Abstract
Recent research on small-world theory has been expanded upon organizations behavior. However, most individual studies have taken a simplified view of individuals and relationships among members by focusing on a single type of links mainly within dyadic relationships. In reality, members of organizations are interacting with each other and often connected via many types of links within more complex relationships. To explore this complex interaction, this study models organization as network and proposes a multiplex approach that captures the complexity of relationships among members in organizations. This approach accounts for the multiple types of links among members and the multiple roles of members within network organizations. It is illustrated via a case study of a network organization. The case study demonstrates how this approach could capture the many types of relationship among members as well as the various roles that members play within the network organization. Such an approach can yield new insights on how to better manage network organizations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ancona, D.G. (1990), “Outward Bound: Strategies forTeam Survival in anOrganization,” Academy of Management Journal, 33, 334–365.
Barker, J., D. Tjosvold and R. Andrew (1988), “Conflict Approaches of Effective and Ineffective Project Managers: A Field Study of Matrix Organization,” Journal of Management Studies, 25, 167–178.
Baum, J.C. and J.E. Dutton (1996), “Introduction: The Embeddedness of Strategy,” Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 1–15.
Brass, D.J. and M.E. Burkhardt (1992), “Centrality and Power in Organizations,” in N. Nohria and R.G. Eccles (Eds.) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
Burt, R.S. (1982), Toward A Structural Theory of Action. Academic Press, New York.
Carley, K.M. (1990), “Group Sability: A Socio-Cognitive Approach,” in E. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway and H. Walker (Eds.) Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research. Vol. VII. JAI Press, Greenwhich, CN.
Carley, K.M. (1991), “A Theory of Group Stability,” American Sociological Review, 56(3), 331–354.
Carley, K.M. and D. Krackhardt (1997), “A Typology for Network Measures for Organizations,” Computational Organization theory, 6(5), 122–138.
Carley, K.M and J.-S. Lee (1998), “Dynamic Organizations: Organizational Adaptation in a Changing Environment,” in J. Baum(Ed.) Advances in StrategicManagement, Vol. 15, Disciplinary Roots of Strategic Management Research. JAI.
Carley, K.M., J.-S. Lee and D. Krackhardt (2001), “Destabilizing Networks,” Available at http://hss.cmu.edu/ departments/sds/faculty/carley.html.
Carley, K.M. and D.M. Svoboda (1996), “Modeling Organizational Adaptation as a Simulated Annealing Process,” Sociological Methods and Research, 25(1), 138–168.
Clark, K. and T. Fujimoto (1991), Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Dacin, M.T., M.J. Ventrosca and B.D. Beal (1999), “The Embeddedness of Organizations: Dialogue and Directions,” Journal of Management, 25, 317–356.
Denison, D.R., S.L. Hart and J.A. Kahn (1996), “From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Dagnostic Model,” Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1005–1023.
Donnellon, A. (1995), Teamtalk. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Elgazzar, A.S. (2003), “Applications of Small-World Networks to Some Socio-Economic Systems,” Physica A, 324, 402–407.
Ford, R.C. and W.A. Randolph (1992), “Cross-Functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project Management,” Journal of Management, 18, 267–294.
Galbraith, J. (1994), Competing with Flexible Tateral Organizations, 2nd edition. Addison-Wesley Publish Co., Reading, MA.
Granovetter, M.S. (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
Haythornthwaite, C. and B. Wellman (1998), “Work, Friendship and Media for Information Exchange in a Networked Organization,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(12), 1101–1114.
Kaye, A.R. (1995), “Computer Supported Collaborative Learning,” in N. Heap, R. Thomas, G. Einon, R. Mason and H. MacKay (Eds.) Information Technology and Society. London, Sage.
Krackhardt, D. and K.M. Carley (1997), “A PCANS Models of Structure in Organizations,” in Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology, Monterray, CA.
Lazega, E. and P.E. Pattison (1999), “Multiplexity, Generalized Exchange and Cooperation in Organizations: A Case Study,” Social Networks, 21, 67–90.
Lin, Z. (1994), “ATheoretical Evaluation of Measures of Organizational Design: Interrelationship and Performance Predictability,” in K.M. Carley and M.J. Prietula (Eds.) Computational Organization Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Lindenberg, S. (1997), “Grounding Group in Theory: Functional, Cognitive, and Structural Interdependencies,” in Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 14. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
March, J.G. and H.A. Simon (1958), Organizations. Wiley, New York.
Milgram, S. (1967), “The Small-World Problem,” Psychology Today, 22, 661–667.
Nonaka, I. (1990), “Redundant Overlapping Organization: Japanese Approach to Managing the Innovation Process,” California Management Review, 32(2), 27–38.
Simon, H.A. (1976), Administrative Behavior, 2nd edition. The Free Press, New York.
Takeuchi, H. and I. Nonaka (1986), “The New Product Development Game,” Harvard Business Review, 64(1), 137–146.
Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Watts, D.J. (1999), Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness. Princedon University Press, Princedon.
Watts, D.J. and S.H. Strogatz (1998), “Collective Dynamics of 'Small World' Networks,” Nature, 393, 440–442.
Wellman, B. and S.D. Berkowitz (1998), Social Structures: A Network Approach.Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, MA, Cambridge.
Xi, Y. (1989), Harmony Theory and Strategy, Guizhou Renmin Publishers (in China).
Xi, Y. and F. Tang (2002), “Research of Organizational Multiplex Multi-Kernel Network Model,” Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Science eds.) (in China). 4, 430–435.
Xu, J., Y. Xi and Y. Wang (1993), “Core and Coritity Theory of System,” System Science and Mathematics (in China), 2, 102–111.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xi, Y., Tang, F. Multiplex Multi-Core Pattern of Network Organizations: An Exploratory Study. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 10, 179–195 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000039170.91349.c2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000039170.91349.c2