Skip to main content
Log in

Psychologism and Metalogic

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines two arguments againstpsychologism advanced by Frege andHusserl. The first argument says that thelaws of logic cannot be justified by thelaws of psychology, because the formerand a priori and certain, but the latterare probable only. The second argumentpoints out that the status of logicallaws as universal principles of thinking isnot intelligible on the psychologisticinterpretation of logic. The author tries toshow how to examine both arguments bymetalogical devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Føllesdal, D.: 1982, Husserl und Frege: Ein Beitrag zur Beleuchtung der Enstehung der phänomenologische Philosophie, Aschehoug, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Føllesdal, D.: 1982a, 'Husserl's Conversion from Psychologism and the Vorstellung-Meaning-Reference Distinction: Two Separate Issues [Response to Mohanty 1982], in H. L. Dreyfuss and H. Hall (eds.), Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1884, Grundlagen der Arithmetik, eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl, Wilhelm Koebner, Breslau; Eng. tr. (by J. L. Austin), The Foundations of Arithmetic, Basil Blackwell, Oxford 1950, sec. rev. edition, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1893, Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, begrifsschriftlich abgeleitet, v. I, Hermann Pohle, Jena; partial Eng. tr. (by M. Furth), The Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Exposition of the System, University of California Press, Los Angeles and Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1918, ‘Der Gedanke’, Beiträge zur Philosophie der deutschen Idealismus 1, 289–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1969, Nachgelassene Schriften und wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, v. I, ed. by H. Hermes, F. Kambartel and F. Kaulbach with the assistance of G. Gabriel and W. Rödding, Felix Meiner, Hamburg; abridged Eng. tr. (by P. Long and R. White with the assistance of R. Hargreaves), Posthoumus Writings, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzegorczyk, A.: 1997, Logic-A Human Affair, Scholar, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1900, Logische Untersuchungen, v. I., Max Niemeyer, Halle; sec. rev. edition, 1913; Eng. tr. (by J. N. Findlay from 2nd edition), Logical Investigations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, M.: 1995, Psychologism. A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łukasiewicz, J.: 1907, ‘Logika a psychologia’ (Logic and Psychology), Przegl¸ad Filozoficzny X(1907), 489–491; repr. in J. Łukasiewicz, Z zagadnie´n logiki i filozofii (Problems of Logic and Philosophy), Pa´nstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa, 1961, pp. 63-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łukasiewicz, J.: 1929, Elementy logiki matematycznej, Nakladem Komisji Wydawniczej Kola Matematyczno-Fizycznego Sluchaczów Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 1929; Eng. tr. (by O. Wojtasiewicz), Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łukasiewicz, J.: 1957, Aristotle's Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, J.: 1986, A Border Place Dispute Place of Logic in Psychology, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, J. N.: 1982, ‘Husserl and Frege: A New Look at Their Relationship’, in H. L. Dreyfuss and H. Hall (eds.), Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, J. N.: 1982a, Husserl and Frege, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, W.: 1919, Logik, Psychologie und Psychologismus, Max Niemeyer, Halle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notturno, M. (ed.): 1989, Perspectives on Psychologism, Brill, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palágyi, M.: 1902, Der Streit der Psychologisten und Formalisten in der modernen Logik, Engelmann, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulkkinen, J.: 1994, The Threat of Logical Mathematism. A Study on the Critique of Mathematical Logic in Germany at the Turn of the 20th Century, Peter Lang, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath, M.: 1994, Der Psychologismusstreit in der deutschen Philosophie, Karl Alber, Freiburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluga, H.: 1980, Gottlob Frege, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Wole´nski, J.: 1998, ‘Logic from a Metalogical Point of View’, in E. Orlowska (ed.), Logic at Work. Essays Dedicated to the Memory of Helena Rasiowa, Physica-Verlag A Springer Verlag Company, Berlin 1998, ss. 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woleński, J. Psychologism and Metalogic. Synthese 137, 179–193 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026291203636

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026291203636

Keywords

Navigation