Skip to main content
Log in

An Inexact Newton-CG-Type Active Contour Approach for the Minimization of the Mumford-Shah Functional

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of segmentation of a given gray scale image by minimization of the Mumford-Shah functional is considered. The minimization problem is formulated as a shape optimization problem where the contour which separates homogeneous regions is the (geometric) optimization variable. Expressions for first and second order shape sensitivities are derived using the speed method from classical shape sensitivity calculus. Second order information (the shape Hessian of the cost functional) is used to set up a Newton-type algorithm, where a preconditioning operator is applied to the gradient direction to obtain a better descent direction. The issue of positive definiteness of the shape Hessian is addressed in a heuristic way. It is suggested to use a positive definite approximation of the shape Hessian as a preconditioner for the gradient direction. The descent vector field is used as speed vector field in the level set formulation for the propagating contour. The implementation of the algorithm is discussed in some detail. Numerical experiments comparing gradient and Newton-type flows for different images are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Adalsteinsson and J.A. Sethian, "The fast construction of extension velocities in level set methods," J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 148, No. 1, pp. 2–22, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Allaire, F. Jouve, and A.-M. Toader, "A level-set method for shape optimization," C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I, Vol. 334, pp. 1125–1130, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Ambrosio and V.M. Tortorelli, "Approximation of functionals depending on jumps by elliptic functionals via-convergence," Comm. Pure Appl. Math., Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 999–1036, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Aubert, M. Barlaud, O. Faugeras, and S. Jehan-Besson, "Image segmentation using active contours: Calculus of variations or shape gradients?" I.N.R.I.A. Rapport de Recherche, I.N.R.I.A. Paris, No. 4483, 2002.

  5. G. Aubert and P. Kornprobst, Mathematical Problems in Image Processing. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002. Partial differential equations and the calculus of variations, With a foreword by Olivier Faugeras.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.P. Bendsoe, "Topology design of structures, materials and mechanisms-status and perspectives," in System modelling and optimization, Proceedings of the 19th IFIP TC7 Conference held in Cambridge, M.J.D. Powell and S. Scholtes (Eds.), July 12-16, 1999, pp. 1–17, Boston, MA, 2000. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  7. A. Blake and A. Zisserman, Visual Reconstruction. MIT Press Series in Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Bourdin and A. Chambolle, "Implementation of an adaptive finite-element approximation of the Mumford-Shah functional," Numer. Math., Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 609–646, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Braides and G. Dal Maso, "Non-local approximation of the Mumford-Shah functional," Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 293–322, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Braides, Approximation of Free-discontinuity Problems, Vol-ume 1694 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Caselles, R. Kimmel, G. Sapiro, and C. Sbert, "Minimal sur-faces based object segmentation," IEEE Trans. on Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 394–398, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Chambolle, "Image segmentation by variational methods: Mumford and Shah functional and the discrete approximations," SIAM J. Appl. Math., Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 827–863, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Chambolle, "Finite-differences discretizations of the Mumford-Shah functional," M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal., Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 261–288, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Chambolle and G.D. Maso, "Discrete approximation of the Mumford-Shah functional in dimension two," M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal., Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 651–672, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T.F. Chan, B.Y. Sandberg, and L.A. Vese, "Active contours with-out edges for vector-valued images," Journal of Visual Com-munication and Image Representation, Vol. 11, pp. 130–141, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T.F. Chan and L.A. Vese, "Image segmentation using level sets and the piecewise constant Mumford-Shah model," UCLACAM Report 00-14, University of California, Los Angeles, 2000.

  17. T.F. Chan and L.A. Vese, "A level set algorithm for minimiz-ing the Mumford-Shah functional in image processing," UCLA CAM Report 00-13, University of California, Los Angeles, 2000.

  18. T.F. Chan and L.A. Vese, "Active contours without edges," IEEE Trans. Image Processing, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 266–277, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T.F. Chan and L.A. Vese, "A multiphase level set framework for image segmentation using the mumford and shah model," Int. J. Comp. Vision, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 271–293, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.D. Cohen, "Avoiding local minima for deformable curves in image analysis," in Curves and Surfaces with Applications in CAGD,A. Le Méhauté, C. Rabut, and L.L. Schumaker (Eds.), pp. 77–84. Vanderbilt University Press: Nashvill, TN, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L.D. Cohen and R. Kimmel, "Global minimum for active contour models: A minimum path approach," International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 57–78, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio, Shapes and Geometries. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM): Philadelphia, PA, 2001. Analysis, differential calculus, and optimization.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M.C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio, "Tangential calculus and shape derivatives," in Shape Optimization and Optimal Design (Cambridge, 1999), Dekker, New York, 2001, pp. 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L.C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations. American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Geman and S. Geman, "Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images," IEEE Trans-actions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 721–741, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Hackbusch, Theorie und Numerik elliptischer Differential-gleichungen. Teubner Verlag: Stuttgart, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Hintermüller and W. Ring, "A level set approach for the solu-tion of a state constrained optimal control problem," Technical Report 212, Special Research Center on Optimization and Con-trol, University of Graz, Austria, 2001. To appear in Numerische Mathematik.

  28. M. Hintermüller and W. Ring, "A second order shape optimiza-tion approach for image segmentation," Report 237, Special Re-search Center on Optimization and Control, University of Graz, Austria, March 2002. To appear in SIAM J. Appl. Math.

  29. M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos, "Snakes; active contour models," Int. J. of Computer Vision, Vol. 1, pp. 321–331, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  30. F. Mémoli and G. Sapiro, "Fast computation of weighted dis-tance functions and geodesics on implicit hyper-surfaces," J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 173, No. 2, pp. 730–764, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J.-M. Morel and S. Solimini, Variational Methods in Image Segmentation, Volume 14 of Progress in Nonlinear Differen-tial Equations and their Applications. Birkhäuser Boston Inc.: Boston, MA, 1995. With seven image processing experiments.

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. Mumford and J. Shah, "Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems," Comm. Pure Appl. Math., Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 577–685, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S.J. Osher and R.P. Fedkiw, Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces. Springer Verlag: New York, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Sethian, "A fast marching method for monotonically advancing fronts," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 1591–1595, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J.A. Sethian, "Fast marching methods," SIAM Rev., Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 199–235 (electronic), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  36. J.A. Sethian, Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods. 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1999. Evolv-ing interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, com-puter vision, and materials science.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Sokolowski and J.-P. Zolésio, Introduction to Shape Optimiza-tion. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1992. Shape sensitivity analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  38. A. Tsai, A. Yezzi, and A.S. Willsky, "Curve evolution implementation of the Mumford-Shah functional for image sege-mentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification," IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 1169–1186, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Y.R. Tsai, L.-T. Cheng, S. Osher, and H.-K. Zhao, "Fast sweep-ing algorithms for a class of Hamilton-Jacobi equations," CAM-Report 01-27, Computational and Applied Mathematics, De-partment of Mathematics University of California, Los Angeles, 2001.

  40. Y.-H.R. Tsai, "Rapid and accurate computation of the distance function using grids," J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 178, No. 1, pp. 175–195, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  41. J.N. Tsitsiklis, "Efficient algorithms for globally optimal trajec-tories," IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, Vol. 40, No. 9, pp. 1528–1538, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. Wloka, Partielle Differentialgleichungen.Teubner: Stuttgart, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hintermüller, M., Ring, W. An Inexact Newton-CG-Type Active Contour Approach for the Minimization of the Mumford-Shah Functional. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 20, 19–42 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMIV.0000011317.13643.3a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMIV.0000011317.13643.3a

Navigation