Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Providing Transactional Properties for Migrating Workflows

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current workflow management systems have several limitations that need to be addressed by the research community. This paper deals with two of them: the lack of flexibility necessary in a changing business environment, and the lack of transactional guarantees for workflow applications.

To handle the dynamic character of current business environments and processes, we have proposed the Migrating Workflow Model. A migrating workflow transfers its code (specification) and its execution state to a site, negotiates a service to be executed on its behalf, receives the results, and moves on. The next place visited by the workflow, and the next service requested, is determined by both the objectives of the process and the results of the current requests.

The transactional properties are addressed by merging of the Migrating Workflow Model with a Transactional Workflow Model, in which the workflow designer has the ability of specifying, independently, the task coordination requirements, the failure atomicity requirements, and the execution atomicity requirements. The result, described in this paper, is a migrating workflow model endowed with transactional properties that guarantee the correct execution of workflow applications in the presence of failures and in the presence of concurrent access to shared data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Barbara, S. Mehrotra and M. Rusinkiewicz, INCAS: Managing dynamic workflows in distributed environments, Journal of Database Management 7(1) (1996).

  2. P.A. Bernstein and N. Goodman, Timestamp-based algorithms for concurrency control in distributed database systems, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, October 1–3 (IEEE, 1980) pp. 285–300.

  3. P. Cederqvist et al., Version management with CVS, Signum Support AB (1993), ftp://ftp.cebaf.gov/pub/marki/slow/cvs.ps

  4. A. Cichocki, Migrating workflows and their transactional properties, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Houston (1999).

  5. A. Cichocki, A. Helal, M. Rusinkiewicz and D. Woelk, Workflow and Process Automation: Concepts and Technology (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Cichocki and M. Rusinkiewicz, Migrating workflows, in: Advances in Workflow Management Systems and Interoperability, NATO Advanced Study Institute, NATO, Istambul, Turkey (August 1997) pp. 311–326.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Georgakopoulos, H. Schuster, D. Baker and A. Cichocki, Managing process and service fusion in virtual enterprises, Information Systems, Special Issue on Information Systems Support for Electronic Commerce 24(6) (1999) 429–456.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.S. Gray, Agent Tcl: A flexible and secure mobile-agent system, in: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Usenix Tcl/Tk Workshop (1996).

  9. S. Green, L. Hurst, B. Nangle, P. Cunningham, F. Somers and R. Evans, Software agents: A review (May 1997), http://www.cs.tcd.ie/Brenda.Nangle/iag.html

  10. K. Jensen, Coloured Petri Nets: A high level language for system design and analysis, in: Advances in Petri Nets, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 483 (Springer, Berlin, 1990) pp. 342–416.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Krychniak, M. Rusinkiewicz, A. Cichocki, A. Sheth and G. Thomas, Bounding the effects of compensation under relaxed multi-level serializability, International Journal of Parallel and Distributed Databases 4 (1996) 355–374.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Rusinkiewicz, A. Cichocki and L. Ness, Towards a transactional model for workflows, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Applied Corporate Computing, Monterrey, Mexico (October 1995) pp. 29–38.

  13. M. Rusinkiewicz, W. Klas, T. Tesch, J. Waesch and P. Muth, Towards a cooperative transaction model, in: The Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Zurich (1995).

  14. M. Rusinkiewicz, P. Krychniak and A. Cichocki, Towards a model for multidatabase transactions, International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 1(3–4) (1993) 579–617.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Wäsch and W. Klas, History merging as a mechanism for concurrency control in cooperative environments, in: Proceedings of RIDE-Interoperability of Nontraditional Database Systems, New Orleans, USA (February 1996).

  16. J. White, Telescript technology: Mobile agents, White Paper of General Magic (1996).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information and Computer Sciences Research Laboratory, Telcordia Technologies, USA

    Andrzej Cichocki & Marek Rusinkiewicz

Authors
  1. Andrzej Cichocki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marek Rusinkiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cichocki, A., Rusinkiewicz, M. Providing Transactional Properties for Migrating Workflows. Mobile Networks and Applications 9, 473–480 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MONE.0000034701.73879.cf

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MONE.0000034701.73879.cf

Search

Navigation