Skip to main content
Log in

Rereading Gentzen

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Beth, E.: 1955, ‘Semantic Entailement and Formal Derivability’, Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afd. Letterkunde, 18, 309–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzen, G.: 1934-35, ‘Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen’, Mathematische Zeitschrift 39, 176–210, 405-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzen, G.: 1936, ‘Die Widerspruchsfreiheit der reinen Zahlentheorie’, Mathematische Annalen 112, 493–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzen, G.: 1938, ‘Neue Fassung des Widerspruchsfreiheitsbeweises für die reine Zahlentheorie’, Forschungen zur Logik und zur Grundlegung der exakten Wissenschaften 4, 19–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzen, G.: 1943, ‘Beweisbarkeit und Unbeweisbarkeit der Anfangsfällen der transfiniten Induktion in der reinen Zahlentheorie’, Mathematische Annalen 120, 140–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzen, G.: 1969, The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, M. Szabo (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and U. Remes: 1975, The Method of Analysis, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketonen, O.: 1944, Untersuchungen zum Prädikatenkalkül, Helsinki (Annales Acad. Sci. Fenn, Ser. A.I. 23).

  • Leivant, D.: 1979, ‘Assumption Classes in Natural Deduction’, Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 25, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäenpää, P.: 1993, The Art of Analysis: Logic and History of Problem Solving, Dissertation, Helsinki.

  • Mäenpää, P.: 1997, ‘From Backward Reduction to Configurational Analysis’, in M. Otte and M. Panza (eds.), Analysis and Synthesis in Mathematics, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 201–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P.: 1984, Intuitionistic Type Theory, Bibliopolis, Naples.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzler-Trott, E.: 2001, Gentzens Problem: mathematische Logik im nazionalsozialistischen Deutschland, Birkhauser, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri, S.: 1999, ‘Natural Deduction and Normal Form for Intuitionistic Linear Logic’, Archive for Mathematical Logic, in press.

  • Negri, S. and J. von Plato: 1999, ‘Sequent Calculus in Natural Deduction Style’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, in press.

  • Negri, S. and J. von Plato: 2001, Structural Proof Theory, Cambridge University Press.

  • von Plato, J.: 2001a, ‘A Proof of Gentzen's Hauptsatz without Multicut’, Archive for Mathematical Logic 40, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Plato, J.: 2001b, ‘Natural Deduction with General Elimination Rules’, Archive for Mathematical Logic, 40, 521–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, D.: 1965, Natural Deduction: A Proof-Theoretical Study, Almqvist & Wicksell, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, D.: 1971, ‘Ideas and Results in Proof Theory’, in J. Fenstad (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium, North-Holland, pp. 235–308.

  • Raggio, A.: 1965, ‘Gentzen's Hauptsatz for the systems NI and NK’, Logique et Analyse 8, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A.: 1935, ‘Review of Gentzen (1934-35)’, Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete 10, 145–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder-Heister, P.: 1984, ‘A Natural Extension of Natural Deduction’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 1284–1300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Von Plato, J. Rereading Gentzen. Synthese 137, 195–209 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026243304544

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026243304544

Navigation