Skip to main content
Log in

Factors Affecting the Use of MIS as a Tool for Informing and Evaluating Teaching and Learning in Schools

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study looks at the way in which Management Information Systems (MISs) are being used in Primary Schools in Birmingham. Analysis was from data collected through a questionnaire, to a 50% sample of schools in May 1999 and semi structured interviews with a cross section of staff at 20 schools, conducted during the period September 1999 until September 2001. The findings indicate that despite an overwhelming acceptance of the value of such systems, they are generally being used to provide specific statutory returns and administrative type functions. This is as opposed to use as a constant monitoring tool for self-evaluation, performance management, alerting and feedback, which is then used to inform the teaching and learning process. The paper goes on to propose a hypothesis as to why this is occurring and makes suggestions as to how the situation may be remedied. The research and its findings are part of the LEAs continuous evaluation of the use of ICT in its schools and the remedies which follow are part of its planning for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alleyne, Karen (2001) A tracking system for a primary school. Unpublished dissertation for final year project, University of Central England, May.

  • Ayres, D., Nolan, C. J. P., and Visscher, A. J. (1998) Computerised school information systems: Researching New Zealand usage patterns and levels of use. In The Integration of Information for Educational Management, C. Fulmer, B. Barta, and P. Nolan (eds). Felicity Press, Whitefield, ME, pp. 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajec, M., Krisper, M., and Rupnik, R. (2000) Pathways in context. In Pathways to Institutional Improvement with Information Technology in Educational Management, C. J. P. Nolan, A. C. W. Fung, and M. A. Brown (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London, pp. 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2002) Teachers need more time to plan. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news, January.

  • BECTA (2002) Software index. http://www.becta.org.uk/slict/software/index.cfm, December.

  • BGfL (2002) Birmingham Grid for Learning Home Page. http://www.bgfl.org/bgfl/welcome.cfm, December.

  • Birmingham Advisory Support Service (BASS) (1998) School Improvement Butterflies. BASS Publications, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, M. J. and Pearse, N. D. (1998) Establishing a national, regional and local integrated approach to ITEM-UK consultation process 1997-98. In The Integration of Information for Educational Management. Felicity Press, Whitfield, ME, pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, Raymond E. (1962) Education and the Cult of Efficiency. University of Chicago Press.

  • CCM (2003) CCM software home page. http://www.ccmsoftware.com/, 28th April.

  • Date, C. J. (1983) Database: A Primer. Addison Wesley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • 98/part1.htm, 12 May 2003.

  • DfEE (1998b) Phase 2 Demonstration Project to Reduce the Bureaucratic Burden on Teachers. Proposal from PricewaterhouseCoopers, 20 January.

  • DfEE (2000) Rationale and evidence base for investment in management (including administrative) ICT in schools. IMS Team, September. http://www.dfee.gov.uk/ims/ict%20/rationale.doc, 23 October.

  • DfES (2001a) Information management strategy for schools and local education authorities additional funding to support implementation: Letter to CEO's. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/ims/ceo120401.doc, 12 April.

  • DfES (2001b) Funds available in 2001-02 for managerial and administrative ICT in addition to the standard spending assessment. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/ims/annexbfunding.doc, 12 November.

  • DfES (2003) Information Management Skills for Success: Working Smarter Not Harder. DfES Publications.

  • Frank, E. P. and Fulmer, C. L. (1998) The dysfunctional side of educational organisations: Themes from clinical information system development. In The Integration of Information for Educational Management, C. Fulmer, B. Barta, and P. Nolan (eds). Felicity Press, Whitefield, ME, pp. 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. C.W., Visscher, A. J., Wild, P., and Selwood, I. D. (1998) SAMS in Hong Kong school: The first evaluative findings of a large-scale implementation of school management information systems. In The Integration of Information for Educational Management, C. Fulmer, B. Barta, and P. Nolan (eds). Felicity Press, Whitefield, ME, pp. 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig, G. (1999) Become a Class Apart, TES Online, 16 April.

  • NAS/UWT (2002) http://www.nasuwt-campaigns.org.uk/main.htm, 21 March.

  • National College for School Leadership (NCSL) (2003a) Home page. http://www.ncsl.org.uk/, 28 April.

  • National College for School Leadership (2003b) Home page. http://www.ncsl.org.uk/index.cfm?pageid=ldevstrategic-slict-index, 28 April.

  • NGfL (2002) National grid for learning home page. http://www.ngfl.gov.uk/, 3 December.

  • Nolan, C. J. P. and Ayres, D. A. (1996) Developing a good information system for schools: The New Zealand experience, International Journal of Educational Research, 25(4), 307–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, C. J. P. and Lambert, M. (2000) Information systems for leading and managing school: Changing the paradigm. In Pathways to Institutional Improvement with Information Technology in Educational Management, C. J. P. Nolan, A. C. W. Fung, and M. A. Brown (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, C. J. P., Fulmer, C. L., and Taylor, R. (1998) Four computerized school information systems: Summary Discussion. In The Integration of Information for Educational Management, C. Fulmer, B. Barta, and P. Nolan (eds). Felicity Press, Whitefield, ME, pp. 169–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, C. J. P., Fung, A. C. W., and Brown, M. A. (2000) Pathways in context. In Pathways to Institutional Improvement with Information Technology in Educational Management, C. J. P. Nolan, A. C. W. Fung, and M. A. Brown (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, C. J. P., Brown, M. A., and Graves, B. (2001) MUSAC in New Zealand: From grass roots to system-wide in a decade. In Information Technology in Educational Management: School Information Systems in the 21st Century, A. J. Visscher, P. Wild, and A. C.W. Fung (eds). Kluwer, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • OFSTED (2001) ICT in Schools; The Impact of Government Initiatives. An interim Report, April OFSTED Publications.

  • Selwood, I., Smith, D., and Wisehart, J. (2000) Supporting UK teachers through the national grid for learning. In Pathways to Institutional Improvement with Information Technology in Educational Management, C. J. P. Nolan, A. C. W. Fung, and M. A. Brown (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatnall, A., Davey, B., Burgess, S., et al. (2000) Management Information Systems: Concepts, Issues, Tools and Applications, 2nd edition. Data Publishing, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Goodby, P. and Lawson, R. (1993) Where we go from here; the new order in welfare. In Markets and Managers: New Issues in the Delivery of Welfare, P. Taylor-Goodby and R. Lawson (eds). Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachernet (2002a) DfES IM strategy documents. http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/Management/tools/ict/IMS//, 3 December.

  • PLASC/, 3 December.

  • Visscher, A. J. and Bloeman, P. P. M. (2000) CSIS usage in school management: A comparison of good and bad practice schools. In Pathways to Institutional Improvement with Information Technology in Educational Management, C. J. P. Nolan, A. C. W. Fung, and M. A. Brown (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh G. (2000) Managing assessement: Using technology to facilitate change. In Pathways to Institutional Improvement with Information Technology in Educational Management, C. J. P. Nolan, A. C. W. Fung, and M. A. Brown (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, P., Smith, D., and Walker, J. (2000) Has a decade of computerisation made a difference in school management? In Pathways to Institutional Improvement with Information Technology in Educational Management, C. J. P. Nolan, A. C. W. Fung, and M. A. Brown (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 99-120.

  • Willcocks, L. (1996) Rethinking capabilities and skills in the information systems function. In Proceedings: 7th Australian Conference on Information Systems, University of Tasmania, Hobart.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strickley, A. Factors Affecting the Use of MIS as a Tool for Informing and Evaluating Teaching and Learning in Schools. Education and Information Technologies 9, 47–66 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EAIT.0000024261.33160.41

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EAIT.0000024261.33160.41

Navigation