Skip to main content
Log in

Similarity Relations and the Preservation of Solidity

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The partitions of a given set stand in a well known one-to-onecorrespondence with the equivalence relations on that set. We askwhether anything analogous to partitions can be found which correspondin a like manner to the similarity relations (reflexive, symmetricrelations) on a set, and show that (what we call) decompositions – of acertain kind – play this role. A key ingredient in the discussion is akind of closure relation (analogous to the consequence relationsconsidered in formal logic) having nothing especially to do with thesimilarity issue, and we devote a final section to highlighting some ofits properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacon, J., 1988, “Four modal modellings, ” Journal of Philosophical Logic 17, 91-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chajda, I., 1983, “Tolerance trivial algebras and varieties, ” Acta Scientarium Mathematicarum 46, 35-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humberstone, L., 1993, “Functional dependencies, supervenience, and consequence relations, ” Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2, 309-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humberstone, L., 1996, “Classes of valuations closed under operations Galois-dual to Boolean sentence connectives, ” Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University 32, 9-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1969, “Policing the aufbau, ” Philosophical Studies 20, 13-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1983, “New work for a theory of universals, ” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61, 343-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1999, Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ore, O., 1946, “Mappings of closure relations, ” Annals of Mathematics 47, 56-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreider, Ju.A., 1975, Equality, Resemblance and Order, Moscow: Mir Publishers. (Translated by Martin Greendlinger, with revisions, from the 1971 Russian original.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoesmith, D.J. and Smiley, T.J., 1978, Multiple-Conclusion Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. and Hazen, A.P., 1992, “Flexibly structured predication, ” Logique et Analyse 35, 374-393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T., 1988, “First-order logics for comparative similarity, ” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29, 457-481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wó jcicki, R., 1988, Theory of Logical Calculi, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hazen, A., Humberstone, L. Similarity Relations and the Preservation of Solidity. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13, 25–46 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026132413897

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026132413897

Navigation