Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the CMM Level 3 KPA of Intergroup Coordination: A theory-based approach

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the Intergroup Coordination key process area (KPA) for theoretical significance and measurability. The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) has developed a framework called the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) which enables organizations to measure their “maturity” in doing software engineering. The CMM is not theoretically derived. It is, however, a result of years of anecdotal evidence collected from practitioners. This paper compares the Intergroup Coordination KPA to the body of literature on coordination and measures it using theoretically derived determinants. These determinants are then evaluated for possible relationships to productivity factors that indicate business process support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.S. Humphrey, Managing the Software Process (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.C. Paulk, C.V. Weber, B. Curtis and M.B. Chrissis, The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Bollinger and C. McGowan, A critical look at software capability evaluations, IEEE Software 8(4) (July 1991) 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Jones, Artificial maturity levels, in: Assessment and Control of Software Risks (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994) pp. 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Saiedian and R. Kuzara, SEI capability maturity model's impact on contractors, IEEE Computer 28(1) (January 1995) 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Bach, Enough about process: What we need are heroes, IEEE Software 12(2) (February 1995) 96–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Sanders and E. Curran, Software Quality: A Framework for Success in Software Development and Support (Addison-Wesley 1994).

  8. B.S. Georgopoulos and F.C. Mann, Coordination, The Community General Hospital (Macmillan, New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.H. Haeckel and R.L. Nolan, Managing by wire, Harvard Business Review 71(5) (September-October 1993) 122–133.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T.W. Malone and K. Crowston, Toward an interdisciplinary theory of coordination, CCS TR #120, SS WP #3294-91-MSA (1991).

  11. J. Lipnack and J. Stamps, Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology (Wiley, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. DeSanctis and B.M. Jackson, Coordination of information technology management: Teambased structures and computer-based communication systems, Journal of Management Information Systems 10(4) (1994).

  13. R.E. Kraut and L.A. Streeter, Coordination in software development, Communications of the ACM 38(3) (1995).

  14. I. Gorton, and S. Motwani, Issues in co-operative software engineering using globally distributed teams, Information and Software Technology 38 (1996).

  15. K.M. Nelson and J.G. Cooprider, The contribution of shared knowledge to I/S group performance, MIS Quarterly 20(4) (December 1996).

  16. L.J. Kirsch, The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process, Organization Science 7(9) (1996).

  17. C. Alter, An exploratory study of conflict and coordination in interorganizational service delivery systems, Academy of Management Journal 33(3) (1990).

  18. J.C. Anderson and J.A. Narus, A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships, Journal of Marketing 54(1) (January 1990) 42–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R.M. Kanter, The Change Masters (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S.R. Nidumolu, A comparison of the structural contingency and risk-based perspectives on coordination in software-development projects, Journal of Management Information Systems 13(2) (1996).

  21. I. Sommerville, Software Engineering (Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Topper, D. Ouellete and P. Jorgensen, Structured Methods: Merging Models, Techniques and CASE (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.D. Banker, S. Datar and C. Kemerer, A model to evaluate variables impacting the productivity of software maintenance projects, Management Science 37(1) (January 1991).

  24. K. Crowston, A coordination theory approach to organizational process design, Organization Science 8(2) (1997).

  25. S. Rathnam, V. Mahajan and A.B. Whinston, Facilitating coordination in customer support teams: A framework and its implications for the design of information technology, Management Science 41(12) (1995).

  26. G.V. Glass and K.D. Hopkins, Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology (Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, K.M., Armstrong, D., Buche, M. et al. Evaluating the CMM Level 3 KPA of Intergroup Coordination: A theory-based approach. Information Technology and Management 1, 171–181 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019168807572

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019168807572

Navigation