Skip to main content
Log in

Routing Strategies to Minimize Packet Loss in an Optical Packet Switched Network with Recirculating FDL Buffers

  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The major goal of optical packet switching (OPS) is to match switching technology to the huge capacities provided by (D)WDM. We study optical packet switches with recirculating fiber delay line (FDL) buffers. Through simulation, we have assessed the logical performance of a single optical packet router (OPR), focusing on packet loss rate (PLR). By verifying that our scheduling algorithm does not alter the traffic profile characteristics from in- to output, we illustrate how the single node results can be used to assess network-wide performance. We use the capability of assessing end-to-end PLRs to develop network-wide routing algorithms designed to minimize the maximal PLR occurring in the network. In case studies on pan-European networks, we first compare two algorithm variants and thereafter we compare the PLR-based routing algorithm with both load balancing and shortest path routing. While load balancing achieves PLRs that are multiple orders of magnitude lower than shortest path routing, the PLR-based algorithm can reach PLRs up to two orders of magnitude better. The improvement in PLR comes at the price of only a small increase in used bandwidth (a few percent). Subsequently we show that the discussed PLR-based routing algorithm can be easily extended to multiple priorities. By introducing multiple priorities we can keep the loss rates for high priority traffic very low. However, it may lead to an increase of the obtained minimal max-PLR value for low priority traffic. But as we prove this increase to be limited, the cost of introducing multiple priorities is small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Mukherjee, WDM optical communication networks: Progress and challenges, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 18, no. 10, (Oct. 2000), pp. 1810–1824.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Yao, B. Mukherjee, S. Dixit, Advances in photonic packet switching: An overview, IEEE Commun. Mag, vol. 38, no. 1, (Jan. 2000), pp. 84–94.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. K. Hunter, I. Andonovic, Approaches to optical internet packet switching, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 38, no. 9, (Sept. 2000), pp. 116–120.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Hill, F. Neri, eds., Optical switching networks: From circuits to packets, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 39, no. 3, (March 2001), pp. 107–148.

  5. C. Qiao, M. Yoo, Optical burst switching (OBS)—a new paradigm for an optical internet, J. High Speed Networks, vol. 8, no. 1, (Jan. 1999), pp. 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Qiao, Labeled optical burst switching for IP-over-WDM integration, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 38, no. 9, (Sept. 2000), pp. 104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. K. Hunter, et al., WASPNET—a wavelength switched packet network, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 37, no. 3, (March 1999), pp. 120–129.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. L. Danielsen, C. Joergensen, B. Mikkelsen, K. E. Stubkjaer, Analysis of a WDM packet switch with improved performance under bursty traffic conditions due to tuneable wavelength converters, IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 16, no. 5, (May 1998), pp. 729–735.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Yao, B. Mukherjee, S. J. Ben Yoo, S. Dixit, All-optical packet-switched networks: A study of contention-resolution schemes in an irregular mesh network with variable-sized packets, in: Proc. SPIE Vol. 4233, OPTICOMM 2000, Plano, TX, USA, (Oct. 2000), pp. 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Zang, J. P. Jue, B. Mukherjee, Capacity allocation and contention resolution in a photonic slot routing all-optical WDM mesh network IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Tech., vol. 18, no. 12, (Dec. 2000), pp. 1728–1741.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. K. Hunter, M. C. Chia, I. Andonovic, Buffering in optical packet switches, IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Tech., vol. 16, no. 12, (Dec. 1998), pp. 2081–2094.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Dittman, et al., The IST project DAVID: A viable approach towards optical packet switching, to be published in IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., http://david.com.dtu.dk.

  13. Chiaroni, et al., First demonstration of an asynchronous optical packet switching matrix prototype for MultiTerabitclass routers/switches, in: Proc. 27th European Conf. on Optical Communication, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (Sept. 30–Oct. 4, 2001), vol. 6, pp. 60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Develder, M. Pickavet, P. Demeester, Assessment of packet loss for an optical router with recirculating buffer, in: Proc. ONDM 2002 6th Working Conf. on Optical Network Design and Modeling, Turin, Italy, (Feb. 4–6, 2002), pp. 247–261.

  15. C. Develder, M. Pickavet, P. Demeester, Choosing an appropriate buffer strategy for an optical packet switch with a feed-back FDL buffer, in: Proc. 28th European Conf. on Optical Communication, Copenhague, Denmark, (Sept. 8–12, 2002), vol. 3, pp. 8.5.4 (2 pages).

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Develder, et al., Node architectures for optical packet and burst switching, in: Tech. Digest. Int. Topical Meeting on Photonics in Switching (PS2002), (invited) paper PS.WeA1, Cheju Island, Korea, (July 21–25, 2002), pp. 104–106.

  17. B. Fortz, M. Thorup, Internet traffic engineering by optimizing OSPF weights, in: Proc. IEEE Infocom 2000, Tel Aviv, Israel, (March 26–30, 2000), pp. 519–528.

  18. J. T. Moy, OSPF: Anatomy of an Internet Routing Protocol (Addison-Wesley, Feb. 1998).

  19. B. Davie, Y. Rekhter, MPLS: Technology and Applications (Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Jan. 2000).

  20. W. Willinger, et al., Self-similarity through high-variability: Statistical analysis of Ethernet LAN traffic at the source level, IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, vol. 5, no. 1, (Jan. 1997), pp. 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Pickavet, C. Develder, E. Baert, P. Demeester, A. I. Techniques for planning telecommunication networks, in: Proc. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence IC-AI'02, Las Vegas, NV, (June 24–27, 2002), vol. 2, pp. 608–614.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. De Maesschalck, et al., Pan-European optical transport networks: An availability-based comparison, Photonic Network Communications, vol. 5, no. 3, (May 2003), pp. 203–225. http://ibcn.atlantis.UGent.be/projects/COST266_IST_lion/NRS/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Develder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baert, E., Develder, C., Colle, D. et al. Routing Strategies to Minimize Packet Loss in an Optical Packet Switched Network with Recirculating FDL Buffers. Photonic Network Communications 7, 279–300 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PNET.0000026892.02534.ad

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PNET.0000026892.02534.ad

Navigation