Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On multiple spline approximations for Bayesian computations

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Probabilistic reasoning typically suffers from the explosive amount of information it must maintain. There are a variety of methods available for curbing this explosion. However, in doing so, it is important to avoid oversimplifying the given domain through injudicious use of assumptions such as independence. Multiple splining is an approach for compressing and approximating the probabilistic information. Instead of positing additional independence conditions, it attempts to identify patterns in the information. While the data explosion is multiplicative in nature, O(n 1 n 2n k), multiple splines reduces it to an additive one, O(n 1 + n 2 + ⋯n k). We consider how these splines can be found and used. Since splines exploit patterns in the data, we can also use them to help in filling in missing data. As it turns out, our splining method is quite general and may be applied to other domains besides probabilistic reasoning which can benefit from data compression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. G.F. Cooper, Probabilistic inference using belief networks is NP-hard, Technical Report KSL-87-27, Medical Computer Science Group, Stanford University (1987).

  2. P. Dagum and M. Luby, Approximating probabilistic inference in Bayesian belief networks is NP-hard, Artificial Intelligence 60(1) (1993) 141–153.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Geman and D. Geman, Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distribution, and the bayesian restoration of images, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6 (1984) 721–741.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Heckerman, Probabilistic Similarity Networks (MIT Press, 1991).

  5. J. Kirman, A. Nicholson, M. Lejter, E. Santos, Jr. and T. Dean, Using goals to find plans with high expected utility, in: Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Planning (1993).

  6. J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Peng and J.A. Reggia, Plausibility of diagnostic hypothese: The nature of simplicity, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference (1986) pp. 140–147.

  8. E. Santos, Jr., On spline approximations for baycsian computations, Technical Report CS-92-47, Department of Computer Science, Brown University (1992).

  9. E. Santos, Jr., Efficient jumpstarting of hill-climbing search for the most probable explanation, in: Proceedings of International Congress on Computer Systems and Applied Mathematics Workshop on Constraint Processing (1993) pp. 183–194.

  10. E. Santos, Jr., A fast hill-climbing approach without an energy function for finding mpe, in: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (1993).

  11. E. Santos, Jr., A linear constraint satisfaction approach to cost-based abduction, Artificial Intelligence 65(1) (1994) 1–28.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Santos, Jr. and S.E. Shimony, Belief updating by enumerating high-probability independence-based assignments, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1994) pp. 506–513.

  13. R.D. Shachter, Evaluating influence diagrams, Operations Research 36 (1986) 871–882.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. S.E. Shimony, The role of relevance in explanation, I: Irrelevance as statistical independence, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (June 1993).

  15. S.E. Shimony, Finding MAPs for belief networks is NP-hard, Artificial Intelligence 68 (1994) 399–410.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. S.E. Shimony, The role of relevance in explanation, II: Disjunctive assignments and approximate independence, to appear in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning.

  17. S. Srinivas, A generalization of the noisy-OR model, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1993) pp. 208–215.

  18. B.K. Sy, Reasoning mpe to multiply connected belief networks using message passing, in: Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1992).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santos, E. On multiple spline approximations for Bayesian computations. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 20, 267–300 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018984528467

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018984528467

Keywords