Skip to main content
Log in

Accurate Solution to Overdetermined Linear Equations with Errors Using L1 Norm Minimization

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been known for many years that a robust solution to an overdetermined system of linear equations Axb is obtained by minimizing the L1 norm of the residual error. A correct solution x to the linear system can often be obtained in this way, in spite of large errors (outliers) in some elements of the (m × n) matrix A and the data vector b. This is in contrast to a least squares solution, where even one large error will typically cause a large error in x. In this paper we give necessary and sufficient conditions that the correct solution is obtained when there are some errors in A and b. Based on the sufficient condition, it is shown that if k rows of [A b] contain large errors, the correct solution is guaranteed if (mn)/n ≥ 2k/σ, where σ > 0, is a lower bound of singular values related to A. Since m typically represents the number of measurements, this inequality shows how many data points are needed to guarantee a correct solution in the presence of large errors in some of the data. This inequality is, in fact, an upper bound, and computational results are presented, which show that the correct solution will be obtained, with high probability, for much smaller values of mn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T.J. Abatzoglou, J.M. Mendel, and G.A. Harada, “The constrained total least squares technique and its application to harmonic superresolution,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 39, pp. 1070-1087, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Barkhuijsen, R. De Beer, and D. Van Ormondt, “Improved algorithm for noniterative time-domain model fitting to exponentially damped magnetic resonance signals,” J. Magnetic Resonance, vol. 73, pp. 553-557, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. Barrodale, “L1 approximation and the analysis of data,” Appl. Stat., vol. 17, pp. 51-57, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Barrodale and F.D.K. Roberts, “An improved algorithm for discrete L 1 linear approximation,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 10, pp. 839-848, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Barrodale and A. Young, “Algorithms for best L 1 and L∞ linear approximations on a discrete set,” Numer. Math., vol. 8, pp. 295-306, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Bjorck, Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems, SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. De Beer and D. Van Ormondt, “Analysis of NMR data using time-domain fitting procedures,” in In-vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy I: Probeheads, Radiofrequency Pulses, Spectrum Analysis, NMR Basic Principles and Progress 26, M. Rudin (Ed.), Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1992, pp. 201-248.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.E. Dielman, “Least absolute value estimation in regression models: An annotated bibliography,” Commun. Statistical-Theor. Meth., vol. 13, pp. 513-541, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.E. Dielman and E.L. Rose, “Forecasting in least absolute value regression with autocorrelated errors: A small sample study,” Int. J. Forecast, vol. 10, pp. 539-547, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Dupacova, “Robustness of L 1 regression in the light of linear programming,” in L 1-statistical Analysis and Related Methods, Y. Dodge (Ed.), North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Kumaresan and D.W. Tufts, “Estimating the parameters of exponentially damped sinusoids and pole-zero modeling in noise,” IEEE Trans. on Acoust., Speech, and Signal Process., vol. 30, pp. 833-840, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Ljung, System Identification Theory for the User, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P.W. Mielke, Jr and K.J. Berry, “Permutation-based multivariate regression analysis: The case for least sum of absolute deviations regression,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 74, pp. 259-268, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.C. Narula and J.F. Wellington, “The minimum sum of absolute errors regression: A state of the art survey,” Int. Statist. Rev., vol. 50, pp. 317-326, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.A. Rahman and K.B. Yu, “Total least squares approach for frequency estimation using linear prediction,” IEEE Trans. Acous. Speech Signal Process., vol. 35, pp. 1440-1454, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.R. Rice and J.S. White, “Norms for smoothing and estimation,” SIAM Rev., vol. 6, pp. 243-256, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.B. Rosen, H. Park, and J. Glick, “Total least norm formulation and solution for structured problems,” SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., vol. 17, pp. 110-128, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.B. Rosen, H. Park, and J. Glick, “Structured total least norm for nonlinear problems,” SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., vol. 20, pp. 14-30, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.B. Rosen, H. Park, and J. Glick, “Signal identification using a least L 1 norm algorithm,” Optimization & Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 51-65, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P.J. Rousseeuw and A.M. Leroy, Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, John Wiley: New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Van Huffel, H. Park, and J.B. Rosen, “Formulation and solution of structured total least norm problems for parameter estimation,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 44, pp. 2464-2474, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Van Huffel and J. Vandewalle, The Total Least Squares Problem, Computational Aspects and Analysis, SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosen, J.B., Park, H., Glick, J. et al. Accurate Solution to Overdetermined Linear Equations with Errors Using L1 Norm Minimization. Computational Optimization and Applications 17, 329–341 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026562601717

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026562601717

Navigation