Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Information Technology Investments: Characteristics, Choices, Market Risk and Value

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The decisions confronting information technology (IT) managers have changed a great deal since the early 1970s. The key decisions three decades ago were related to the management of application development projects and operations centers. Today, the key decisions are quite different. What level of service should the firm provide end-users? Should IT services, development projects and the ownership and management of operations centers be outsourced? IT investments attempt to satisfy specific needs. Because of environmental differences and differences in the cost structure and benefits of alternative ways in which these needs can be met, the answers to these questions may differ across firms. Modern financial analysis can provide insights to help managers deal with many of the problems they currently face. We use modern financial theory to show how the value of IT investments can be affected by some of the choices made by managers. We show how the market risk of demand and the market risk of costs affect the market risk and value of IT investments. We consider three types of investment decisions: outsourcing versus in-house services; investments in interorganizational systems; and determining the optimal level of IT services that should be provided. Our analysis indicates that: (1) as the market risk of demand for operations decreases, firms are less likely to outsource operations; (2) the value of an investment in an interorganizational system increases as the market risk of costs increases; and (3) the optimal level of user service is inversely related to service demand risk and is directly related to the market risk of service costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander GJ, Sharpe WF. Fundamentals of Investments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Kauffman RJ. Case study of electronic banking at Meridian Bancorp. Information and Software Technology 1991;33(3): 200-2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benaroch M, Kauffman RJ. A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investment. Information Systems Research 1999;10(1):70-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benaroch M, Kauffman RJ. Justifying electronic banking network expansion using real options analysis. MIS Quarterly 2000;24(2): 197-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E. Technology's true payoff. InformationWeek 1994; 496(October 10):34-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science 1996;42(4):541-558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JA. Real options analysis of the timing of IT investment decisions. Information and Management 2002;39:337-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhury A, Nam K, Rao HR. Management of outsourcing: A bidding perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 1995;12(2):131-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: In search of the independent variable. Information Systems Research 1992;3(1):60-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos BL. Justifying investments in new information technologies. Journal of Management Information Systems 1991;7(4):71-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos BL, Peffers K. Rewards to investors in innovative information technology applications: First movers and early followers in ATMs. Organization Science 1995;6(3):241-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos BL, Peffers K, Mauer DC. The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Information Systems Research 1993;4(1):1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Litzenberger RH. Foundations for Financial Economics. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson HR, Vitale MR. Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational systems. MIS Quarterly 1993;12(2):152-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambil A, Henderson J, Mohsenzadeh H. Strategic management of information technology investments: An options perspective. In: Banker RD, Kauffman RJ, Mahmood MA, eds. Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage. Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing, 1993:163-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman RJ, Kriebel CH. Measuring and modeling the business value of IT. In: Strassman PA, Berger P, Swanson EB, Kriebel CH, Kauffman RJ, eds. Measuring Business Value of Information Technologies. ICIS Press, 1988:93-120.

  • Kauffman RJ, Lally L. Value platform analysis perspective on customer access information technology. Decision Sciences 1994;25(5/6):767-794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen PGW.Value analysis: Justifying decision support systems. MIS Quarterly 1981;5(1):1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • King JL, Schrems EL. Cost-benefit analysis in information systems development and operation. Computing Surveys 1978;10(1):19-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity MC, Hirschheim R. Information Systems Outsourcing: Myths, Metaphors and Reality. New York: Wiley, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Kim Y. Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing: Conceptual framework and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems 1999;15(4):29-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis I. Logistics and electronic commerce: An interorganizational systems perspective. Transportation Journal 2001;40(4):5-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh L, Venkatraman N. Diffusion of information technology outsourcing: Influence sources and the kodak effect. Information Systems Research 1992;3(4):334-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone TW, Yates J, Benjamin RI. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM 1987;30(6):484-497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelker GN, Rhee SG. The impact of the degrees of operating and financial leverage on systematic risk of common stock. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1984;18(1):45-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay T, Barua A, Kriebel CH. Information technologies and business value-an analytic and empirical-investigation. Information Systems Research 1995;6(2):U2-U2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam K, Rajagopalan S, Rao HR, Chaudhury A. A two-level investigation of information systems outsourcing. Communications of the ACM 1996;39(7):36-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassman PA. Management productivity as an IT measure. In: Strassman PA, Berger P, Swanson EB, Kriebel CH, Kauffman RJ, eds. Measuring Business Value of Information Technologies. ICIT Press, 1988.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Information Systems, College of Business & Public Administration, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA

    Brian L. Dos Santos

Authors
  1. Brian L. Dos Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dos Santos, B.L. Information Technology Investments: Characteristics, Choices, Market Risk and Value. Information Systems Frontiers 5, 289–301 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025653428097

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025653428097

Keywords

Search

Navigation