Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organizational Memory as Objects, Processes, and Trajectories: An Examination of Organizational Memory in Use

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For proper knowledge management, organizations must consider how knowledge is kept and reused. The term organizational memory is due for an overhaul. Memory appears to be everywhere in organizations; yet, the term has been limited to only a few uses. Based on an ethnographic study of a telephone hotline group, this paper presents a micro-level, distributed cognition analysis of two hotline calls, the work activity surrounding the calls, and the memory used in the work activity. Drawing on the work of Star, Hutchins, and Strauss, the paper focuses on issues of applying past information for current use. Our work extends Strauss' and Hutchins' trajectories to get at the understanding of potential future use by participants and its role in current information storage. We also note the simultaneously shared provenance and governance of multiple memories – human and technical. This analysis and the theoretical framework we construct should be to be useful in further efforts in describing and analyzing organizational memory within the context of knowledge management efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerman, M. S. (1993): Answer Garden: A Tool for Growing Organizational Memory. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Ackerman, M. S. (1996): Definitional and Contextual Issues in Organizational and Group Memories. Information Technology and People, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 10–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, M. S. and C. Halverson (2000): Re-Examining Organizational Memory. Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, M. S. and T. W. Malone (1990): Answer Garden:A Tool for Growing Organizational Memory. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Office Information Systems, Cambridge, MA. New York: ACM Press, pp. 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, M. S. and D. W. McDonald (1996): Answer Garden 2:Merging Organizational Memory with Collective Help. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '96), Cambridge, MA. New York: ACM Press, pp. 97–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, M. S. and L. Palen (1996): The Zephyr Help Instance: Promoting Ongoing Activity in a CSCW System. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '96), Vancouver. New York: ACM Press, pp. 268–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, M. S. and B. Starr (1996): Social Activity Indicators for Groupware. IEEE Computer, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. and W. Sharrock (1993): Can Organisations Afford Knowledge? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 123–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L. and S. Bødker (1997): Constructing Common Information Spaces. Proceedings of European Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conference.New York: Kluwer, pp. 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L. J. and K. Kuutti (1996): Shifting Perspectives on Organizational Memory:From Storage to Active Remembering. Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-29 ). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, pp. 156–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (1961): What Is History? New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A. (1990): The Integration of Distributed Knowledge in Collaborative Medical Diagnosis. In. J. Galegher and R. Kraut (eds.): Intellectual Teamwork:Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1997): Being There:Putting Brain,Body,and World Together Again.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. and Yrjo Engeström (1993): A Cultural-Historical Approach to Distributed Cognition. In G. Salomon (ed.): Distributed Cognitions:Psychological and Educational Considerations.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, Je. (1992): Corporate Memory. Proceedings of Groupware '92,San Jose, CA. San Mateo: Morgan-Kaufmann, pp. 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. and M. L. Begeman (1988): gIBIS:A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Portland, OR. New York: ACM Press, pp. 140–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant, D., S. Kiesler and L. Sproull (1994): What 's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing.Information Systems Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 400–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P. and J. Heritage (1992): Talk at Work:Interaction in Institutional Settings.New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, C. A. (1992): Analyzing a Cognitively Distributed System: A Terminal Radar Approach Control. Masters thesis, Cognitive Science, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, C. A. (1994): Distributed Cognition as a Theoretical Framework for HCI: Don 't Throw the Baby Out with the Bathwater-The Importance of the Cursor in Air Traffic Control.Technical Report 94-03.

  • Halverson, C. A. (1995): Inside the Cognitive Workplace:New Technology and Air Traffic Control. Ph. D. thesis, Cognitive Science, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, C. A. and M. S. Ackerman (2003): Yeah, the Rush ain 't Here yet - Take a Break. Proceedings of IEEE Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences (HICSS '03). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J. D.,E. L. Hutchins and D. Kirsh (2000): Distributed Cognition:Toward a New Theoretical Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 174–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1990): A Theory of the E.ects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design,Intelligence,and Decision Making. Academy of Management Review, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. and V. King, (1992): Paperwork. University of Lancaster, Esprit COMIC Project, COMIC-LANCS-4-1.

  • Hughes, J., J. O'Brien and M. Rouncefield (1995): Organisational Memory: Or How Can We Sack Mavis But Keep Her Brain. European CoTech Action Project (Common Organisational Spaces and Organizational Memory), Lancaster University,working paper COST-14, Lancaster.

  • Hutchins, E. (1988): The Technology of Team Navigation.In R.K.J. Galegher and C. Egido (eds.): Intellectual Teamwork:Social and Technical Bases of Cooperative Work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 191–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1991): The Social Organization of Distributed Cognition. In L. Resnick and J. Levine (eds.): Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, DC: APA Press, pp. 283–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995): Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995): How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds. Cognitive Science, vol. 19, pp. 265–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. and T. Klausen (1996): Distributed Cognition in an Airline Cockpit. In D. Middleton and Y. Engestrom (eds.): Communication and Cognition at Work.Beverly Hills,CA: Sage Books, pp. 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. and L. Palen (1993): Constructing Meaning from Space, Gesture and Talk. Proceedings of NATO Workshop on Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Situated Cognition and Technologically Supported Environments, pp. 23–29.

  • Jennex, M. E. and L. Olfman (2002): Organizational Memory/Knowledge Effects on Productivity, a Longitudinal Study.Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, pp. 1029–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamiya, K., M. Roscheisen and T. Winograd (1996): Grassroots: A System Providing a Uniform Framework for Communicating, Structuring, Sharing Information, and Organizing People.Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, vol. 28, no. 7–11, pp. 1157–1174

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenberg, B., F. Pickard and J. McDermott (1996): Computer Support for Clinical Practice: Embedding and Evolving Protocols of Care. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Cambridge, MA. New York: ACM Press, pp. 364–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandviwalla, M.,S. D. Clark II and K. Sandoe (1995): Collaborative Writing as a Process of Formalizing Group Memory. Proceedings of 28th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, pp. 342–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and H. A. Simon (1958): Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J. (1993): Team Memory:Information Management for Business Teams.Proceedings of 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, pp. 122–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J. and M. Weiser (1996): A Research Framework for Empirical Studies in Organizational Memory. Proceedings of 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, pp. 178–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and H. Simon (1972): Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1991): Cognitive Artifacts.In J.M. Carroll (ed.): Designing Interaction. Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, M. (1983): On History and Other Essays. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992): Learning from Notes:Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation. Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto. New York: ACM Press, pp. 362–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, B. T. (1991): Making The Right Moves:Toward a Social Grammar of Software Support Hot Lines. Ph.D.thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. M. (1964): The Self-Management of Cultures.In W. Goodenough (ed.): Explorations in Cultural Anthropology:Essays in Honor of George Peter Murdock. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 433–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M., M. Kovalainen and E. Auramaki (2000): Diary as Dialogue in Papermill Process Control.Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 65+.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Y. (1992): Ghosts in the Network:Distributed Troubleshooting in a Shared Working Environment. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto. New York: ACM Press, pp. 346–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, M. (1994): On-the-Job Learning in the Software Industry: Corporate Culture and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1993): Distributed Cognitions. Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. In R. Pea and J.S. Brown (eds.): Learning in Doing:Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoe, K. and L. Olfman (1992): Anticipating the Mnemonic Shift:Organizational Remembering and Forgetting in 2001. Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems(ICIS), Dallas. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, pp. 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. and L. Bannon (1992): Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, C. M. and E.L. Hutchins (1992): Error as Opportunity:Learning in a Cooperative Task. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, pp. 409–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1990): The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B. (1994): Collective Intelligence in Computer-based Collaboration. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1989): The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving. In L. Gasser and M. Huhns (eds.): Distributed Arti cial Intelligence. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. W. and V. Zwass (1995): Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems. Information Systems Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1991): Creating Sociological Awareness: Collective Images and Symbolic Representations. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1993): Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Suchman, L. and E. Wynn (1984): Procedures and Problems in the Office. Office: Technology and People, vol. 2, pp. 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1987): Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Computer Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. and G. R. Ungson (1991): Organizational Memory. The Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 57–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. (1989): Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. (1990): For the Record: The Embodiment of Organizational Memory, 1850–1920.Business and Economic History, vol.19, pp.172–182.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information and Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA

    Mark S. Ackerman

  2. Social Computing Group, IBM Research, 650 Harry Rd, D2-252, San Jose, CA, 95120, USA; E-mail:

    Christine Halverson

Authors
  1. Mark S. Ackerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine Halverson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ackerman, M.S., Halverson, C. Organizational Memory as Objects, Processes, and Trajectories: An Examination of Organizational Memory in Use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 13, 155–189 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COSU.0000045805.77534.2a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COSU.0000045805.77534.2a

Search

Navigation