Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we describe the novel concept of performance-based progressive robot therapy that uses speed, time, or EMG thresholds to initiate robot assistance. We pioneered the clinical application of robot-assisted therapy focusing on stroke—the largest cause of disability in the US. We have completed several clinical studies involving well over 200 stroke patients. Research to date has shown that repetitive task-specific, goal-directed, robot-assisted therapy is effective in reducing motor impairments in the affected arm after stroke. One research goal is to determine the optimal therapy tailored to each stroke patient that will maximize his/her recovery. A proposed method to achieve this goal is a novel performance-based impedance control algorithm, which is triggered via speed, time, or EMG. While it is too early to determine the effectiveness of the algorithm, therapists have already noted one very strong benefit, a significant reduction in arm tone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Aisen, M.L., Krebs, H.I., McDowell, F., Hogan, N., and Volpe, B.T. 1997. The effect of robot assisted therapy & rehabilitative training on motor recovery following a stroke. Archives of Neurology, 54:443–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizawa, H., Inase, M., Mushiake, H., Shima, K., and Tanji, J. 1994. Reorganization of supplementary motor areas after neocortical damage. Exp. Br. Res., 84:668–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akazawa, K., Milner, T.E., and Stein, R.B. 1983. Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle. J. of Neurophysiology, 49:16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma, C. 1991. Mapping movements within a moving motor map. Trends in Neuroscience, 14:217–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainin, M., Bornstein, N., Boysen, G., and Demarin, V. 2000. Acute neurological stroke care in Europe: Results of the European stroke care inventory. European Journal of Neurology, 7:5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buerger, S.P., Krebs, H.I., and Hogan, N. 2001. Characterization and control of a screw-driven robot for neurorehabilitation. IEEE—CCA/ISIC 2001.

  • Celestino, J., Krebs, H.I., and Hogan, N. in press. A robot for wrist rehabilitation: Characterization and initial results. ICORR-2003.

  • Classen, J., Liepert, J., Wise, S.P., Hallet, M., and Cohen, L.G. 1998. Rapid plasticity of human cortical representation induced by practice. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79(2):1117–1123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozens, J.A. 1999. Robotic assistance of an active upper limb exercise in neurologically impaired patients. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 7(2).

  • Dewald, J.P.A., Pope, P.S., Given, J., Buchanan, T.S., and Rymer, W.Z. 1995. Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. Brain, 118(2):495–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M.C., Greer, E.R., York, A., Lewis, D., Barton, T., and Lin, J. 1987. Rat cortical morphology following crowded enriched living conditions. Exp. Neurol, 87(2):309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M.C., Ingham, C.A., Johnson, R.E., Bennet, E.L., and Rozenzweig, M.R. 1976. Effects of environment on morphology of rat cerebral cortex and hippocampus. J. Neurobiol, 7(1):75–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M.C., Johnson, R.E., Protti, A.M., Ott, C., and Kajisa, L. 1985. Plasticity in the 904-day-old male rat cerebral cortex. Exp. Neurol, 87(2):309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M.C., Law, F., Rhodes, H., Lindner, B., Rosenzweig, M.R., Krech, D., and Bennet, E.L. 1966. Increases in cortical depth and glia numbers in rats subjected to enriched environment. J. Comp Neurol, 128(1):117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, M., Demaio, J.H., Krol, J., Trudell, C., Edelstein, L., Christos, P., England, J., Fasoli, S., Aisen, M.L., Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., and Volpe, B.T. 2002. Assessing the motor status score: Ascale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 16(3):301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasoli, S.E., Krebs, H.I., Stein, J., Frontera, W.R., and Hogan, N. 2003. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch. Physical Medicine, 84:477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C.M. 1992. Concerning the mechanism of recovery in stroke hemiplegia. Can. J. Neurol. Sci., 19:57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda, O., Tsuji, T., and Kaneko, M. 1997. An EMG controlled manipulator using ANNs. IEEE InternationalWorkshop on Robot and Human Communication.

  • Fukuda, O., Tsuji, T., Ohtsuka, A., and Kaneko, M. 1998. EMG-based human-robot interface for rehabilitation aid. In Proc. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium.

  • Fukuda, O., Tsuji, T., Kane KO, M., Otsuka, A. 2003. A human-assisting manipulator teleperated by EMG signals and arm motions. IEEE Robotics and Automation, 19(2):210–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glees, P. 1980. Functional reorganization following hemispherectomy in man and after small experimental lesions in primates. In Recovery of Function: Theoretical Considerations for Brain Injury Rehabilitation, Bach-y-Rita P. (Ed.), Baltimore, University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graupe, D., Kohn, K.H., Kralj, A., and Basseas, S. 1983. Patient controlled electrical stimulation via EMG signature discrimination for providing certain paraplegics with primitive walking functions. J. Biomed. Eng., 5:220–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, E.R., Diamond, M.C., and Murphy, G.M. Jr. 1982. Increased branching of basal dendrites on pyramidal neurons in the occipital cortex of homozygous Brattleboro rats in standard and enriched environmental conditions: A Golgi study. Exp Neurol, 76(2):254–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, G.E., Duncan, P.W., Stason W.B. et al. 1995. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. Clinical Practice Guideline, No. 16. U.S. Dept. Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR Publication No. 95-0662.

  • Hogan, N., Krebs, H.I., Sharon, A., and Charnnarong, J. 1995. Interactive robotic therapist. US Patent No. 5,466,213.

  • Hogan, N. 1976. A review of the methods of processing EMG for use as a proportional control signal. Biomed. Eng., 11:81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, N. 1985. Impedance control: An approach to manipulation. ASME-Journal Dyn Syst Measure Control, 107:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, K.M. and Konoghue, J.P. 1991. Reshaping the cortical motor map by unmasking latent intracortical connections. Science, 251:944–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, W.M. and Merzenich, M.M. 1987. Reorganization of neocortical representations after brain injury. Progress in Brain Research, 71:249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.A. and Shallert, T. 1994. Used dependent growth after neocortical damage. J. Neuroscience, 14:2140–2152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jugenheimer, K.A., Hogan, N., and Krebs, H.I. 2001. A robot for hand rehabilitation: A continuation of the MIT-MANUS neurorehabilitation workstation. ASME 2001 IDETC/CIE.

  • Kaas, J.H., Krubitzer, L.A., Chino, Y.M. et al. 1990. Reorganization of retinotopic cortical maps in adult mammals after lesions of the retina. Science, 248:229–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, I., Okazaki, E., Kikuchi, H., and Iwanami, K. 1967. Electropneumatically controlled hand prosthesis using pattern recognition of mio-electric signals. In Proc. 7th ICMBE.

  • Kazerooni, H. 1990. Human-robot interaction via the transfer of power and information signals. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20(2):450–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, R.E. and Mirbagheri, M.M. 2001. Identification and simulation as tools for measurement of neuromuscular properties. IEEE—23rd EMBS.

  • King, A.J. and Moore, D.R. 1991. Plasticity of auditory maps in the brain. Trends in Neuroscience, 14:21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Aisen, M.L., and Volpe, B.T. 1998. Robotaided neuro-rehabilitation. IEEE-Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 6(1):75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Aisen, M.L., and Volpe, B.T. 1999. Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury. Proc. National. Academy of Science, 96:4645–4649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Hening, W., Adamovich, S., and Poizner, H. 2001. Procedural motor learning in parkinson's disease. Exp. Brain Res., 141:425–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Aisen, M.L., and Hogan, N. 2000. Increasing productivity and quality of care: Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. VA Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6):639–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Ferraro, M., Fasoli, S., Palazzolo, J., Rohrer, B., Edelstein, L., and Hogan, N. 2002. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: From evidence-based to science-based rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 8(4):54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Palazzolo, J.J., Fasoli, S.E., Ferraro, M., Edelstein, L., and Hogan, N. 2001. Disturbances of higher level neural control—Robotic applications in stroke. IEEE—23rd EMBS, Istanbul, Turkey.

  • Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Palazzolo, J., Rohrer, B., Ferraro, M., Fasoli, S., Edelstein, L., and Hogan, N. 2001. Robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation in stroke: Interim results on the follow-up of 76 patients and on movement performance indices. In Integration of Assistive Technology in the Information Age, Mounir Mokhtari (Ed.), IOS Press, Assistive Technology Research Series, Amsterdam, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lum, P.S., Burgar, C.G., Shor, P., Majmundar, M., and Van der Loos, M. 2000. Robot-assisted movement training compared with convention therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upperpinto motor junc after stroke arch. Phys. Med. Rehab., 83:952–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical Research Council/Guarantors of Brain. 1986. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. London, Bailliere Tindall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich, M.M., Jenkins, W.M., Johnston, P., Schreiner, C., Miller, S.L., and Tallal, P. 1996. Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science, 271:77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich, M.M., Nelson, R.J., Stryker, M.P., Cynader, M.S., Schoppmann, A., and Zook, J.M. 1984. Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J Comparative Neurology, 224:591–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirbagheri, M.M., Barbeau, H., Ladouceur, M., and Kearney, R.E. 2001. Intrinsic and reflex stiffness in normal and spastic, spinal cord injured subjects. Exp Brain Res, 141:446–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A., Hogan, N., and Bizzi, E. 1985. Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 5(10):2732–2743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nudo, R.J., Wise, B.M., SiFuentes, F., and Milliken, G.W. 1996. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science, 272:1791–1794.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg-Hansen, R. and Rinvik, E. 1963. Some comments on the pyramidal tract, with special reference to its individual variations in man. Acta Neurol. Scand., 39:1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. and Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A. 2001. Robotic teaching by exploiting the nervous system's adaptive mechanisms. In Integration of Assistive Technology in the Information Age, Mounir Mokhtari (Ed.), IOS Press, Assistive Technology Research Series, Amsterdam, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckham, P.H., Marsolais, E.B., and Mortimer, J.T. 1980. Restoration of key grip and release in C6 tetraplegic patient through functional electrical stimulation. J. Hand Surg., 5(5):462–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipson, L. 1985. Adaptable myoelectric prosthetic control with functional visual feedback using microprocessor techniques. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 23:8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons, T.P., Garraghty, P.E., and Mishkin, M. 1988. Lesion-induced plasticity in the second somatosensory cortex of adult macaques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 85:5279–5281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinkensmeyer, D., Schmit, B.D., and Rymer, Z. 1999. Assessment of active and passive restraint during guided reaching after chronic brain injury. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 27:805–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridding, M.C., Sheean, G., Rothwell, J.C., Inzelberg, R., and Kujirai, T. 1995. Changes in the balance between motor cortical excitation and inhibition in focal, task specific dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 59:493–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J., Brand, M., Fuchs, M.B., and Arcan, M. 2001. A myosignal based powered exoskeleton system. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 31(3).

  • Sabatini, U., Toni, D., Pantano, P. et al. 1994. Motor recovery after early brain damage. Stroke, 25:514–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefan, K., Kunesch, E., Cohen, L.G., Benecke, R., and Classen, J. 2000. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain, 123:572–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triolo, R.J. and Moscowitz, G.D. 1985. A multi-channel time series myoprocessor for robust classification of limb functiona and estimation of muscle force. In IEEE Proc. 7th Annual Conf. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc..

  • Volpe, B.T., Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Edelstein, L., Diels, C.M., and Aisen, M.L. 1999. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology, 53:1874–1876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, B.T., Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Edelstein, L., Diels, C.M., and Aisen, M. 2000. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot aided sensorymotor stimulation. Neurology, 54:1938–1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, B.T., Krebs, H.I., and Hogan, N. 2001. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Current Opinion in Neurology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

  • Williams, D.J., Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N. 2001. A Robot for wrist rehabilitation. IEEE-23rd EMBS.

  • Wu, C.-Y., Trombly, C.A., Lin, K.-C., and Tickle-Degnen, L. 1998. Effects of object affordances on movement performance: A metaanalysis. Scandinavian J. of Occupational Therapy, 5:83–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Newman Laboratory for Biomechanics and Human Rehabilitation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave, 3-137, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA

    H.I. Krebs, J.J. Palazzolo & N. Hogan

  2. Department Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Medical Research Institute, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, White Plains, NY, USA

    H.I. Krebs & B.T. Volpe

  3. Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy

    L. Dipietro

  4. Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, White Plains, NY, USA

    M. Ferraro, J. Krol & K. Rannekleiv

  5. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA

    N. Hogan

Authors
  1. H.I. Krebs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J.J. Palazzolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Dipietro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Ferraro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Krol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. K. Rannekleiv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. B.T. Volpe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. N. Hogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krebs, H., Palazzolo, J., Dipietro, L. et al. Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy. Autonomous Robots 15, 7–20 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024494031121

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024494031121