Skip to main content
Log in

The Gradient Projection Method with Exact Line Search

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The gradient projection algorithm for function minimization is often implemented using an approximate local minimization along the projected negative gradient. On the other hand, for some difficult combinational optimization problems, where a starting guess may be far from a solution, it may be advantageous to perform a nonlocal (exact) line search. In this paper we show how to evaluate the piece-wise smooth projection associated with a constraint set described by bounds on the variables and a single linear equation. When the NP hard graph partitioning problem is formulated as a continuous quadratic programming problem, the constraints have this structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bertsekas, D.P. (1976), On the Goldstein-Levitin-Polyak gradient project method, IEEE trans. Automat. Control, 21, 216–235.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertsekas, D.P. (1999), Nonlinear Programming, Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bertsekas, D.P., Nedić, A. and Ozdaglar, A.E. (2003), Convex Analysis and optimization, Athena Scientific Belmont, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brucker, P. (1984), An O(n) algorithm for the quadratic knapsack problem, Oper. Res Lett., 3, 163–166.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Calamai, P.H. and Moré, J.J. (1987), Projected gradient methods for linearly constrained problems, Math. Programming, 39, 98–116.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Demyanov, V.F. and Rubinov, A.M. (1970), Approximate Methods in optimizations Problems, American Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dunn, J.C. (1981), Global andasymptotic convergence rate estimates for a class of projected gradient processes, SIAM J. Control Optim., 19, 368–400.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn, J.C. (1987), On the convergence of projected gradient processes to singular critical points, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 55, 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dunn, J.C. (1988), Gradient projection methods for systems optimization problems, Control and Dynamic Systems, 29, 135–195.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gafni, E.M. and Bertsekas, D.P. (1982), Convergence of a gradient project method, Report LIDS-P-1201, Lab. for Info. and Dec. Systems, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldstein, A.A. (1964), Convex programming in Hilbert space, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 70, 709–710.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hager, W.W. (1979), Inequalities and approximation, In: G. Fix and C. Coffman (eds), Constructive Approaches to Mathematical Models, Academic Press, New York, pp. 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hager, W.W. and Krylyuk, Y. (1999), Graph partitioning and continuous quadratic programming, SIAM J. Discrete Math., 12, 500–523.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levitin, E.S. and Polyak, B.T. (1985), Constrained minimizations methods, ž.Vyčisl. Mat. i Mat. Fiz., 6, 787–823.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCormick, G.P. and Tapia, R.A. (1972), The gradient projection method under mild differentiability conditions, SIAM J. Control, 10, 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pardalos, P.M. and Kovoor, N. (1990), An algorithm for a singly constrained class of quadratic programs subject to upper and lower bounds, Math. Programming, 46, 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hager, W.W., Park, S. The Gradient Projection Method with Exact Line Search. Journal of Global Optimization 30, 103–118 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGO.0000049118.13265.9b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGO.0000049118.13265.9b

Navigation