds., Proceedings of International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT' 97, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1329 (Springer, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Lundell, A qualitative model of physical fields, in: Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI' 96 (AAAI Press, 1996) pp. 1016–1021.

  17. E. Or?owska, ed., Incomplete Information – Rough Set Analysis, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 13 (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1997).

  18. M.B. Smyth, Topology, in: Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, Vol. 1 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992) pp. 641–761.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.G. Stell and M.F. Worboys, The algebraic structure of sets of regions, in: Proceedings of International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT' 97, eds, S.C. Hirtle and A.U. Frank, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1329 (Springer, New York, 1997) pp. 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.G. Stell and M.F. Worboys, Stratified map spaces: A formal basis for multi-resolution spatial databases, in: Proceedings 8th of International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, SDH' 98, eds. T. K. Poiker and N. Chrisman (International Geographical Union, 1998) pp. 180–189.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bittner, T., Stell, J.G. A boundary-sensitive approach to qualitative location. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 24, 93–114 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018945131135

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018945131135

Keywords

Navigation