Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding the Shu–Osher Conservative Finite Difference Form

  • Published:
Journal of Scientific Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shu and Osher introduced a conservative finite difference discretization for hyperbolic conservation laws using nodal values rather than the traditional cell averages. Their form was obtained by introducing mathematical relations that simplify the resulting numerical methods. Here we instead “derive” their form from the standard cell average approach. In the process, we clarify the origin of their relations and the properties of this formulation. We also investigate the extension of their form to non-uniform grids. We show the strict conservation form only extends to grids with quadratic or exponential stretching. However, a slight generalization can be applied to all smoothly stretched grids with no loss of essential properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A. (1972). Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover Publications, New York, USA, ISBN 0-486-61272-4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harten, A. (1995). Multiresolution algorithms for the numerical solution of hyperbolic conservation laws. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 48, 1305-1342.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harten, A. Multiresolution Representation of Data. II. General Framework, UCLA Computational and Applied Math Report 94-10, April 1994. See also CAM Reports 93-03, 93-06, 93-13, 93-26 (with Donat, R.), 94-12, and 94-21 at www.math.ucla.edu/applied/cam/index.html.

  4. LeVeque, R. J. (1992). Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, Birkhäuser Verlag, Boston, USA, ISBN 3-8176-2723-5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Osher, S., and Chakravarthy, S. (1983). Upwind schemes and boundary conditions with applications to euler equations in general geometries. J. Comput. Phys. 50, 447-481.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shu, C. W., and Osher, S. (1988). Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77, 429-471.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shu, C. W., and Osher, S. (1989). Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes II. J. Comput. Phys. 83, 32-78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merriman, B. Understanding the Shu–Osher Conservative Finite Difference Form. Journal of Scientific Computing 19, 309–322 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025312210724

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025312210724

Navigation