Abstract
Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite networks are foreseen to complement terrestrial networks in future global mobile networks. Although space segment topology of a LEO network is characterized by periodic variations, connections of mobile stations (MSs) to the satellite backbone network alter stochastically. As a result the quality of service delivered to users may degrade. Different procedures have been proposed either as part of a resource allocation mechanism or as part of an end-to-end routing protocol to manage transitions of MSs from one satellite to another (handover). All of these techniques are based on the prioritization of requested handovers to ease network operation and therefore enhance provision of service. This paper proposes a new handover procedure that exploits all geometric characteristics of a satellite-to-MS connection to provide an equable handover in systems incorporating onboard processing satellites. Its performance is evaluated by simulations for a variety of satellite constellations to prove its general applicability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Maral and M. Bousquet, Satellite Communications Systems, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 2nd edn, 1993.
E. del Re, R. Fantacci and G. Giambene, “Efficient Dynamic Channel Allocation Techniques with Handover Queuing for Mobile Satellite Networks”, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 397–405, 1995.
E. del Re, R. Fantacci and G. Giambene, “A Measurement Prioritization Scheme for Handovers in Mobile Cellular Networks”, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 1343–1350, 1992.
D. Hong and S.S. Rappaport, “TrafficModel and Performance Analysis for Cellular Mobile Radio Telephone Systems with Prioritized Handoff Procedures”, IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 77–92, 1986.
S. Tekinay and B. Jabbari, “Handover and Channel Assignment in Mobile Cellular Networks”, IEEE Commun. Mag., Vol. 29, No. 11, pp. 42–46, 1991.
G. Maral, J. Restrepo, E. del Re, R. Fantacci and G. Giambene, “Performance Analysis for a Guaranteed Handover Service in an LEO Constellation with Satellite-Fixed Cell”, IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 1200–1214, 1998.
O. Ercetin, S. Krishnamurthy, S. Dao and L. Tassiulas, “A Predictive QoS Routing Scheme for Broadband Low Earth Orbit Satellite Networks”, in Proc. PIMRC 2000, London U.K.
Irfan Ali, Naofal Al-Dhahir and John E. Hershey, “Doppler Characterization for LEO Satellites”, IEEE Trans. on Communications, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 309–313, 1998.
E. Papapetrou and F.-N. Pavlidou, “A Proposal of Optimal Routing Techniques for non-GEO Satellite Systems”, Int. J. Wireless Information Networks, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2001.
M. Werner, C. Delucchi, H.J. Vogel, G. Maral and J.J. De Ridder, “ATM-Based Routing in LEO-MEO Satellite Networks with Intersatellite Links”, IEEE Journal on Selected areas in Communications, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 69–82, 1996.
I. Gragopoulos, E. Papappetrou and F.-N. Pavlidou, “Performance Study of Adaptive Routing Algorithms for LEO Satellite Constellations under Self-Similar and Poisson Traffic”, Space Communications, Vol. 16, pp. 15–22, 2000.
H.S. Chang et al., “Performance Comparison of Static Routing and Dynamic Routing in Low Earth Orbit Satellite Networks”, in Proc. of VTC'96, pp. 1240–1243, 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Papapetrou, E., Pavlidou, FN. QoS Handover Management in LEO/MEO Satellite Systems. Wireless Personal Communications 24, 189–204 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022569901936
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022569901936