Skip to main content
Log in

Performance, interdependence and coordination in business‐to‐business electronic commerce and supply chain management

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After discovering the inadequacy of traditional relationships across the value‐chain, many organizations today are establishing new forms of interorganizational systems with their suppliers and customers in an effort to improve total channel performance. Electronic commerce linkages are being created between independent organizations in multiple industries, including manufacturing, financial services, transportation, and retailing. Efforts to improve channel efficiency using business‐to‐business electronic commerce systems generally require increased interdependence and expanded coordination between independent firms to capture the potential benefits enabled by tighter interorganizational integration of operations. Participating firms can gain dramatic benefits from establishing electronic linkage only when the system is used to increase interdependence and to expand coordination between firms involved in the new interorganizational relationship. Drawing on theoretical and empirical research on electronic communications and inter‐firm designs, we develop and test a model for the relationship between performance, interdependence and coordination of firms involved in interorganizational relations within the US grocery channel. The research design includes qualitative case study analysis and quantitative survey data analysis to validate the key case study findings. Both qualitative and quantitative findings indicate that channel performance, interdependence, and coordination are closely related for firms in interorganizational relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P.S. Adler, Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: the case of the design/manufacturing interface, Organization Science 6(2) (1995) 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. Benbasat, D.K. Goldstein and M. Mead, The case research strategy in studies of information systems, MIS Quarterly 11(3) (1987) 369–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D.T. Campbell and J.C. Stanley, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.H. Clark, Linking the grocery channel: technological innovation, organizational transformation, and channel performance, Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T.H. Clark, D.C. Croson, J.L. McKenney and R.L. Nolan, H.E. Butt Grocery Company: A leader in ECR implementation, HBS Case #9-195-125, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.H. Clark and J.L. McKenney, Campbell Soup Company: A leader in continuous replenishment innovations, HBS Case #9-195-124, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T.H. Clark and J.L. McKenney, Procter & Gamble: Improving consumer value through process redesign, HBS Case #9-195-126, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.H. Clark and D.B. Stoddard, Interorganizational business process redesign: merging technological and process innovation, Journal of Management Information Systems 13(2) (1996) 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.K. Clemons and M.C. Row, Information technology and industrial cooperation: the changing economics of coordination and ownership, Journal of Management Information Systems 9(2) (1992) 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.E. Ettlie and H.W. Stoll, Managing the Design-Manufacturing Process (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Fulk and G. DeSanctis, Electronic communication and changing organizational forms, Organization Science 6(4) (1995) 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Galbraith, Organization Design (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Gurbaxani and S. Whang, The impacts of information systems on organizations and markets, Communications of the ACM 34(1) (1991) 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C.L. Iacovou, I. Benbasat and A.S. Dexter, Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology, MIS Quarterly 19(4) (1995) 465–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurt Salmon Associates, Inc., Efficient Consumer Response: Enhancing Consumer Value in the Grocery Industry (Food Marketing Institute, Washington, DC, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Lawrence and J. Lorsch, Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H.G. Lee and T.H. Clark, Market process reengineering through electronic market systems: opportunities and challenges, Journal of Management Information Systems 13(3) (1996) 113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H.C. Lucas Jr. and J. Baroudi, The role of information technology in organization design, Journal of Management Information Systems 10(4) (1994) 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. Malone, J. Yates and R. Benjamin, Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies, Communication of the ACM 30(6) (1987) 484–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C.L. Marshall, B. Konsynski and J. Sviokla, Baxter International: OnCall as soon as possible?, HBS Case #9-195-103, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Mintzberg, The Restructuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research (Prentice-Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Mukhopadhyay, S. Kekre and S. Kalathur, Business value of information technology: a study of electronic data interchange, MIS Quarterly 19(2) (1995) 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. N. Norhia and R.G. Eccles, Face-to-face: making network organizations work, in: Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, eds. N. Nohria, R.G. Eccles, H. Ibarra, J.L. McKenney and R.M. Kanter (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Pfeffer and G.R. Salansik, The External Control of Organizations (Harper and Row, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J.M. Pickering and J.L. King, Hardwiring weak ties: interorganizational computer-mediated communication, occupational communities and organizational change, Organization Science 6(4) (1995) 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Progressive Grocer Marketing Guidebook (Trade Dimensions, Stamford, CT, 1993).

  27. T. Reve, The firm as a nexus of internal and external contracts, in: The Firm as a Nexus of Treaties, eds. M. Aoki, B. Gustafson and O.E. Williamson (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  28. P.S. Ring and A.H. Van de Ven, Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships, Academy of Management Review 19(1) (1994) 90–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. W. Schiano, T.H. Clark and J.L. McKenney, Hannaford Brothers: Leading the grocery channel transformation, HBS Case #N9-195-127, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. Srinivasan, S. Kekre and T. Mukhopadhyay, Impact of electronic data interchange technology on JIT shipments, Management Science 40(10) (1994) 1291–1304.

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. Stalk, P. Evans and L. Shulman, Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy, Harvard Business Review 70(2) (1992) 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  32. D.J. Teece, Competition, cooperation and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 18(1) (1992) 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J.D. Thompson, Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. Tushman and G. Nadler, Information processing as an integrative concept in organizational design, Academy of Management Review 1 (1978) 613–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. O.E. Williamson, Markets and Hierarchies (The Free Press, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  36. O.E. Williamson, Transaction cost economics: the governance of contractual relations, Journal of Law and Economics 22(2) (1979) 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. O.E. Williamson, The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach, American Journal of Sociology 87(3) (1981) 548–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. O.E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (The Free Press, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  39. R.K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  40. A. Zaheer and N. Venkatraman, Determinants of electronic integration in the insurance industry: an empirical test, Management Science 40(5) (1994) 549–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, T.H., Lee, H.G. Performance, interdependence and coordination in business‐to‐business electronic commerce and supply chain management. Information Technology and Management 1, 85–105 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019108621684

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019108621684

Navigation