Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Science cited in patents: A geographic "flow" analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interplay and cross-fertilization between science and technology, but also the specific role of science for technological development, have received ample attention in both the research and the policy communities. It is in this context that the concepts of “absorptive capacity” and “knowledge spillovers” play an important role. We operationalize the science-technology link by quantifying and modeling bibliographic references to the scientific literature as they occur in patents. This approach allows exploring the associative patterns between science creation (as emerging from the scientific literature) and technology development (as emerging from the patent literature). In the current paper, we focus on an analysis of the geographic distribution of the science citation patterns in patents, singling out two fields of (different) technological development, namely biotechnology and information technology. In both fields, the science citation flows from the European, Japanese and US science bases into USPTO and EPO-patents are explored and modeled. Intensive geographic citation flows between the regions are identified, pointing (amongst others) to the strength of both the US and the European science bases as sources for technological activity and creativity around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALLeN, T. J. (1977), Managing the Flow of Technology, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANDeRSEN, B. (2001), Technological Change and the Evolution of Corporate Innovation, Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • ARROW, K. (1994), The production and distribution of knowledge, In: G. SILVERBERG, L. SOETE (Eds), The Economics of Growth and Technical Change.

  • BAUMOL, W. (2002), The Free Market Innovation-Machine, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CASSIMAN, B., R. VEUGELeRS (2002), R&D cooperation and spillovers: some evidence from Belgium, American Economic Review, forthcoming.

  • COHEN, W. M., D. A. LeVINTHAL (1990), Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLLINS, P., S. WYATT (1988), Citations in patents to the basic research literature, Research Policy, 17: 65-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVID, P., D. FORAY (1995), Accessing and Expanding the Science and Technology Base, STI Review, pp. 13-68 (OECD, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBACKERE, K., M. A. RAPPA (1995), Institutional variations in problem choice and persistence among scientists, Research Policy, 23 (4): 425-441.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOSI, G. (2000), Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOSI, G., S. FABIANI (1994), Convergence and divergence in the long-term growth of open economics, In: Silverberg & Soete (Eds).

  • ERNST & YOUNG (2000), Evolution, Ernst & Young's Seventh Annual European Life Sciences Report, Life Science Group.

  • ETZKOWITZ, H., L. Leydesdorff (1997), Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Science and Public Policy, 24 (1): 2-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • ETZKOWITZ, H., L. Leydesdorff (1998), The endless transition: A 'Triple Helix' of university industry-government relations, Minerva, 36: 203-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LeYDeSDORFF (2000), The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29: 109-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1997), The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy, TSER, DG Science Research and Development, EUR 18307 EN.

  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1999), Knowledge and Learning-Towards a Learning Europe, Futures Report Series 14, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), The Futures Project, EUR 19034 EN.

  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2003), European Innovation Scoreboard 2002.

  • FREEMAN, C. (1994), The economics of technical change, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18: 463-514.

    Google Scholar 

  • GIBBONS, M., C. LIMOGES, H. NOWOTNY, S. SCHWARTZMAN, P. SCOTT, M. TROW (1994), The New Production of Knowledge, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRILICHES, Z. (1990), Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 28: 1661-1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRUPP, H. (1998), Foundations of the Economics of Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRUPP, H., U. SCHMOCH (1992), Perception of scientification of innovation as measured by referencing between patents and papers, In: H. GRUPP (Ed.), Dynamics of Science-based Innovations, Springer Publishers, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 73-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAFFE, A. B., M. TRAJTENBERG, M. S. FOGERTY (2000), Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations — Evidence from a Survey of Inventors, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (MA), www.nber.oreg/sloan/jaffe.html

    Google Scholar 

  • LeYDeSDORFF, L., H. ETZKOWITZ (1996), Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Science and Public Policy, 23 (5): 279-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeYDeSDORFF, L., H. ETZKOWITZ (1998), Triple Helix of innovation: introduction, Science and Public Policy, 25 (6): 358-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEYER, M. (2000a), Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature, Research Policy, 29 (3): 409-434.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEYER, M. (2000b), What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations, Scientometrics, 49 (1): 93-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEYER-KRAHMER, F. (2000), Increasing role of Basic Research for Innovation: The Case of Science Based Technologies. Empirical Evidence and Institutional Consequences, ISI Karlsruhe, Conference Paper.

  • NARIN, F., D. OLIVASTRO (1992), Status report: Linkage between technology and science, Research Policy, 21: 237-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • NARIN, F., D. OLIVASTRO (1998), Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison, Scientometrics, 41: 51-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • NARIN, F., E. NOMA (1985), Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7 (3-6): 369-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • NARIN, F., K. S. HAMILTON, D. OLIVASTRO (1997), The increasing linkage between US technology and science, Research Policy, 26: 317-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • NARIN, F., M. ALBERT, P. KROLL, D. HICKS (2000), The Link Between Australian Patenting and Basic Science-Inventing our Future, Report to the Australian Research Council, Canberra.

  • NELSON, R. R. (1994), What has been the matter with neoclassical growth theory? In: SILVERBERG & SOETE (Eds).

  • NELSON, R. R., S. G. WINTER (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001), Science, Technology, and Industry Outlook-Drivers of Growth: Information Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Paris, France.

  • PAVITT, K. (1984), Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, 13: 343-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • POLT, W., C. RAMMER, D. SCHARTINGNEARIN, H. GASSLeR, A. SCHIBANY (2000), Benchmarking industry-science relations in Europe-The role of framework conditions, Conference on: Benchmarking Europe's Industrial Competitiveness. A benchmarking project on industry-science relations (ISR).

  • SCHERER, F. M. (1985), Innovation and Growth, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHMOCH, U. (1993), Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators, Scientometrics, 26 (1): 193-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • SENKER, J. (1993), The contribution of tacit knowledge to innovation, AI & Society, 7: 208-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • SENKER, J. (1995), Tacit knowledge and models of innovation, Industrial and Corporate Change, 4 (2): 425-447.

    Google Scholar 

  • SILVERBERG, G., L. SOETE (Eds) (1994), The Economic Growth and Technical Change: Technologies, Nations, Agents, Elgar Aldershot.

  • SOLOW, R. M. (1997), Learning from 'Learning by Doing' Lessons for Economic Growth, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van LOOY, B., E. ZIMMERMANN, R. VEUGELeRS, A. VERBEEK, J. MELLO, K, DeBACKERE (2003), Do science-technology interactions pay off when developing technology? An exploratory investigation of 10 science-intensive technology domains, forthcoming in Scientometrics, 57 (3): 355-367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van VIANEN, B. G., H. F. MOED, A. F. J. Van RAAN (1990), An exploration of the science base of recent technology, Research Policy, 19: 61-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • VERBEEK, A., K. DeBACKERE, M. LUWEL, P. ANDRIES, E. ZIMMERMANN, F. DeLeUS (2002a), Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes, Scientometrics, 54 (3): 399-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • VERBEEK, A., P. ANDRIES, J. CALLAERT, K. DeBACKERE, M. LUWEL, R. VEUGELeRS (2002b), Linking Science to Technology, Bibliographic References in Patents-Science and Technology Interplay: Policy relevant findings and interpretations, European Commission, Brussels, EUR 20492, Vol. 1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Division Incentim & Faculty of Applied Economics, K.U. Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Arnold Verbeek

  2. INCENTIM Research Division, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven (, Belgium

    Koenraad Debackere

  3. Ministry of the Flemish Community, Boudewijngebouw, Brussels (, Belgium

    Marc Luwel

Authors
  1. Arnold Verbeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Koenraad Debackere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc Luwel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnold Verbeek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verbeek, A., Debackere, K. & Luwel, M. Science cited in patents: A geographic "flow" analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents. Scientometrics 58, 241–263 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026232526034

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026232526034

Keywords

Search

Navigation