Abstract
Probabilistic reasoning typically suffers from the explosive amount of information it must maintain. There are a variety of methods available for curbing this explosion. However, in doing so, it is important to avoid oversimplifying the given domain through injudicious use of assumptions such as independence. Multiple splining is an approach for compressing and approximating the probabilistic information. Instead of positing additional independence conditions, it attempts to identify patterns in the information. While the data explosion is multiplicative in nature, O(n 1 n 2⋯n k), multiple splines reduces it to an additive one, O(n 1 + n 2 + ⋯n k). We consider how these splines can be found and used. Since splines exploit patterns in the data, we can also use them to help in filling in missing data. As it turns out, our splining method is quite general and may be applied to other domains besides probabilistic reasoning which can benefit from data compression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
G.F. Cooper, Probabilistic inference using belief networks is NP-hard, Technical Report KSL-87-27, Medical Computer Science Group, Stanford University (1987).
P. Dagum and M. Luby, Approximating probabilistic inference in Bayesian belief networks is NP-hard, Artificial Intelligence 60(1) (1993) 141–153.
S. Geman and D. Geman, Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distribution, and the bayesian restoration of images, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6 (1984) 721–741.
D. Heckerman, Probabilistic Similarity Networks (MIT Press, 1991).
J. Kirman, A. Nicholson, M. Lejter, E. Santos, Jr. and T. Dean, Using goals to find plans with high expected utility, in: Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Planning (1993).
J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1988).
Y. Peng and J.A. Reggia, Plausibility of diagnostic hypothese: The nature of simplicity, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference (1986) pp. 140–147.
E. Santos, Jr., On spline approximations for baycsian computations, Technical Report CS-92-47, Department of Computer Science, Brown University (1992).
E. Santos, Jr., Efficient jumpstarting of hill-climbing search for the most probable explanation, in: Proceedings of International Congress on Computer Systems and Applied Mathematics Workshop on Constraint Processing (1993) pp. 183–194.
E. Santos, Jr., A fast hill-climbing approach without an energy function for finding mpe, in: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (1993).
E. Santos, Jr., A linear constraint satisfaction approach to cost-based abduction, Artificial Intelligence 65(1) (1994) 1–28.
E. Santos, Jr. and S.E. Shimony, Belief updating by enumerating high-probability independence-based assignments, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1994) pp. 506–513.
R.D. Shachter, Evaluating influence diagrams, Operations Research 36 (1986) 871–882.
S.E. Shimony, The role of relevance in explanation, I: Irrelevance as statistical independence, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (June 1993).
S.E. Shimony, Finding MAPs for belief networks is NP-hard, Artificial Intelligence 68 (1994) 399–410.
S.E. Shimony, The role of relevance in explanation, II: Disjunctive assignments and approximate independence, to appear in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning.
S. Srinivas, A generalization of the noisy-OR model, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1993) pp. 208–215.
B.K. Sy, Reasoning mpe to multiply connected belief networks using message passing, in: Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santos, E. On multiple spline approximations for Bayesian computations. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 20, 267–300 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018984528467
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018984528467