Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-Service Facility Location Models

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multi-service facility (MSF) concept proposes the co-location of a range of human services under a single roof. Thus, for example, services for preschoolers, teens, and seniors might be co-located within a joint facility. MSFs are a response to economies of scale; co-location reduces the monetary costs of providing a variety of services. Yet, the spatial distributions of different societal groups are different within a city – an MSF system will not provide optimum geographical accessibility to individual groups. We introduce two p-median based location–allocation models that trade off the fixed costs of providing services and opening facilities with the travel costs of three societal groups. We observe that some mixes of single- and multi-service facilities can provide efficient service systems without unduly compromising the accessibility needs of individual groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burgess, E.W. (1925). “Growth of the City.” In R.E. Park, E.W. Burgess, and R.D. Mckenzie (eds.), The City, Chicago, Illinois. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Current, J., H. Min, and D. Schilling. (1990). “Multiobjective Analysis of Facility Location Decisions.” European Journal of Operational Research 49, 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, K. (1981). Human Services Today. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, S. and G. Horton. (1975). Integration of Human Services. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamacher, H.W., M. Labbé, and S. Nickel. (1999). “Multicriteria Network Location Problems with Sum Objectives.” Networks 33, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanjoul, P. and D. Peeters. (1985). “A Comparison of Two Dual-Based Procedures for Solving the p-Median Problem.” European Journal of Operational Research 20, 387–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, M.J. (2002). “Data Surrogation Error in p-Median Models.” Annals of Operations Research 110, 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, M.J. and P. Bayne. (1990). “Accessibility Implications of the Multiservice Centre Concept for Edmonton.” In P.J. Smith and E.L. Jackson (eds.), A World of Real Places: Essays in Honour of William C. Wonders, Department of Geography, The University of Alberta, pp. 22–33.

  • Kuehn, A.A. and M.J. Hamburger. (1963). “A Heuristic Program for Locating Warehouses.” Management Science 9, 643–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcginnis, L.F. and J.A. White. (1978). “A Single Facility Rectilinear Location Problem with Multiple Criteria.” Transportation Science 12(3), 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdie, R.A. (1969). “Factorial Ecology of Metropolitan Toronto, 1951–1961: An Essay on the Social Geography of the City.” Department of Geography, University of Chicago, Research Paper No. 116. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puerto, J. and F.R. Fernández. (1999). “Multi-Criteria Minisum Facility Location Problems.” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 8, 268–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, C.S. and R.W. Swain. (1970). “Central Facilities Location.” Geographical Analysis 2, 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G.T. and R.M. Soland. (1980). “A Multicriteria Approach to the Location of Public Facilities.” European Journal of Operational Research 4, 307–321.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, T., Hodgson, M.J. Multi-Service Facility Location Models. Annals of Operations Research 123, 223–240 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026183515320

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026183515320

Keywords

Navigation