Skip to main content
Log in

A Modular Self-Reconfigurable Bipartite Robotic System: Implementation and Motion Planning

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this manuscript, we discuss I-Cubes, a class of modular robotic system thatis capable of reconfiguring itself in 3-D to adapt to its environment. This is abipartite system, i.e., a collection of (i) active elements for actuation, and (ii)passive elements acting as connectors. Active elements (links) are 3-DOFmanipulators that are capable of attaching/detaching from/to the passive elements(cubes), which can be positioned and oriented using links. Self-reconfigurationcapability enables the system to perform locomotion tasks over difficult terrain; theshape and size can be changed according to the task. This paper describes the designof the system, and 3-D reconfiguration properties. Specifics of the hardwareimplementation, results of the experiments with the current prototypes, our approachto motion planning and problems related to 3-D motion planning are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Casal, A. and Yim, M. 1999. Self-reconfiguration planning for a class of modular robots. In Proc. SPIE, Sensor Fusion and Decentr. Ctrl. in Rob.Syst. II, Vol. 3839, pp. 246–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castano, A., Shen, W.-M., and Will, P. 2000. CONRO: Towards deployable robots with inter-robot metamorphic capabilities. Auto. Robots, 8(3):309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, I.-M. 1994. Theory and application of modular reconfigurable robotic systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Mech. Engg., California Institute of Technology.

  • Chirikjian, G. and Pamecha, A. Bounds for self-reconfiguration of metamorphic robots. Technical Report RMS–9–95–1, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

  • Chirikjian, G., Pamecha, A., and Ebert-Uphoff, I. 1996. Evaluating efficiency of self-reconfiguration in a class of modular robots. J. of Rob. Syst., 13(5):317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda, T. and Kawauchi,Y. 1990. Cellular robotic system (CEBOT) as one of the realization of self-organizing intelligent universal manipulator. In IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 662–667.

  • Grabowski, R. et al. 2000. Heterogeneous teams of modular robots for mapping and exploration. Autonomous Robots, 8(3):293–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosokawa, K. et al. 1998. Mechanisms for self-organizing robots which reconfigure in a vertical plane. In Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, Vol. 3, T. Lueth et al. (Ed.), Springer-Verlag, pp. 111–118.

  • Kotay,K. and Rus, D. 1997. Self-reconfigurable robots for navigation and manipulation. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robots.

  • Kotay, K., Rus, D., Vona, M., and McGray, C. 1998. The selfreconfiguring molecule: Design and control algorithms. In Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics, P. Agrawal, L. Kavraki, and M. Mason (Eds.), A.K. Peters.

  • Murata, S., Kurokawa, H., Yoshida, E., Tomita, K., and Kokaji, S. 1998. A 3-D self-reconfigurable structure. In IEEE Intl. Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 432–439.

  • Neville, B. and Sanderson, A. 1996. Tetrabot family tree: Modular synthesis of kinematic structures for parallel robotics. In IEEE/RSJ International Symposium of Robotics Research, pp. 382–390.

  • Pamecha, A., Chiang, C.-J., Stein, D., and Chiricjian, G. 1996. Design and implementation of metamorphic robots. ASME Design Eng. Tech. & Computers in Eng. Confs.

  • Pamecha, A., Ebert-Uphoff, I., Chirikjian, G. 1997. Useful metrics for modular robot motion planning. IEEE Trans. of Rob. & Auto., 13(4):531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paredis, C.J.J. and Khosla, P.K. 1993. Kinematic design of serial link manipulators from task specifications. Intl. Jour. of Robotic Research, 12(3):274–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ñnsal, C., Kiliççöte, H., and Khosla, P.K. 1999. I(CES)-cubes: A modular self-reconfigurable bipartite robotic system. In Proc. SPIE, Sensor Fusion and Decentralized Control in Robotic Systems II, Vol. 3839, pp. 258–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ñnsal C., Kiliççöte, H., and Khosla, P. 2000a. A modular selfreconfigurable bipartite robotic system: Implementation and motion planning. Tech. Rep., Institute for Complex Engineered Systems, Carnegie Mellon University.

  • Ñnsal C., Kiliççöte, H., and Khosla, P.K. 2000b. Mechatronic design of a modular self-reconfiguring robotic system. In IEEE Intl. Conf. on Rob. & Auto., pp. 1742–1747.

  • Yim, M. 1993. A reconfigurable modular robot with many modes of locomotion. In Proc. of JSME Intl. Conf. On Advanced Mechatronics, pp. 283–288.

  • Yim, M., Duff, D.G., and Roufas, K.D. 2000. PolyBot: A modular reconfigurable robot. In IEEE Intl. Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 514–520.

  • Yoshida, E., et al. 1998. Experiments of self-repairing modular machine. In Distributed Autonomous Rob. Systems Vol. 3, T. Lueth et al. (Eds.), Springer-Verlag, pp. 119–128.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ünsal, C., Kiliççöte, H. & Khosla, P.K. A Modular Self-Reconfigurable Bipartite Robotic System: Implementation and Motion Planning. Autonomous Robots 10, 23–40 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026592302259

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026592302259

Navigation