Abstract
Workflow management and support has always been a constant challenge for workflow administrators in industry. This is characterized by the need to balance two conflicting goals—the need for control, and the need to provide sufficient flexibility for workflows to adapt to constantly changing business conditions. The traditional centralized and rigid model of workflow no longer suffices provide this balance. What is needed is an approach that provides sufficient flexibility while simultaneously providing an assurance of control for workflow administrators.
In this paper, we present such an approach. Our approach is based on two bodies of research work. The first one is the OpenWater approach, wherein workflows meant to be “discovered” on the fly as workflow participants themselves define and execute the workflows. The second one is our earlier work on adaptive workflow, where we have developed a 3-tier architecture that supports adaptive workflow. In our paper, we enhance our 3-tier architecture with some of the OpenWater ideas, in order to develop what we have called a “flexible workflow support and management” architecture. We also demonstrate it on a real-life example in insurance claims processing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atluri V, Mukkamala R. Modeling and evaluation of redesigning methodologies for distributed workflows. In: ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, Aug. 2000; also available from http://cimic.rutgers.edu/~atluri/mascots00.ps
Bussler C. Workflow class inheritance and dynamic workflow class binding. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Software Architectures for Business Process Management at the 11th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering CAiSE*99, Heidelberg, Germany ,June 1999; also available from http://hometown.aol.com/chbussler/
Casati F, Ceri S, Pernici B, Pozzi G. Workflow evolution, Data and Knowledge Engineering 1998;24(3):211–218.
Cook JM. Discovering models of software processes from eventbased data, In: ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 1998;7(3):215–249, also available from http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~jcook/papers/djournal.ps.gz
Edmond D, ter Hofstede AHM. A reflective infrastructure for workflow adaptability. Data and Knowledge Engineering 2000;34(3):271–304.
Ellis C, Keddara K. ML-DEWS: Modeling language to support dynamic evolution within workflow systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2000;9(3/4):293–333.
Ellis C, Keddara K, Rozenberg G. Dyamic change within workflow systems, In: Proceedings of Conference on Organizational Computing Systems 1995:10–22.
Fent A, Reiter H, Freitag B. Design for change: Evolving workflow specifications in ULTRAflow. CAISE 2002 LNCS 2348, 2002;516–534; also available from http://www.im.unipassau.de/db/literatur?key=FRF02
Griss ML. "My Agent will call your Agent... But will it respond?," HPLabsTechnical Report; available from http://www.hpl.hp.com/ techreports/1999/HPL-1999-159.pdf
Hagen C, Alonso G. Exception handling in workflow management systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2000;26(10):943–958.
Huang W-K, Atluri V. SecureFlow: A secure web-enabled workflow management system, 4th ACM Workshop on Role Based Access Control, Oct. 1999; also available from http://cimic.rutgers.edu/ ~atluri/rbac99.ps In: Proceedings of Workshop on Adaptive Workflow, available from http://ccs.mit.klein.edu/cscw98/
Kang MN, Park JS, Froscher JN. Access Control Mechanisms for Inter-organizational Workflow, available from http://www.list.gmu.edu/~jpark/publications.html
Karlapalem K, Huang PCK. Security enforcement in activity management systems. in Advances in Workflow Management Systems and Interoperability , pp. 166–194 , NATO Advanced Study Institute, 1997.
Klein M, Dellarocas C, Bernstein A, Special issue on adaptive workflow systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2000;9(3/4).
Kradolfer M, Geppert A. Dynamic workflow schema evolution based on workflow type versioning and workflow migration, Nov. 1998; available from http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/dbtg/Projects/ TRAMs/trams.html
Ludwig H, O'Connor L. MIERA: A method for inter-enterprise role-based authorization. IBM Research Report RZ 3208 Feb. 2000.
Muth P, Wodtke D, Weissenfels J, Dittrich AK, Weikum G. From centralized workflow specification to distributed work-flow execution. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 1997; also available from http://www-dbs.cs.uni-sb.de/public html/ papers/JIIS97.ps.Z
Narendra NC. Adaptive workflow management: An integrated approach and system architecture. In ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2000.
Narendra NC. AdaptAgent: Integrating adaptive workflows and multi-agent conversations for B2B E-Commerce. South African Computer Journal submitted, 2002; preliminary version available from http://www.ipipan.waw.pl/mas/sdc-wg/Docs/ N.C.Narendra-adapt-agentB2B-ijec-modified.pdf
Reichert M, Bauer Th, Dadam P. Enterprise-wide and crossenterprise workflow management: Challenges and research issues for adaptive workflows. In: Proceedings of Workshop Enterprise-Wide and Cross-enterprise Workflow Management: Concepts, Systems, Applications, 29. Jahrestagung der GI (Informatik '99), pp. 56–64; also available from http://www.informatik.uniulm. de/dbis/papers/1999/RBD99.pdf
Reichert M. Dadam P. ADEPTflex-Supporting dynamic changes of workflows without loosing control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems (JIIS), Special Issue on Workflow Management Systems 10(2):93–129; also available from http://www.informatik.uni-ulm.de/dbis/f&l/forschung/workflow/ ftext-adapt e.html
Sandhu RS. Samarati P. Access control: Principles and practice. IEEE Communications Sept. 1994;32(9); also available from http://www.list.gmu.edu/journals/commun/pdf ver/i94ac.pdf
Shan M-C, Davis J, Du W, Huang Y. HP Workflow Research: Past, present, and future. HP Labs Technical Report HPL-97-105 Aug. 1997; available from http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/ 97/HPL-97-105.html
van der Aalst WMP. Inheritance of Interorganizational Workflows: How to Agree to Disagree Without Loosing Control?, BETA Working Paper Series, WP 46, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven ,2000; also available from http://tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/staff/wvdaalst/Publications/p109.pdf
van der Aalst WMP. Exterminating the dynamic change bug: A concrete approach to support workflow change. Information Systems Frontiers 2001:3(3):297–317.
van der Aalst WMP, Basten T. Inheritance of Workflows: An Approach to Tackling Problems Related to Change, Computing Science Reports 99/06 , Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven,1999; also available from http://tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/staff/wvdaalst/Publications/p85.pdf
van der Aalst WMP, Hofstede AHM, Kiepuszewski B, Barros AP. Workflow Patterns, BETA Working Paper Series, WP 47, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 2000; also available from http://tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/staff/wvdaalst/Publications/ p108.pdf
Vonk J, Derks W, Grefen P, Koetsier M. Model, Architecture and System for Cross-Organizational Transaction Support in Virtual Enterprises, available from http://www.ub.utwente.nl/webdocs/ ctit/1/00000031.pdf
Vonk J, Grefen P, Boertjes E, Apers P. Distributed Global Transaction Support for Workflow Management Applications, available from http://www.ub.utwente.nl/webdocs/ctit/1/0000000e.pdf
WFMC Reference Model, available from http://www.aiim.org/ wfmc/standards/model.htm
Whittingham K. OpenWater-White Paper, IBM Research Division, Zurich Research Laboratory 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Narendra, N. Flexible Support and Management of Adaptive Workflow Processes. Information Systems Frontiers 6, 247–262 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ISFI.0000037879.05648.ca
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ISFI.0000037879.05648.ca