Skip to main content
Log in

Compositionality and Model-Theoretic Interpretation

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper studies the general implications of theprinciple of compositionality for the organization of grammar.It will be argued that Janssen's (1986) requirement that syntax andsemantics be similar algebras is too strong, and that the moreliberal requirement that syntax be interpretable into semanticsleads to a formalization that can be motivated and applied more easily,while it avoids the complications that encumber Janssen's formalization.Moreover, it will be shown that this alternative formalization evenallows one to further complete the formal theory of compositionality, inthat it is capable of clarifying the role played by translation,model-theoretic interpretation and meaning postulates,of which the latter two aspects received little or no attention inMontague (1970) and Janssen (1986).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adj (Goguen, J.A., Thatcher, J.W., Wagner, E.G., and Wright, J.B.), 1977, “Initial algebra semantics and continuous algebras,” Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 24, 68–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamut, L.T.F. (van Benthem, J., Groenendijk, J., de Jongh, D., Stokhof, M., and Verkuyl, H.), 1991, Logic, Language and Meaning. Volume I: Introduction to Logic. Volume II: Intensional Logic and Logical Grammar, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, P.-K. and Ladusaw, W., 1979, “Montague's 'Universal Grammar': An introduction for the linguist,” Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 185–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, H., 1993, “Studied flexibility. Categories and types in syntax and semantics,” ILLC Dissertation Series 1993–5, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

  • Janssen, T., 1986, Foundations and Applications of Montague Grammar. Part 1: Philosophy, Framework, Computer Science. Part 2: Applications to Natural Language, Amsterdam: CWI, Tracts 19 and 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R., 1970, “Universal grammar”, Theoria 36, 373–398. (Page references concern the reprint as Chapter 7 of Thomason, R., ed., 1974, Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of Richard Montague. New Haven: Yale University Press.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R., 1973, “The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English,” pp. 221–242 in Approaches to Natural Language. Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, J. Hintikka et al., eds., Dordrecht: Reidel. (Page references as for Montague (1970), Chapter 8.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B., 1984, “Compositionality,” pp. 281–311 in Varieties of Formal Semantics. Proceedings of the Fourth Amsterdam Colloquium, F. Landman and F. Veltman, eds., Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B., with Hendriks, H., 1997, “Montague Grammar”, pp. 5–92 in Handbook of Logic and Language, J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen, eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., 1980, “Universal algebra and model theory. Two excursions on the border,” Report ZW-7908, Department of Mathematics, Groningen University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hendriks, H. Compositionality and Model-Theoretic Interpretation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10, 29–48 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026592526654

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026592526654

Navigation