Skip to main content
Log in

Combined Ring–Mesh Optical Transport Networks

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date in Sonet and DWDM transport environments, we see two dominant principles for network survivability: ring and mesh. Although both are used, they are virtually always deployed and operated on geographically separate networks or regions, or applied on a ring-access and mesh-core principle. We describe a new approach for optimized design of ring and mesh network components in a single hybrid transport network. A key concept in design of these hybrids is the “clipping” of forcer spans in the mesh network design by strategically added rings. We present a formal optimization model and a heuristic to form sych hybrid designs with lower total cost than a pure-mesh design. These ideas on optical network architecture are especially relevant to industry practice with the advent of OXC systems with integrated add–drop multiplexer functionality and by the development of ultra long reach (ULR) optics. This integration of OXC-OADM functionality effectively removes any extra costs associated with transitions from a ring to mesh environment and ULR optics permit all-optical bypass of OXC nodes which enhances the cost-effectiveness of the hybrid architectures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.D. Allen, S. Nathan and J. Huang, Rings in a highly-connected network-an economic comparison, in: Proc. DRCN'98, Brugge, Belgium (May 1998) paper 042.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Doverspike, Trends in layered network management of ATM, Sonet, WDM technologies for network survivability and fault management, Journal of Network and Systems Management 5(2) (June 1997).

  3. P.F. Fonseca, Pan-European multi-wavelength transport networks: Network design, architecture, survivability and SDH networking, in: Proc. Design of Reliable Commun. Networks (DRCN'98), Brugge, Belgium (May 17-20, 1998) paper P3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W.D. Grover, Case studies of survivable ring, mesh, and mesh-arc hybrid networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM'92 (December 1992) pp. 633-638.

  5. W.D. Grover, Distributed restoration of the transport network, in: Telecommunications Network Management into the 21st Century, eds. S. Aidarous and T. Plevyak (IEEE Press, 1994) pp. 337-419.

  6. W.D. Grover and D.Y. Li, The forcer concept and express route planning in mesh survivable networks, Journal of Network and Systems Management 7(2) (February/March' 1999) 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Herzberg and S.J. Bye, An optimal spare-capacity assignment model for survivable networks with hop limits, in: IEEE Globecom '94 (1994) pp. 1601-1607.

  8. D.B. Johnson, Finding all the elementary circuits of a directed graph, SIAM J. Comput. 4 (1975) 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Lardies and A. Aguilar, Planning methodology for SDH + optical networks, in: First Int. Workshop on the Design of Reliable Comm. Networks, DRCN'98, Belgium (1998).

  10. D. Morley and W.D. Grover, Optimal loading of Sonet BLSRs: Assessment of benefits of demand splitting and time-slot interchange, in: Proc. Canadian Conference on Broadband Research (CCBR'98), Ottawa (June 12-24, 1998) pp. 135-144.

  11. C.H. Yang and S. Hasegawa, FITNESS: Failure immunization technology for network service survivability, in: Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM '88 (1988) pp. 47.3.1-47.3.5.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grover, W., Martens, R. Combined Ring–Mesh Optical Transport Networks. Cluster Computing 7, 245–258 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLUS.0000028003.65775.8d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLUS.0000028003.65775.8d

Navigation