Skip to main content
Log in

Managing Portfolios of Projects under Uncertainty

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Managers of projects and multi-project programs often face considerable uncertainty in the duration and outcomes of specific tasks, as well as in the overall level of resources required by tasks. They must decide, in these uncertain conditions, how to allocate and manage scarce resources across many projects that have competing needs. This paper develops a nonlinear mixed-integer programming model for optimizing the resource allocations to individual tasks to minimize the completion times of a collection of projects. The model contains a very flexible representation of the effects of changing resource allocations on the probability distribution of task duration, so it can accommodate a wide variety of practical situations. A heuristic solution procedure is proposed that works quite effectively. An illustration involving a collection of bridge construction projects is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertsekas, D., J.N. Tsitsiklis, and C. Wu. (1998). “Rollout Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization.” Journal of Heuristics 3, 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brucker, P., A. Drexel, R. Möhring, K. Neumann, and E. Pesch. (1999). “Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling: Notation, Classification, Models, and Methods.” European Journal of Operational Research 112, 3–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, J.M. (1977). “Planning and Dynamic Control of Projects under Uncertainty.” Management Science 24, 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendley, L.G. (1968). “Towards the Development of a Complete Multi-Project Scheduling System.” Journal of Industrial Engineering 19, 505–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak, Y. (2000). “On the Allocation of Uncertainty-Reduction Effort to Minimize Total Variability.” IIE Transactions 32, 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golenko-Ginzburg, D. and A. Gonik. (1997). “Stochastic Network Project Scheduling with Non-Con-sumable Limited Resources.” International Journal of Production Economics 48, 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutjahr, W.J., C. Strauss, and E. Wagner. (2000). “A Stochastic Branch-and-Bound Approach to Activity Crashing in Project Management.” INFORMS Journal on Computing 12, 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolisch, R. and A. Sprecher. (1996). “PSLIB-A Project Scheduling Problem Library.” European Journal of Operational Research 96, 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtulus, I.S. and E.W. Davis. (1982). “Multi-Project Scheduling: Categorization of Heuristic Rules Per-formance.” Management Science 28, 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtulus, I.S. and S.C. Narula. (1985). “Multi-Project Scheduling: Analysis of Project Performance.” IIE Transactions 17, 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leu, S.-S., A.-T. Chen, and C.-H. Yang. (2001). “A GA-Based Fuzzy Optimal Model for Construction Time-Cost Trade-off.” International Journal of Project Management 19, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lova, A., C. Maroto, and P. Tormos. (2000). “A Multicriteria Heuristic Method to Improve Resource Allo-cation in Multiproject Scheduling.” European Journal of Operational Research 127, 408–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, M. and S.M. AbouRizk. (2000). “Simplified CPM/PERT Simulation Model.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 126, 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhring, R.H., F.J. Radermacher, and G. Weiss. (1984). “Stochastic Scheduling Problems I-General Strategies.” Zeitschrift für Operations Research 28, 193–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhring, R.H., F.J. Radermacher, and G. Weiss. (1985). “Stochastic Scheduling Problems II-General Strategies.” Zeitschrift für Operations Research 29, 65–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdamar, L. and E. Alanya. (2001). “Uncertainty Modelling in Software Development Projects (with Case Study).” Annals of Operations Research 102, 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özdamar, L. and G. Ulusoy. (1995). “A Survey on the Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem.” IIE Transactions 27, 574–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritsker, A., C. Sigal, and R. Hammesfahr. (1989). SLAM II Network Models for Decision Support. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Y. and D. Gemmill. (1998). “Using Tabu Search to Schedule Activities of Stochastic Resource-Constrained Projects.” European Journal of Operational Research 111, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dorp, J.R. and M.R. Duffey. (1999). “Statistical Dependence in Risk Analysis for Project Networks Using Monte Carlo Methods.” International Journal of Production Economics 58, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamín, R. and D. Harmelink. (2001). “Comparision of Linear Scheduling Model (LSM) and Critical Path Method (CPM).” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 127, 374–381.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nozick, L.K., Turnquist, M.A. & Xu, N. Managing Portfolios of Projects under Uncertainty. Ann Oper Res 132, 243–256 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000045285.12058.03

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000045285.12058.03

Navigation