Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of Service Networking for High Performance Grid Applications

  • Published:
Journal of Grid Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on different efforts to provide quality of service (QoS) Networking to Grid applications done in the context of the MB-NG, GRS and DataTAG EU projects. These are leading edge network research projects involving more that 50 researchers in the UK, Europe and North America, concerned with the development and testing of protocols and standards for the next generation of high speed networks. We have implemented and tested the Differentiated Services Architecture (DiffServ) in a multi-domain, 2.5 Gbits/s network (the first such deployment) defining appropriate Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to be used between administrative domains to guarantee end-to-end Quality of Service. We characterised several hardware implementations of DiffServ and concluded on their appropriateness for several network scenarios. Since current and future Grid applications will have to use modified mechanisms of congestion control we have evaluated old and new TCP implementations over a Differentiated Services Networks. These quality of service tests have also included innovative MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) experiments to establish guaranteed bandwidth connections to Grid applications in a fast and efficient way. We have also developed a software based bandwidth broker architecture for Grids based on IETF standards which allows applications to transparently request dynamic and advanced reservations and implemented it in a real experimental network. We finally report on experiences delivering Quality of Service networking to high performance applications like Particle Physics data transfer and High Performance Computation. This includes quantitative results on the performance improvements that QoS brought to real data transfers in the context of High Performance Computing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Breslau and S. Shenker, “Best-Effort versus Reservations: A Simple Comparative Analysis”, in Proceedings of SIGCOMM 98, September 1998.

  2. S. Floyd and V. Paxson, “Difficulties in Simulating the Internet”,IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2001.

  3. S. Floyd and E. Kohler, “Internet Research Needs Better Models”, in Proceedings of HOTNETS-1, October 2002.

  4. http://www.mb-ng.net.org

  5. http://www.datatag.org

  6. O. Ibe,Essentials of ATM Networks and Services. Addison Wesley, 1997.

  7. R. Braden, D. Clark and S. Shenker,RFC 1633-Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: an Overview. June 1994.

  8. S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang and W. Weiss,RFC 2475-An Architecture for Differentiated Services. December 1998.

  9. http://www.cisco.com

  10. http://www.juniper.com

  11. http://www.procket.com

  12. http://www.internet2.edu

  13. C. Partridge,Gigabit Networking. Addison Wesley, 1993.

  14. S.H. Low, F. Paganini, J. Wang and J.C. Doyle, “Linear Stability of TCP/RED and a Scalable Control”,Computer Networks Journal, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 633–647, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Kelly, “Scalable TCP: Improving Performance in High Speed Wide Area Networks”, presented at First International Workshop on Protocols for Fast Long-Distance Networks, February 2003.

  16. B.S. Davie and Y. Rekhter,MPLS: Technology and Applications. Morgan Kaufmann Series on Networking, May 2000.

  17. “RSVP Signaling Extensions for MPLS Traffic Engineering”, White Paper, Juniper Networks, May 2001.

  18. V. Jacobsen, K. Nichols and K. Poduri,RFC 2598-An Expedited Forwarding PHB. June 1999.

  19. C. Bouras, M. Campanella and A. Sevasti, “SLA Definition for the Provision of an EF-based Service”, Technical Report.

  20. “SLA Definition-MB-NG”, Technical Report (work in progress).

  21. L. Zhang, S. Deering, D. Estrin, S. Shenker and D. Zappala, “RSVP-A New Resource Reservation Protocol”,IEEE Network, Vol. 5, No. 5, September 1993.

  22. Z. Wang,Internet QoS: Architectures and Mechanisms for Quality of Service. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. I. Foster, A. Roy and V. Sander, “A Quality of Service Architecture that Combines Resource Reservation and Application Adaptation”, in Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS2000), June 2000.

  24. S.N. Bhatti, S.A. Sorenson, P. Clarke and J. Crowcroft, “Decentralised QoS Reservations for Protected Network Capacity”, in Proceedings of TERENA Networking Conference, May 2003, 2003, pp. 19–22.

  25. M. Rose,RFC 3080-The Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol Core. March 2001.

  26. “The Iperf Traffic Generator”. http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/ Iperf/

  27. I. Foster, C. Kesselman, J.M. Nick and S. Tuecke, “The Physiology of the Grid: An Open Grid Services Architecture for Distributed Systems Integration”. www.globus.org/ research/papers/ogsa.pdf

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rio, M., di Donato, A., Saka, F. et al. Quality of Service Networking for High Performance Grid Applications. Journal of Grid Computing 1, 329–343 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRID.0000037551.92756.4e

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRID.0000037551.92756.4e

Navigation